agentleFS
rainoftimerainoftime/pl-skills/acsl-annotation-assistant/SKILL.md

acsl-annotation-assistant

Skill17 starsChanged 9 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Create ACSL (ANSI/ISO C Specification Language) formal annotations for

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Add complete function specifications with preconditions and postconditions:

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    Add pointer validity and separation annotations:

    line 61
  3. Distinctive:

    Start with the function-level specification:

    line 119
  4. Distinctive:

    Create reusable logical definitions for:

    line 141
  5. Distinctive:

    When generating annotations for WP verification:

    line 196
  6. Very specific:

    Use assigns clauses to specify frame conditions

    line 197
  7. Very specific:

    Prefer \valid over raw pointer checks

    line 198
  8. Very specific:

    Use \separated for pointer disjointness

    line 199
  9. Very specific:

    Add loop assigns for all loops

    line 200
  10. Distinctive:

    Place contracts immediately before function declarations

    line 229
  11. Distinctive:

    Place loop annotations immediately before loop headers

    line 230
  12. Distinctive:

    Be precise: Avoid over-specification or under-specification

    line 236
  13. Distinctive:

    Test incrementally: Verify annotations with Frama-C as you go

    line 239
  14. Distinctive:

    Include rationale: Add comments explaining non-obvious specifications

    line 240

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

ACSL Annotation Assistant

Generate comprehensive ACSL (ANSI/ISO C Specification Language) annotations for C/C++ programs to support formal verification with tools like Frama-C.

Core Capabilities

1. Function Contracts

Add complete function specifications with preconditions and postconditions:

/*@
  requires \valid(array + (0..n-1));
  requires n > 0;
  ensures \result >= 0 && \result < n;
  ensures \forall integer i; 0 <= i < n ==> array[\result] >= array[i];
  assigns \nothing;
*/
int find_max_index(int *array, int n);

2. Loop Annotations

Generate loop invariants, variants, and assigns clauses:

/*@
  loop invariant 0 <= i <= n;
  loop invariant \forall integer k; 0 <= k < i ==> sum == \sum(0, k, array);
  loop assigns i, sum;
  loop variant n - i;
*/
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    sum += array[i];
}

3. Memory Safety Specifications

Add pointer validity and separation annotations:

/*@
  requires \valid(dest + (0..n-1));
  requires \valid_read(src + (0..n-1));
  requires \separated(dest + (0..n-1), src + (0..n-1));
  ensures \forall integer i; 0 <= i < n ==> dest[i] == \old(src[i]);
  assigns dest[0..n-1];
*/
void memcpy_safe(char *dest, const char *src, size_t n);

4. Assertions and Assumptions

Insert runtime and verification assertions:

//@ assert 0 <= index && index < array_length;
//@ assume divisor != 0;

5. Axiomatic Definitions and Predicates

Define reusable logical predicates and axioms:

/*@
  predicate sorted{L}(int *a, integer n) =
    \forall integer i, j; 0 <= i <= j < n ==> a[i] <= a[j];
*/

/*@
  axiomatic Sum {
    logic integer sum{L}(int *a, integer low, integer high);

    axiom sum_empty{L}:
      \forall int *a, integer i; sum(a, i, i) == 0;

    axiom sum_next{L}:
      \forall int *a, integer low, high;
        low < high ==> sum(a, low, high) == sum(a, low, high-1) + a[high-1];
  }
*/

Annotation Workflow

Step 1: Analyze the Function

Before annotating:

  • Identify inputs, outputs, and side effects
  • Determine memory access patterns
  • Understand algorithmic properties (sorting, searching, etc.)
  • Note any implicit assumptions

Step 2: Add Function Contract

Start with the function-level specification:

  1. Preconditions (requires): What must be true when function is called
  2. Postconditions (ensures): What will be true when function returns
  3. Assigns clause: What memory locations may be modified
  4. Behavioral specification: Normal and exceptional behaviors if applicable

Step 3: Annotate Loops

For each loop, specify:

  1. Loop invariant: Properties that hold before and after each iteration
  2. Loop variant: Decreasing measure proving termination
  3. Loop assigns: Memory modified within the loop

Step 4: Add Assertions

Insert intermediate assertions to:

  • Document algorithmic properties
  • Help verification tools
  • Clarify complex logic

Step 5: Define Helper Predicates

Create reusable logical definitions for:

  • Common patterns (sorted arrays, valid ranges)
  • Domain-specific properties
  • Complex mathematical relationships

Common ACSL Constructs

Memory Validity

\valid(ptr)                    // Single valid pointer
\valid(ptr + (low..high))      // Valid range
\valid_read(ptr)               // Read-only validity
\separated(ptr1, ptr2)         // No aliasing

Quantifiers

\forall type var; condition ==> property
\exists type var; condition && property

Logic Functions

\old(expr)                     // Value at function entry
\at(expr, Label)               // Value at specific point
\result                        // Function return value
\nothing                       // Empty set (for assigns)

Integer Ranges

\forall integer i; low <= i < high ==> array[i] >= 0

Behaviors

/*@
  behavior valid_input:
    assumes n > 0;
    requires \valid(array + (0..n-1));
    ensures \result >= 0;

  behavior invalid_input:
    assumes n <= 0;
    ensures \result == -1;

  complete behaviors;
  disjoint behaviors;
*/

Verification Considerations

For Frama-C WP Plugin

When generating annotations for WP verification:

  • Use assigns clauses to specify frame conditions
  • Prefer \valid over raw pointer checks
  • Use \separated for pointer disjointness
  • Add loop assigns for all loops
  • Include loop variant for termination proofs

Common Verification Patterns

Array bounds safety:

/*@ requires 0 <= index < length;
    requires \valid(array + index);
*/

Null pointer checks:

/*@ requires ptr != \null;
    requires \valid(ptr);
*/

Overflow prevention:

/*@ requires INT_MIN <= a + b <= INT_MAX; */

Output Format

Generate annotations in standard ACSL comment syntax:

  • Multi-line contracts: /*@ ... */
  • Single-line assertions: //@ assertion
  • Place contracts immediately before function declarations
  • Place loop annotations immediately before loop headers
  • Include explanatory comments when annotations are complex

Best Practices

  1. Start simple: Begin with basic contracts, then refine
  2. Be precise: Avoid over-specification or under-specification
  3. Document assumptions: Make implicit assumptions explicit
  4. Use predicates: Factor out common patterns
  5. Test incrementally: Verify annotations with Frama-C as you go
  6. Include rationale: Add comments explaining non-obvious specifications

Example: Complete Annotated Function

/*@
  predicate valid_array(int *a, integer n) =
    \valid(a + (0..n-1)) && n > 0;
*/

/*@
  requires valid_array(array, n);
  ensures \result >= 0 && \result < n;
  ensures \forall integer i; 0 <= i < n ==> array[\result] >= array[i];
  assigns \nothing;
*/
int find_max_index(int *array, int n) {
    int max_idx = 0;

    /*@
      loop invariant 0 <= i <= n;
      loop invariant 0 <= max_idx < n;
      loop invariant \forall integer k; 0 <= k < i ==>
                     array[max_idx] >= array[k];
      loop assigns i, max_idx;
      loop variant n - i;
    */
    for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) {
        if (array[i] > array[max_idx]) {
            max_idx = i;
        }
    }

    return max_idx;
}

Resources

This skill includes reference materials for ACSL:

references/

  • acsl_reference.md - Comprehensive ACSL syntax reference
  • common_patterns.md - Frequently used annotation patterns
  • frama_c_integration.md - Tips for using with Frama-C

Load these references as needed for detailed syntax information or advanced patterns.

Research Tools & Artifacts

Real-world ACSL and formal verification tools:

ToolWhy It Matters
Frama-CIndustrial C verification platform
WP pluginDeductive verification for C
** Jessie**Deductive verification via Why3
AST pluginAbstract syntax tree analysis
Value analysisStatic value range analysis
E-ACSLRuntime verification translation

Key Verification Projects

  • OpenSSL verification: Proving cryptographic primitives correct
  • Sel4 microkernel: Proof of OS kernel correctness
  • CompCert: Verified C compiler

Research Frontiers

Current active research in ACSL and C verification:

DirectionKey PapersChallenge
Automation"Automatic Invariant Generation" (2019)Generating loop invariants
SMT theories"Linear Arithmetic in C" (2020)Better arithmetic support
Concurrency"Concurrent Separation Logic"Verifying multi-threaded C
Ghost code"Ghost State" (Iris)Rich specification logic
Testing integration"Deductive Testing" (2021)Combining testing and proof

Hot Topics

  1. AI-assisted specification: Using LLMs to suggest invariants
  2. Compositional verification: Verifying large codebases
  3. Incrementality: Fast re-verification after changes

Implementation Pitfalls

Common mistakes in ACSL annotation:

PitfallReal ExamplePrevention
Missing assignsFrama-C reports warningAlways specify what changes
Weak invariantsVerification fails silentlyMake invariants strong enough
Missing loop assignsIncomplete frameAnnotate every loop
Overflow assumptionsUnsoundness in arithmeticUse proper bounds
Separation violationsAliasing bugsUse \separated explicitly
Incomplete behaviorsMisses error casesUse complete/disjoint behaviors

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.