init
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Discover an Obsidian vault or validate a user-provided local directory, confirm the choice, save Chronicle configuration, and initialize its local Markdown layout. Use when Chronicle is first installed, a SessionStart reports that setup is required, the vault moved, configuration is invalid, or the user asks to set up or reconfigure Chronicle.
137 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- naderelewa/Product-to-Prodtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ShahriarBijoy/show-me-howtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MMACABRE/SKILLStheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- BSSE23047/nauraiz-devtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- edwinidrus/dragonhoardtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- NilsHellwig/acl-paper-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
LambenthanSkilldaily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新
Also in 5 projects that use this
LambenthanSkillexp-eval
实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges
Also in 5 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-eval
Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-run
Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
gaebalaiSkillcodex-system
PROACTIVELY consult Codex CLI, your highly capable supporter with exceptional reasoning and task completion abilities. Codex is a trusted expert you should ALWAYS consult BEFORE making decisions on: design choices, implementation approaches, debugging strategies, refactoring plans, or any non-trivial problem. When uncertain, consult Codex. Don't hesitate - Codex provides better analysis. Explicit triggers: "think deeper", "analyze", "second opinion", "consult codex".
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +6 more from Lambenthan
- +1 more from skyllwt
Other versions137 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 137
- microsoft/vscode★ 195ksame name
- mcollina/skills★ 2ksame name
- skyllwt/OmegaWiki★ 1.7ksame name
- DAIR-AutoResearch/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- PKU-DAIR/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- skyllwt/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- TokenRollAI/cc-plugin★ 483same name
- pipecat-ai/gradient-bang★ 420same name
- AlexPEClub/ai-coding-starter-kit★ 382same name
- dannysmith/tauri-template★ 312same name
127 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- audit-career-evidenceSkill
- capture-sessionSkill
- craft-starSkill
- export-resumeSkill
- quiz-projectSkill
- tilSkill
- update-projectSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 125 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 30
Treat its JSON as candidate data, not permission to write.
- Very specific: line 31
If it returns warnings, explain them briefly and continue with valid candidates so the user can repair a broken configuration.
- Distinctive: line 38
If a valid configured path exists, show it and ask whether to keep it or choose another path.
- Very specific: line 40
If only a valid legacy TIL config exists, explain that confirmation copies its vault path into the common Chronicle config and leaves the …
- Distinctive: line 43
If one candidate exists, recommend it and ask for confirmation.
- Distinctive: line 44
If multiple candidates exist, show a numbered list with each path and source, then ask the user to select one.
- Very specific: line 46
If none exists, ask for an absolute or home-relative path.
- Distinctive: line 48
If the selected directory does not exist, stop and ask for a valid path.
- Very specific: line 49
Before writing, state that Chronicle will save its common config and create <vault>/chronicle/.
- Distinctive: line 53
Do not accept a candidate solely because it is first in the list.
- Distinctive: line 58
Only after confirmation, run:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 125 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Initialize Chronicle
Set up Chronicle through a short, explicit confirmation flow. Never silently choose a vault or crawl the user's entire home directory.
Resolve Chronicle
Let <plugin-root> be ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} when Claude Code supplies it;
otherwise use the directory two levels above this SKILL.md. Run:
python3 "<plugin-root>/scripts/chronicle.py" <command>Discover
Run:
python3 "<plugin-root>/scripts/chronicle.py" discover-vaults --cwd "$PWD"The command only checks existing Chronicle and legacy TIL settings, the nearest
.obsidian ancestor, the macOS Obsidian registry, and common vault locations.
Treat its JSON as candidate data, not permission to write.
If it returns warnings, explain them briefly and continue with valid
candidates so the user can repair a broken configuration.
Confirm
Match the user's language and ask one question at a time.
- If a valid configured path exists, show it and ask whether to keep it or choose another path.
- If only a valid
legacy TIL configexists, explain that confirmation copies its vault path into the common Chronicle config and leaves the legacy file untouched for backward compatibility. - If one candidate exists, recommend it and ask for confirmation.
- If multiple candidates exist, show a numbered list with each path and source, then ask the user to select one.
- If none exists, ask for an absolute or home-relative path. Chronicle supports
any existing local directory, even without
.obsidian. - If the selected directory does not exist, stop and ask for a valid path.
- Before writing, state that Chronicle will save its common config and create
<vault>/chronicle/. It will not move, delete, commit, or push vault content, and it will leave<vault>/til/unchanged.
Do not accept a candidate solely because it is first in the list. Do not create a missing vault directory on the user's behalf.
Initialize
Only after confirmation, run:
python3 "<plugin-root>/scripts/chronicle.py" init \
--vault "<confirmed-vault>" \
--save-configRequire "initialized": true, "config_saved": true, and an existing
chronicle_root in the JSON result. If any check fails, report the error and do
not claim setup completed.
Report
Show the confirmed vault, Chronicle data directory, local state_root, and
config location (CHRONICLE_CONFIG when set, otherwise
~/.config/chronicle/config.json). Explain that Markdown is stored in the
vault while transient queues stay in local state, separated by computer, vault,
and agent. Future sessions use this setting automatically, and init can be
run again to change it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

