agentleFS
r-jellyr-jelly/chronicle/skills/craft-star/SKILL.md

craft-star

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Turn a Chronicle project experience into an evidence-backed STAR story, resume bullet, 30-second summary, and one-minute interview answer. Use when preparing behavioral or technical interview stories, explaining a project decision or failure, or converting reviewed project records into career-ready narratives.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the target competency is not specified, infer up to three viable options such as technical depth, problem solving, failure and recovery, …

    line 17
  2. Very specific:

    Use reviewed records and [confirmed] claims for a final story.

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask one high-impact question at a time when ownership, result, or rationale is missing.

    line 37
  4. Very specific:

    Use <plugin-root>/templates/project/STAR.md.

    line 65

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Craft STAR

Build a defensible story from Chronicle records. Keep missing evidence visible instead of filling gaps with persuasive fiction.

Choose the Story

Resolve the project under <vault>/chronicle/projects/<project-id>/ and read its ledger plus relevant session records. Prefer one meaningful challenge or decision over a summary of the whole project.

If the target competency is not specified, infer up to three viable options such as technical depth, problem solving, failure and recovery, collaboration, ownership, performance, or prioritization. Ask the user to choose only when the choice materially changes the story.

Evidence Gate

Use reviewed records and [confirmed] claims for a final story. A draft may use [inferred] or [needs-evidence] material only when it is visibly labeled and excluded from final resume bullets.

Before writing, verify:

  • what the user personally owned;
  • the situation and relevant constraint;
  • the goal or responsibility;
  • the concrete actions and why they were chosen;
  • alternatives or trade-offs when relevant;
  • the observed result and how it was measured.

Ask one high-impact question at a time when ownership, result, or rationale is missing. Do not require answers to low-value details.

Construct the Story

Write:

  1. Situation: concise context, problem, scale, and constraint.
  2. Task: the user's responsibility and success criterion.
  3. Action: specific actions in decision order, including why, how, alternatives, and collaboration boundaries.
  4. Result: observed outcome with confirmed metrics; otherwise give a qualitative result and a missing-evidence note.
  5. Learning: what changed in the user's approach and what they would do next.
  6. One resume bullet using action + scope + result.
  7. A 30-second summary.
  8. A one-minute answer that can naturally support follow-up questions.

Make the user the subject only for directly owned actions. Use “the team” for shared outcomes. Do not inflate verbs or create numbers.

Review and Save

Show the draft and list every non-confirmed sentence. Offer the smallest questions needed to resolve them. Save only after approval by appending to:

<vault>/chronicle/projects/<project-id>/STAR.md

Use <plugin-root>/templates/project/STAR.md. Let <plugin-root> be ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} when Claude Code supplies it; otherwise use the directory two levels above this SKILL.md. Preserve existing stories and avoid duplicates with the same competency, event, and evidence set. Mark the story draft until its critical claims are confirmed; mark it reviewed only after user review.

Report the saved path, status, target competency, and remaining evidence gaps.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.