troubleshooting-skill-matrix
Skill2 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when maintaining ACCF or its legacy CBH implementation, investigating a recurring Codex execution error, or retrieving a specific framework incident. Ordinary tool use and unrelated coding do not require this workflow.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- qimen039-code/agent-cognitive-continuity-frameworkword for word, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-error-memorySkill
- bug-solution-memorySkill
- capability-routerSkill
- shared-semantic-anchorsSkill
- text-source-readerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Historical incident: use relevant native recall or a known source link first.
- Very specific: line 17
Unavailable capability: use capability-router when the current catalogue cannot cover the action or callability is unresolved.
- Very specific: line 48
Use python -B and pwsh -NoProfile -File.
- Very specific: line 54
Use reflexive-gap-analysis when known guidance and actual action diverge or framework artifacts displace the outcome.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ACCF maintenance and incident retrieval
The current model selects goals, actions, relevant evidence, and acceptance criteria. This skill supplies framework-specific sources and mechanical tools when they help that action. Existing authorization remains effective within the user's task scope; this skill does not add approvals, commits, reports, or delegation.
Select the needed path
- Current execution error: reproduce the exact failing input against its actual tool/runtime, identify the failing boundary, and use one applicable validator. Preserve the original symptom in a regression. Confirm the corrected result and an unrelated valid input.
- Historical incident: use relevant native recall or a known source link first. If exact details or conflicting/current decisions matter, open the corresponding source below. Do not read every index for an already identified source.
- Framework implementation: trace input -> producer -> consumer -> observable result. A field, file, test, or registered callback alone does not establish behavior in the current host. Test the requested outcome in addition to local contracts.
- Unavailable capability: use
capability-routerwhen the current catalogue cannot cover the action or callability is unresolved. Preserve explicitly named products and task surfaces.
Ordinary requests use exposed tools directly. The legacy keyword intake classifier is available for explicit compatibility diagnostics; it is not the default entry point. Unrecognized wording calls for model judgment, not another trigger rule.
Source entries
Choose only the relevant family:
| Need | Entry |
| ACCF conversation/ledger | ../embedded-harness\active_conversation_memory_registry.json |
| Known incidents | <PRIVATE_INCIDENT_ROOT>\_META_INDEX.md |
| Identified major incident | <PRIVATE_INCIDENT_ROOT>\major-incidents\_META_INDEX.md |
| Common execution errors | <PRIVATE_INCIDENT_ROOT>\common-error-corpus\_META_INDEX.md |
| App/browser interaction failure | <PRIVATE_INCIDENT_ROOT>\interaction-error-corpus\_META_INDEX.md |
| User-defined terminology | ../shared-semantic-anchors/SKILL.md |
| Actual interfaces and coverage | ../embedded-harness/host_capability_contract.json and the selected source file |
Native memory remains enabled for inexpensive recall. ACCF preserves precise project/conversation sources. Escalate retrieval depth for uncertainty, conflict, exact wording, currentness, or material consequences. Metadata navigates to evidence; use original files or exact raw events where precision is required. Historical maintenance instructions do not override current user instructions.
Mechanical tools
Paths below are under ../embedded-harness:
nested_tool_preflight.py: one exact JSON envelope on stdin or--input-file; supports currentexec_commandand legacyshell_command. Use for relevant command/parser risks, not duplicate validation of host-validated typed tools. Dispatchnormalized_argumentsverbatim. Different shells must not receive PowerShell rewrites.behavior_correction_hook.py: narrow accepted rewrites on the configured host surface. Other profiles remain validation or semantic-review candidates until their runtime path is proven.semantic_memory.py: explicitly authorized, source-bound v3 records. Native Codex memory uses the host's supported correction mechanism instead.text_source_reader.py: source-preserving index/search/outline/read over an explicitly scoped text collection, including crawl snapshots and code. Use when repeated discovery needs an index; a known small file can be read directly. Lexical candidates still require model semantic selection. For v3 stores usesemantic_memory.py discoverthenread --record-idto separate candidate discovery from full expansion.codex_session_ledger.py: explicit ledger generation/refresh and source resolution. The retained lifecycle bridge is not automatically invoked by the current host.task_continuity.py: explicit task-state reduction and recovery; use when a caller maintains and consumes the state. Its presence does not establish automatic sustained attention.
Use python -B and pwsh -NoProfile -File. Inspect help before unfamiliar operations. The client-update checker runs only after the user explicitly reports an update.
Learning and validation
Fix the task before expanding maintenance. A useful recurrence can become a source-bound CE or paired ERR/SOL when memory writing is authorized. Recording does not prevent recurrence by itself. Promotion requires actual action coverage, subject/parameter preservation, a real verifier, a postcondition, and normal/ambiguous input controls.
Use reflexive-gap-analysis when known guidance and actual action diverge or framework artifacts displace the outcome. Use skillopt-training-layer for selected offline optimization; the existing skill split remains revisable.
Structural tests establish structure. Runtime replay establishes that path. Task effectiveness needs representative real tasks with consistent inputs and outcome criteria. Report these boundaries directly; ordinary answers need no mandatory claim schema or additional report.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

