agentleFS
qimen039-codeqimen039-code/agent-cognitive-continuity-framework/skills/troubleshooting-skill-matrix/SKILL.md

troubleshooting-skill-matrix

Skill2 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when maintaining ACCF or its legacy CBH implementation, investigating a recurring Codex execution error, or retrieving a specific framework incident. Ordinary tool use and unrelated coding do not require this workflow.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 1

    1. qimen039-code/claim-boundary-harness★ 2100% same

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Historical incident: use relevant native recall or a known source link first.

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    Unavailable capability: use capability-router when the current catalogue cannot cover the action or callability is unresolved.

    line 17
  3. Very specific:

    Use python -B and pwsh -NoProfile -File.

    line 48
  4. Very specific:

    Use reflexive-gap-analysis when known guidance and actual action diverge or framework artifacts displace the outcome.

    line 54

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

ACCF maintenance and incident retrieval

The current model selects goals, actions, relevant evidence, and acceptance criteria. This skill supplies framework-specific sources and mechanical tools when they help that action. Existing authorization remains effective within the user's task scope; this skill does not add approvals, commits, reports, or delegation.

Select the needed path

  • Current execution error: reproduce the exact failing input against its actual tool/runtime, identify the failing boundary, and use one applicable validator. Preserve the original symptom in a regression. Confirm the corrected result and an unrelated valid input.
  • Historical incident: use relevant native recall or a known source link first. If exact details or conflicting/current decisions matter, open the corresponding source below. Do not read every index for an already identified source.
  • Framework implementation: trace input -> producer -> consumer -> observable result. A field, file, test, or registered callback alone does not establish behavior in the current host. Test the requested outcome in addition to local contracts.
  • Unavailable capability: use capability-router when the current catalogue cannot cover the action or callability is unresolved. Preserve explicitly named products and task surfaces.

Ordinary requests use exposed tools directly. The legacy keyword intake classifier is available for explicit compatibility diagnostics; it is not the default entry point. Unrecognized wording calls for model judgment, not another trigger rule.

Source entries

Choose only the relevant family:

NeedEntry
ACCF conversation/ledger../embedded-harness\active_conversation_memory_registry.json
Known incidents<PRIVATE_INCIDENT_ROOT>\_META_INDEX.md
Identified major incident<PRIVATE_INCIDENT_ROOT>\major-incidents\_META_INDEX.md
Common execution errors<PRIVATE_INCIDENT_ROOT>\common-error-corpus\_META_INDEX.md
App/browser interaction failure<PRIVATE_INCIDENT_ROOT>\interaction-error-corpus\_META_INDEX.md
User-defined terminology../shared-semantic-anchors/SKILL.md
Actual interfaces and coverage../embedded-harness/host_capability_contract.json and the selected source file

Native memory remains enabled for inexpensive recall. ACCF preserves precise project/conversation sources. Escalate retrieval depth for uncertainty, conflict, exact wording, currentness, or material consequences. Metadata navigates to evidence; use original files or exact raw events where precision is required. Historical maintenance instructions do not override current user instructions.

Mechanical tools

Paths below are under ../embedded-harness:

  • nested_tool_preflight.py: one exact JSON envelope on stdin or --input-file; supports current exec_command and legacy shell_command. Use for relevant command/parser risks, not duplicate validation of host-validated typed tools. Dispatch normalized_arguments verbatim. Different shells must not receive PowerShell rewrites.
  • behavior_correction_hook.py: narrow accepted rewrites on the configured host surface. Other profiles remain validation or semantic-review candidates until their runtime path is proven.
  • semantic_memory.py: explicitly authorized, source-bound v3 records. Native Codex memory uses the host's supported correction mechanism instead.
  • text_source_reader.py: source-preserving index/search/outline/read over an explicitly scoped text collection, including crawl snapshots and code. Use when repeated discovery needs an index; a known small file can be read directly. Lexical candidates still require model semantic selection. For v3 stores use semantic_memory.py discover then read --record-id to separate candidate discovery from full expansion.
  • codex_session_ledger.py: explicit ledger generation/refresh and source resolution. The retained lifecycle bridge is not automatically invoked by the current host.
  • task_continuity.py: explicit task-state reduction and recovery; use when a caller maintains and consumes the state. Its presence does not establish automatic sustained attention.

Use python -B and pwsh -NoProfile -File. Inspect help before unfamiliar operations. The client-update checker runs only after the user explicitly reports an update.

Learning and validation

Fix the task before expanding maintenance. A useful recurrence can become a source-bound CE or paired ERR/SOL when memory writing is authorized. Recording does not prevent recurrence by itself. Promotion requires actual action coverage, subject/parameter preservation, a real verifier, a postcondition, and normal/ambiguous input controls.

Use reflexive-gap-analysis when known guidance and actual action diverge or framework artifacts displace the outcome. Use skillopt-training-layer for selected offline optimization; the existing skill split remains revisable.

Structural tests establish structure. Runtime replay establishes that path. Task effectiveness needs representative real tasks with consistent inputs and outcome criteria. Report these boundaries directly; ordinary answers need no mandatory claim schema or additional report.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.