agentleFS
qf-studioqf-studio/navigator/skills/nav-skill-creator/SKILL.md

nav-skill-creator

Skill355 starsChanged 13 months agoMITView on GitHub

Analyze codebase patterns and create custom skills for repetitive workflows. Use when project needs automation or pattern enforcement. Auto-invoke when user says "create a skill for...", "automate this workflow", or "we keep doing X manually".

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

29 rules. About 0 are common, 27 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈27

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Create project-specific skills by analyzing codebase patterns and automating repetitive workflows.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Run through skill steps

    line 213
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify functions work correctly

    line 214
  4. Distinctive:

    Check output matches template

    line 215
  5. Distinctive:

    CLAUDE.md: - Add to skills section:

    line 228
  6. Distinctive:

    README.md: - Add to skills list:

    line 236
  7. Distinctive:

    .agent/system/plugin-patterns.md: - Add to skill registry:

    line 241
  8. Distinctive:

    Document: Update CLAUDE.md, README.md, plugin-patterns.md

    line 314
  9. Distinctive:

    Test library? (Jest, React Testing Library, etc.)

    line 326
  10. Distinctive:

    Document: Update project docs

    line 369
  11. Distinctive:

    Use Task agent for codebase exploration (saves 60-80% tokens)

    line 410
  12. Distinctive:

    Look at 3-5 examples minimum (find patterns vs outliers)

    line 411
  13. Distinctive:

    Keep skills focused (one pattern per skill)

    line 416
  14. Very specific:

    Use clear placeholders (${VAR_NAME})

    line 428
  15. Distinctive:

    Follow project style guide

    line 430
  16. Distinctive:

    Test with real project context

    line 434
  17. Distinctive:

    Check output against best practices

    line 436
  18. Distinctive:

    Check description has clear trigger phrases

    line 482
  19. Very specific:

    Verify plugin.json includes skill registration

    line 483
  20. Distinctive:

    Test with exact trigger phrase from description

    line 485
  21. Distinctive:

    Check Python syntax is valid

    line 492
  22. Distinctive:

    Verify function imports are correct

    line 493
  23. Distinctive:

    Test function independently first

    line 494
  24. Distinctive:

    Check error messages in execution logs

    line 495
  25. Distinctive:

    Update templates with correct structure

    line 503
  26. Distinctive:

    Add more examples showing variations

    line 504
  27. Distinctive:

    Remove optional features to separate skills

    line 513
  28. Distinctive:

    Keep core pattern simple

    line 514
  29. Distinctive:

    Add extensions as separate skills

    line 515

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Navigator Skill Creator

Create project-specific skills by analyzing codebase patterns and automating repetitive workflows.

When to Invoke

Auto-invoke when user mentions:

  • "Create a skill for [pattern]"
  • "Automate this workflow"
  • "We keep doing X manually"
  • "Enforce this pattern"
  • "Generate boilerplate for [feature type]"
  • "We need consistency for [task type]"

What This Does

  1. Analyzes codebase to understand project patterns
  2. Identifies best practices from existing code
  3. Generates skill with:
    • Auto-invocation triggers
    • Predefined functions
    • Templates
    • Examples
  4. Tests the generated skill
  5. Documents the new skill

Execution Steps

Step 1: Understand Skill Request

Ask clarifying questions:

  • What pattern/workflow to automate?
  • What triggers should invoke this skill?
  • What output format is expected?
  • Are there existing examples in the codebase?

Example dialogue:

User: "Create a skill for adding React components"
Assistant: "I'll analyze your codebase to understand React component patterns.
- What directory are components in?
- Do you use TypeScript or JavaScript?
- Do you want tests generated automatically?
- Are there style files (CSS/SCSS) per component?"

Step 2: Analyze Codebase Patterns

Use Task agent to explore (saves 60-80% tokens):

Use Task agent with subagent_type=Explore:
"Find existing [pattern type] in codebase:
 - Locate all [files matching pattern]
 - Identify common structure
 - Extract best practices
 - Find configuration files
 - Return summary of findings"

What to look for:

  • File naming conventions (kebab-case, PascalCase, etc.)
  • Directory structure patterns
  • Import/export patterns
  • Testing patterns
  • Configuration patterns
  • Documentation patterns

Example for React components:

Task agent finds:
- Components in src/components/
- PascalCase naming (UserProfile.tsx)
- Co-located tests (UserProfile.test.tsx)
- Props interfaces defined above component
- Export default at bottom

Step 3: Design Skill Structure

Determine skill metadata:

name: [project]-[pattern-type]
description: [When to auto-invoke + what it does]
allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash, Task]
version: 1.0.0

Plan directory structure:

skills/[skill-name]/
├── SKILL.md              # Main instructions
├── functions/            # Python helper scripts
│   └── [generator].py
├── examples/             # Reference implementations
│   └── [example].[ext]
└── templates/            # Output format templates
    └── [template].[ext]

Design predefined functions:

  • What repetitive logic can be automated?
  • What validation should be enforced?
  • What formatting ensures consistency?

Example functions for frontend-component skill:

  • component_generator.py - Generate component boilerplate
  • test_generator.py - Generate test file
  • style_generator.py - Generate style file
  • name_validator.py - Validate component naming

Step 4: Generate Skill Files

4.1 Create SKILL.md

---
name: [skill-name]
description: [Auto-invocation triggers + purpose]
allowed-tools: [List of tools]
version: 1.0.0
---

# [Skill Title]

[Brief description of what this skill does]

## When to Invoke

Auto-invoke when user says:
- "[trigger phrase 1]"
- "[trigger phrase 2]"
- "[trigger phrase 3]"

## What This Does

1. [Step 1 overview]
2. [Step 2 overview]
3. [Step 3 overview]

## Execution Steps

### Step 1: [Step Name]

[Detailed instructions for this step]

**Use predefined function**: `functions/[function-name].py`

4.2 Create Predefined Functions

# functions/[generator].py

def generate_[output](name, config):
    """
    Generate [output type] based on project patterns.

    Args:
        name: [Description]
        config: [Description]

    Returns:
        [output]: [Description]
    """
    # Implementation based on codebase analysis
    pass

4.3 Create Examples

examples/
└── [reference-implementation].[ext]
    - Real example from codebase (best practice)
    - Shows expected structure
    - Demonstrates conventions

4.4 Create Templates

templates/
└── [output-template].[ext]
    - Skeleton structure with placeholders
    - ${VAR_NAME} for substitution
    - Comments explaining sections

Step 5: Test Generated Skill

5.1 Verify skill loads:

# In project root
grep -r "name: [skill-name]" skills/

5.2 Test auto-invocation:

In Claude Code conversation:
"[Use one of the auto-invoke trigger phrases]"

Expected: Skill should be detected and loaded

5.3 Test execution:

  • Run through skill steps
  • Verify functions work correctly
  • Check output matches template
  • Validate generated code follows patterns

5.4 Iterate if needed:

  • Fix function bugs
  • Improve templates
  • Add missing examples
  • Clarify instructions

Step 6: Document New Skill

Update project documentation:

  1. CLAUDE.md - Add to skills section:
#### [Skill Name]
**Auto-invoke**: "[trigger phrase]"
**Purpose**: [What it does]
**Generates**: [Output type]
  1. README.md - Add to skills list:
- **[skill-name]**: [Brief description]
  1. .agent/system/plugin-patterns.md - Add to skill registry:
### [Skill Name]
**Created**: [Date]
**Pattern**: [What pattern it enforces]
**Functions**: [List of predefined functions]

Register in plugin.json (if applicable):

{
  "skills": [
    {
      "name": "[skill-name]",
      "path": "skills/[skill-name]/SKILL.md"
    }
  ]
}

Example Workflows

Example 1: Create Skill for Adding API Endpoints

User: "Create a skill for adding REST API endpoints"

Execution:

  1. Clarify:
    • Which framework? (Express, Fastify, etc.)
    • Where are routes defined?
    • Authentication required?
    • Testing strategy?
  2. Analyze (via Task agent):
    Find existing API endpoints:
    - Routes in api/routes/
    - Controllers in api/controllers/
    - Middleware in api/middleware/
    - Tests in tests/api/
  3. Design:
    name: backend-api-endpoint
    description: Add new REST API endpoint following project conventions. Use when user says "add endpoint", "create API", or "new route".
    allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash
  4. Generate:
    skills/backend-api-endpoint/
    ├── SKILL.md
    ├── functions/
    │   ├── endpoint_generator.py
    │   └── route_validator.py
    ├── examples/
    │   └── user-endpoint.ts
    └── templates/
        ├── route-template.ts
        └── test-template.spec.ts
  5. Test:
    User: "Add a POST /posts endpoint"
    Skill: Auto-invoked, generates route + controller + test
    Verify: Files follow project conventions
  6. Document: Update CLAUDE.md, README.md, plugin-patterns.md

Example 2: Create Skill for React Components

User: "Automate creating new React components"

Execution:

  1. Clarify:
    • TypeScript or JavaScript?
    • Functional or class components?
    • Style approach? (CSS modules, styled-components, etc.)
    • Test library? (Jest, React Testing Library, etc.)
  2. Analyze (via Task agent):
    Find React components:
    - Components in src/components/
    - PascalCase naming
    - TypeScript (.tsx)
    - CSS modules (.module.css)
    - Tests with RTL
  3. Design:
    name: frontend-component
    description: Create new React component with TypeScript, styles, and tests. Use when user says "create component", "add component", or "new React component".
    allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash
  4. Generate:
    skills/frontend-component/
    ├── SKILL.md
    ├── functions/
    │   ├── component_generator.py
    │   ├── test_generator.py
    │   └── style_generator.py
    ├── examples/
    │   ├── Button.tsx
    │   └── Button.test.tsx
    └── templates/
        ├── component-template.tsx
        ├── test-template.tsx
        └── style-template.module.css
  5. Test:
    User: "Create a UserProfile component"
    Skill: Auto-invoked, generates component + test + styles
    Verify: Props interface, exports, naming correct
  6. Document: Update project docs

Output Format

After generating skill, show summary:

✅ Skill Created: [skill-name]

Structure:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📁 skills/[skill-name]/
   ├── SKILL.md
   ├── functions/
   │   └── [N functions created]
   ├── examples/
   │   └── [N examples added]
   └── templates/
       └── [N templates created]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Auto-Invocation Triggers:
- "[trigger 1]"
- "[trigger 2]"
- "[trigger 3]"

Next Steps:
1. Test the skill: "[example trigger phrase]"
2. Iterate if needed
3. Documentation updated

Try it now: "[example usage]"

Best Practices

Pattern Analysis

  • Use Task agent for codebase exploration (saves 60-80% tokens)
  • Look at 3-5 examples minimum (find patterns vs outliers)
  • Identify conventions explicitly followed
  • Note edge cases in comments

Skill Design

  • Keep skills focused (one pattern per skill)
  • Clear auto-invocation triggers (3-5 phrases)
  • Minimal tools needed (add only what's required)
  • Progressive disclosure (details in functions, not main instructions)

Function Creation

  • One function = one responsibility
  • Type hints and docstrings required
  • Handle errors gracefully
  • Return structured data (not print statements)

Template Design

  • Use clear placeholders (${VAR_NAME})
  • Include comments explaining sections
  • Follow project style guide
  • Provide sensible defaults

Testing

  • Test with real project context
  • Verify auto-invocation works
  • Check output against best practices
  • Iterate based on actual usage

Common Patterns to Automate

Backend Patterns

  • REST API endpoints
  • GraphQL resolvers
  • Database migrations
  • Background jobs
  • Middleware functions
  • Authentication guards

Frontend Patterns

  • React/Vue/Svelte components
  • Redux/Vuex store modules
  • API client functions
  • Form validation schemas
  • Route definitions
  • Style component creation

Infrastructure Patterns

  • Docker service configs
  • CI/CD pipeline steps
  • Deployment scripts
  • Environment configs
  • Monitoring setup

Documentation Patterns

  • API documentation
  • Component documentation
  • Architecture decision records (ADRs)
  • Runbook entries
  • Changelog entries

Troubleshooting

Skill Not Auto-Invoking

Problem: Skill created but doesn't trigger automatically

Solutions:

  1. Check description has clear trigger phrases
  2. Verify plugin.json includes skill registration
  3. Reload Claude Code to refresh skill index
  4. Test with exact trigger phrase from description

Functions Not Executing

Problem: Predefined functions throw errors

Solutions:

  1. Check Python syntax is valid
  2. Verify function imports are correct
  3. Test function independently first
  4. Check error messages in execution logs

Templates Not Matching Output

Problem: Generated code doesn't match project conventions

Solutions:

  1. Re-analyze codebase for missed patterns
  2. Update templates with correct structure
  3. Add more examples showing variations
  4. Validate against linter/formatter

Skill Too Broad

Problem: Skill tries to do too much

Solutions:

  1. Split into multiple focused skills
  2. Remove optional features to separate skills
  3. Keep core pattern simple
  4. Add extensions as separate skills

Success Criteria

This skill succeeds when:

  • New skill auto-invokes correctly
  • Generated output follows project conventions
  • Functions execute without errors
  • Templates produce valid code
  • Examples are clear and relevant
  • Documentation is updated
  • Skill saves time vs manual work

The skill-creator is Navigator's self-improving engine - it learns your patterns and automates them 🔄

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.