backend-test
Skill355 starsChanged 13 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate backend tests (unit, integration, mocks) for existing code. Auto-invoke when user says "write test for", "add test", "test this", or "create test".
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- alekspetrov/navigatorword for word, first seen Oct 31, 2025
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- alekspetrov/navigator★ 355100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- templates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- backend-endpointSkill
- database-migrationSkill
- frontend-componentSkill
- frontend-testSkill
- nav-briefSkill
- nav-compactSkill
- nav-deep-researchSkill
- nav-diagnoseSkill
- nav-featuresSkill
- nav-graphSkill
- nav-initSkill
- nav-loopSkill
- nav-markerSkill
- nav-onboardSkill
- nav-pilotSkill
- nav-profileSkill
- nav-releaseSkill
- nav-simplifySkill
- nav-skill-creatorSkill
- nav-sopSkill
- nav-startSkill
- nav-statsSkill
- nav-sync-claudeSkill
- nav-taskSkill
- nav-trizSkill
- nav-upgradeSkill
- nav-workflowSkill
- plugin-slash-commandSkill
- product-designSkill
- visual-regressionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 41
If the user named a specific file, use it.
- Distinctive: line 49
Read the target file in full so the generated tests cover its actual behavior, not assumed behavior.
- Very specific: line 68
File location: place tests where existing tests live (mirror the project's convention — colocated *.test.ts next to source, or under a …
- Distinctive: line 117
Run the generated tests:
- Distinctive: line 122
If any fail because tests assume incorrect behavior, fix the tests, not the source — unless the source has an actual bug.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Backend Test Generator
Generate backend tests for existing code — typically code that was written without tests, or where additional coverage is needed beyond what a code-writing skill (backend-endpoint) already produced.
When to use this vs.
backend-endpoint:backend-endpointgenerates tests as part of creating a new endpoint. Usebackend-testwhen the code already exists and you need to add or expand its tests.
When to Invoke
Auto-invoke when user says:
- "Write test for [file/function]"
- "Add test" / "Add tests"
- "Test this"
- "Create test for [thing]"
- "Test the [api/service/function]"
Execution Steps
Step 0: Check Existing Patterns (Phase 0)
Query the knowledge graph for what we know about testing in this project:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(cat "${NAVIGATOR_CONFIG_HOME:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/navigator}/plugin-root" 2>/dev/null)}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_manager.py" \
--action query --concept testing \
--graph-path .agent/knowledge/graph.json 2>/dev/null | head -40Surface patterns (preferred frameworks, mocking conventions) and pitfalls (flaky-test gotchas). If the graph returns nothing, proceed without it.
Step 1: Locate Code Under Test
If the user named a specific file, use it. Otherwise, ask:
What should I test?
- File path (e.g., src/services/userService.ts)
- Function name (e.g., authenticateUser)
- API endpoint (e.g., POST /api/login)Read the target file in full so the generated tests cover its actual behavior, not assumed behavior.
Step 2: Detect Test Framework
# Jest
grep -q '"jest"' package.json 2>/dev/null && echo "Jest detected"
# Vitest
grep -q '"vitest"' package.json 2>/dev/null && echo "Vitest detected"
# Mocha
grep -q '"mocha"' package.json 2>/dev/null && echo "Mocha detected"
# Node test runner (built-in)
[ -f "package.json" ] && grep -q '"test":\s*"node --test' package.json && echo "node:test detected"Detect existing test patterns by reading a peer test file under __tests__/, tests/, or *.test.ts alongside the target.
Step 3: Generate Test File
File location: place tests where existing tests live (mirror the project's convention — colocated *.test.ts next to source, or under a tests/ directory).
Structure (Jest/Vitest):
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest'; // or 'jest'
import { {FUNCTION_NAME} } from '{TARGET_PATH}';
describe('{FUNCTION_NAME}', () => {
describe('happy path', () => {
it('returns expected result for valid input', () => {
const result = {FUNCTION_NAME}({VALID_INPUT});
expect(result).toEqual({EXPECTED});
});
});
describe('error cases', () => {
it('throws on invalid input', () => {
expect(() => {FUNCTION_NAME}({INVALID_INPUT})).toThrow();
});
});
describe('edge cases', () => {
it('handles empty input', () => { /* ... */ });
it('handles boundary values', () => { /* ... */ });
});
});For API/integration tests (supertest pattern):
import request from 'supertest';
import { app } from '{APP_PATH}';
describe('{METHOD} {PATH}', () => {
it('returns 200 for valid request', async () => {
const response = await request(app).{method}('{PATH}').send({BODY});
expect(response.status).toBe(200);
expect(response.body).toMatchObject({EXPECTED_SHAPE});
});
it('returns 4xx for invalid request', async () => {
const response = await request(app).{method}('{PATH}').send({BAD_BODY});
expect(response.status).toBe(400);
});
});Step 4: Verify
Run the generated tests:
{TEST_COMMAND} {TEST_FILE_PATH}If any fail because tests assume incorrect behavior, fix the tests, not the source — unless the source has an actual bug. If the source is buggy, surface that to the user; don't silently change it.
Step 5: Emit Execution Summary (Graph Ingestion)
{
"execution_summary": {
"skill": "backend-test",
"task": "tests for {TARGET}",
"files_created": ["{test file path}"],
"files_modified": [],
"tests_added": ["{test file path}"],
"stack_detected": "{e.g. vitest+supertest}",
"patterns_followed": [
{"summary": "{e.g. supertest pattern for HTTP integration tests}", "concepts": ["testing", "api"], "confidence": 0.8}
],
"decisions_made": [
{"summary": "{e.g. mocked the DB client because tests must run offline}", "concepts": ["testing"], "confidence": 0.75}
],
"pitfalls_avoided": [],
"assumptions_made": ["{e.g. project uses Vitest globals — no explicit import needed}"]
}
}Ingest:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(cat "${NAVIGATOR_CONFIG_HOME:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/navigator}/plugin-root" 2>/dev/null)}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
echo '<execution_summary JSON>' | python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/execution_to_graph.py" -Success Criteria
- Test file located where the project keeps tests (mirrors convention)
- Happy path, error cases, and at least one edge case covered
- Mocks isolate the unit under test
- All generated tests pass on first run (or surface real bugs in the source)
- Execution summary emitted
When NOT to Use This Skill
- You're creating a new endpoint from scratch — use
backend-endpoint(it generates tests as part of its workflow) - You want to test a UI component — use
frontend-test
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

