agentleFS
qf-studioqf-studio/navigator/skills/backend-test/SKILL.md

backend-test

Skill355 starsChanged 13 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate backend tests (unit, integration, mocks) for existing code. Auto-invoke when user says "write test for", "add test", "test this", or "create test".

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the user named a specific file, use it.

    line 41
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the target file in full so the generated tests cover its actual behavior, not assumed behavior.

    line 49
  3. Very specific:

    File location: place tests where existing tests live (mirror the project's convention — colocated *.test.ts next to source, or under a …

    line 68
  4. Distinctive:

    Run the generated tests:

    line 117
  5. Distinctive:

    If any fail because tests assume incorrect behavior, fix the tests, not the source — unless the source has an actual bug.

    line 122

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Backend Test Generator

Generate backend tests for existing code — typically code that was written without tests, or where additional coverage is needed beyond what a code-writing skill (backend-endpoint) already produced.

When to use this vs. backend-endpoint: backend-endpoint generates tests as part of creating a new endpoint. Use backend-test when the code already exists and you need to add or expand its tests.

When to Invoke

Auto-invoke when user says:

  • "Write test for [file/function]"
  • "Add test" / "Add tests"
  • "Test this"
  • "Create test for [thing]"
  • "Test the [api/service/function]"

Execution Steps

Step 0: Check Existing Patterns (Phase 0)

Query the knowledge graph for what we know about testing in this project:

PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(cat "${NAVIGATOR_CONFIG_HOME:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/navigator}/plugin-root" 2>/dev/null)}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_manager.py" \
  --action query --concept testing \
  --graph-path .agent/knowledge/graph.json 2>/dev/null | head -40

Surface patterns (preferred frameworks, mocking conventions) and pitfalls (flaky-test gotchas). If the graph returns nothing, proceed without it.

Step 1: Locate Code Under Test

If the user named a specific file, use it. Otherwise, ask:

What should I test?
  - File path (e.g., src/services/userService.ts)
  - Function name (e.g., authenticateUser)
  - API endpoint (e.g., POST /api/login)

Read the target file in full so the generated tests cover its actual behavior, not assumed behavior.

Step 2: Detect Test Framework

# Jest
grep -q '"jest"' package.json 2>/dev/null && echo "Jest detected"
# Vitest
grep -q '"vitest"' package.json 2>/dev/null && echo "Vitest detected"
# Mocha
grep -q '"mocha"' package.json 2>/dev/null && echo "Mocha detected"
# Node test runner (built-in)
[ -f "package.json" ] && grep -q '"test":\s*"node --test' package.json && echo "node:test detected"

Detect existing test patterns by reading a peer test file under __tests__/, tests/, or *.test.ts alongside the target.

Step 3: Generate Test File

File location: place tests where existing tests live (mirror the project's convention — colocated *.test.ts next to source, or under a tests/ directory).

Structure (Jest/Vitest):

import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest';  // or 'jest'
import { {FUNCTION_NAME} } from '{TARGET_PATH}';

describe('{FUNCTION_NAME}', () => {
  describe('happy path', () => {
    it('returns expected result for valid input', () => {
      const result = {FUNCTION_NAME}({VALID_INPUT});
      expect(result).toEqual({EXPECTED});
    });
  });

  describe('error cases', () => {
    it('throws on invalid input', () => {
      expect(() => {FUNCTION_NAME}({INVALID_INPUT})).toThrow();
    });
  });

  describe('edge cases', () => {
    it('handles empty input', () => { /* ... */ });
    it('handles boundary values', () => { /* ... */ });
  });
});

For API/integration tests (supertest pattern):

import request from 'supertest';
import { app } from '{APP_PATH}';

describe('{METHOD} {PATH}', () => {
  it('returns 200 for valid request', async () => {
    const response = await request(app).{method}('{PATH}').send({BODY});
    expect(response.status).toBe(200);
    expect(response.body).toMatchObject({EXPECTED_SHAPE});
  });

  it('returns 4xx for invalid request', async () => {
    const response = await request(app).{method}('{PATH}').send({BAD_BODY});
    expect(response.status).toBe(400);
  });
});

Step 4: Verify

Run the generated tests:

{TEST_COMMAND} {TEST_FILE_PATH}

If any fail because tests assume incorrect behavior, fix the tests, not the source — unless the source has an actual bug. If the source is buggy, surface that to the user; don't silently change it.

Step 5: Emit Execution Summary (Graph Ingestion)

{
  "execution_summary": {
    "skill": "backend-test",
    "task": "tests for {TARGET}",
    "files_created": ["{test file path}"],
    "files_modified": [],
    "tests_added": ["{test file path}"],
    "stack_detected": "{e.g. vitest+supertest}",
    "patterns_followed": [
      {"summary": "{e.g. supertest pattern for HTTP integration tests}", "concepts": ["testing", "api"], "confidence": 0.8}
    ],
    "decisions_made": [
      {"summary": "{e.g. mocked the DB client because tests must run offline}", "concepts": ["testing"], "confidence": 0.75}
    ],
    "pitfalls_avoided": [],
    "assumptions_made": ["{e.g. project uses Vitest globals — no explicit import needed}"]
  }
}

Ingest:

PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(cat "${NAVIGATOR_CONFIG_HOME:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/navigator}/plugin-root" 2>/dev/null)}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
echo '<execution_summary JSON>' | python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/execution_to_graph.py" -

Success Criteria

  • Test file located where the project keeps tests (mirrors convention)
  • Happy path, error cases, and at least one edge case covered
  • Mocks isolate the unit under test
  • All generated tests pass on first run (or surface real bugs in the source)
  • Execution summary emitted

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • You're creating a new endpoint from scratch — use backend-endpoint (it generates tests as part of its workflow)
  • You want to test a UI component — use frontend-test

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.