agentic-delivery
Skill2 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when implementing a feature, migration or end-to-end change: build, add, ship, deliver, fix a ticket. Invoke FIRST, before inspecting files, even if the dir looks empty. Gated delivery: independent QA and security, one writer per worktree, human approval on push/merge/deploy. Not a typo fix.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- remigiusz-antczak/deep-code-reviewword for word, first seen Oct 16, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- remigiusz-antczak/deep-code-review★ 2100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agentic-ceoSkill
- business-opsSkill
- communication-structureSkill
- contributionSkill
- deep-code-reviewSkill
- growth-analyticsSkill
- idea-criticSkill
- positioningSkill
- product-discoverySkill
- product-output-safetySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 42
Use when a change spans build plus QA or security, writers would collide, or the owner asked for a feature, migration or release.
- Very specific: line 68
Every packet names deep-code-review, its scope (FULL/DIFF <base>/FILE <paths>) and the base or reviewed SHA.
- Very specific: line 80
Ask as Issue: one line, A: (recommended), B:, ≤12 words each.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Agentic delivery
Gated-delivery pattern, not a runtime or standing swarm. Does not replace deep-code-review (review is the bar; this is how work reaches it); one delivery OS per repo. Persisted artifacts are normal English. No files/tools? Say so once, never claim a reference loaded or a command run: write would run: <cmd>, mark unverified-depth. Full gate table, roles, worktree, human-gate, failure text: references/full-map.md.
Task to entry — a match skips INDEX.md; else read it and open only matching rows.
| Task | Open (bare *.md = references/) |
| Land PRs as a train; red gate or union | scripts/merge_train.py, scripts/train_land.sh, merge-queue-worktrees.md; gate-epistemology.md, red-gate-triage.md; flow-guards.md (dedupe hook, fitness check, flow alarms, freeze) |
| Start a lane; isolate its worktree | templates/lane-preamble.md in every brief; worktree-isolation.md, roles.md; templates/loops/ |
| Verify or relay a result; slow pipeline | verification-handback.md; pipeline-optimizer.md |
| Long session, compaction, new session, memory or docs bloat | references/focus-kit.md: update .claude/handoff.md (scripts/focus_kit.py handoff set) at each gate, before a context-heavy step, before handback |
| New machine or fleet | operating-discipline.md |
| Audit a repo's GitHub settings (branch protection, Actions token, deploy keys, webhooks) | run python3 scripts/repo_settings_audit.py OWNER/NAME... [--repos-file FILE] [--json]: read-only, a 403 or 404 is not checked; admin token for the full set |
| PR state; hand off; changelog | scripts/pr_state.py <n>; scripts/land_ready.py (open PRs ready to land, or why not); scripts/review_status.py --sha S --red N (post perun/review); scripts/premise_check.py <n>...; scripts/ci-gates.sh fragments |
| Cost cut, lane cap; "enforced" claim, CI cost | cost-quality-guardrails.md; host-enforcement.md |
| Fan-out size, host probe | fanout-host-sizing.md, fast-agentic-delivery.md |
| Dev server, local stack | dev-env-ownership.md |
| Resume, durable state; peer sessions | project-state.md; multi-session-coordination.md |
| Tracker, auto-close, multi-hour loop | work-tracking.md, unattended-trackers.md, unattended-operating-mode.md |
| Product surface; ADR; brief | production-grade-product-playbook.md, template-adr.md, template-onepager.md |
| Incident, support; G10, postmortem; install | incident-response.md, support-ops.md; retrospective.md, template-postmortem.md; install.md |
| scripts | scripts/review_gate.py, flake_ledger.py, focus_kit.py, handback_cap.py, heavy_gate.py, operating_selfcheck.py, outcome_claim_guard.py, pipeline_profile.py, queue_guard.py, serial_gate.py, session_brief.py, wired_check.py; templates/review-tiers.tsv |
Open references/full-map.md for multi-lane work, a red gate, host sizing, an unattended loop or a human-gate edge case. Sections cited as "SKILL.md <section>" (Conductor operating rhythm, Worktrees and occupancy, Local environment, Environment probe, Gate epistemology, Output contract) now live there.
When to Use
Use when a change spans build plus QA or security, writers would collide, or the owner asked for a feature, migration or release; not a typo. Load idea-critic before any agent-originated "we should" reaches the owner.
Hard rules
- Smallest sufficient team, hats from risk. The Conductor never self-approves. A builder never reviews builder and never wears QA, security or release-approval. Physical or social-engineering security is human-led under written ROE.
- Conductor reacts to a blocked gate, receipt, budget breach or collision; never does a lane's work. After two equivalent failures change approach.
- Low-blast work may collapse adjacent gates; it may not remove independent verification or an applicable human approval.
| Gate | Hard condition |
| G0 Intake | Goals, non-goals, appetite; idea-critic first. Shape references/template-onepager.md |
| G1 Spec | Acceptance criteria, deep-code-review scope, pinned base SHA |
| G2 Plan | One writer per worktree; every paid lane names a token/dollar budget before G4, none is blocked |
| G3 Design | ADRs / contracts: interfaces, NFR budgets, data/security decisions explicit. Shape references/template-adr.md |
| G4 Implement | Tests before or with the change |
| G5 Verify | Local = affected tests; CI on the exact SHA is the receipt; UI needs headed-browser evidence |
| G6 Review | Independent of builder; Blocker/Critical block, High needs a named owner |
| G7 Integrate | One owner; CI on the exact final SHA |
| G8 Release | Rollback proven; owner approves outward/production action |
| G9 Prod verify | Served SLOs; rollback on breach |
| G10 Learn | Escaped gap becomes a regression test; strip third-party identifiers |
Missing evidence is UNVERIFIED, never pass. Missing price is UNPRICED, never zero. Missing spend cap is BLOCKED, never unlimited. A lane's completion is G7; G8 is separate and owner-gated.
Exact revision
Every packet names deep-code-review, its scope (FULL/DIFF <base>/FILE <paths>) and the base or reviewed SHA. QA and security get the final SHA; a stale SHA fails closed.
Worktrees
One writer per worktree; assume a shared tree until proven isolated. Preflight: list worktrees and open PRs, claim the work, never duplicate a running lane. Use the repo's own script for repeatable steps. A child lane branches off the parent's local ref, never polls the remote. Spawn a heavy lane only while free RAM >15% and swap is flat (scripts/host_probe.py).
Human gates
Agents prepare; humans approve push, open/merge PR, publish, deploy, external replies or refunds, scopes/secrets/IAM, destructive migrations, force-push, flag flips, waiving a Blocker/High finding.
Standing grant. A grant counts only from an owner-authored artifact: the owner's own commit (author = owner) to CLAUDE.md or the state record, or their message quoted verbatim with date. The agent never creates, widens, extends, or re-dates a grant. Absent or ambiguous means gated. A merge that triggers deploy or publish is a deploy, never covered. Force-push, history rewrite, deploy, secrets, spend, external sends and destructive data stay gated. Park a gated item with its next step and continue.
Ask as Issue: one line, A: (recommended), B:, ≤12 words each; never a list of questions.
Output and failure
Workers return role, exact SHA, artifacts, commands run with exit status, findings with severity and location, remaining risk, cost or UNPRICED. A work item needs Where, Done-when, Verify, Why; missing Done-when or Verify is sent back.
A start or auth failure is no work done. A running lane is not a finished one. Done means verified — a green gate at the exact SHA. A model outage fails the lane closed. No uncommitted writer work without a recovery record.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

