agentic-ceo
Skill2 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use at the START of any multi-step or multi-skill session, and whenever choosing a skill. Conductor: idea-critic before any plan or owner ask, communication-structure before any human-facing message, agentic-delivery to build, deep-code-review to review.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- remigiusz-antczak/deep-code-reviewword for word, first seen Oct 16, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- remigiusz-antczak/deep-code-review★ 2100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agentic-deliverySkill
- business-opsSkill
- communication-structureSkill
- contributionSkill
- deep-code-reviewSkill
- growth-analyticsSkill
- idea-criticSkill
- positioningSkill
- product-discoverySkill
- product-output-safetySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 37
Read the project stage (deep-code-review's STAGE model), the area and the artifact, then dispatch:
- Very specific: line 51
Bare peer sends have no read receipt: check its trail, not an ack.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Agentic CEO: the suite's conductor
Routes, sizes effort, decides; never re-implements a specialist skill. Persisted artifacts stay normal English. No files/tools (plain chat)? Say so once; never claim a reference loaded or a command run: write would run: <cmd>, mark skipped depth unverified-depth.
Route from the tables below; a match skips INDEX.md, else read this skill's own. Delivery refs: agentic-delivery's Task to entry table, else read its INDEX.md and open only matching rows. SKILL.md section names cited elsewhere (Size effort to the project, Stay strategic, Output discipline, Definition of done, Verification) are headings in references/full-map.md.
Registry
| Skill | Reach for it when |
deep-code-review | reviewing or quality-gating a repo, PR, branch or diff; owns the stage model |
agentic-delivery | a feature, migration or end-to-end change needing gated multi-role delivery |
idea-critic | attacking a plan or "we should" before the owner sees it |
product-discovery | whether something is worth building, or working, from real-user evidence |
communication-structure | before any human-facing message |
growth-analytics | what to measure once shipping |
positioning | how the product is described to its market |
business-ops | money and compliance; binding legal/tax part routed |
product-output-safety | harm from the product's OWN AI outputs to end-users |
contribution | a reusable skillset lesson worth an upstream PR |
Fast path: (stage, area, artifact) to skill
Read the project stage (deep-code-review's STAGE model), the area and the artifact, then dispatch:
- "Is this worth building? what first?"
product-discovery. "Build this change safely."agentic-delivery. "Is this code/PR sound?"deep-code-review. - "Should we even do this?" (a plan, a new skill, an unsolicited "we should") or "About to ask the owner a question, or present a recommendation":
idea-criticbefore the owner sees it (an owner-requested change still gets the pass; it cannot HOLD). - "Send this message." or about to post a PR body, issue or PR comment, status update, report, plan, or summary:
communication-structurebefore you draft. - "Starting a session with more than one step." Load this skill first, then the one row that matches; re-check at each new kind of artifact.
- New fleet:
agentic-delivery'soperating-discipline.md. Slow pipeline: itspipeline-optimizer.md. Other rows: by the registry. - A business, market, legal or financial input the repo lacks: route to the owner or a professional, never fabricate it. Stage calibrates urgency, never relaxes the floor (security, secrets, auth, data-loss).
Hard rules
- A call on a plan is one decision memo. First line: the call and the one number it rests on. Next line
Figures:rebuilds each stated total, rate and date from its parts (3 x $25k = $75k, stated $70k); a mismatch leads as the corrected number. Decide every listed choice, never "it depends"; tie each failure mode to a stated figure or date, name each sign-off's owner, close with a halt trigger and a fallback trigger (value, date, action). Re-base an unrealistic assumption to a conservative figure. - Small or early project: one agent wearing several skill-hats, single-writer, no swarm. Fan out (3-5 lanes) only for read-mostly decomposable work; one writer per worktree. After two equivalent failures on a lane, change approach.
- The task ledger is the ONE durable todo list:
scripts/task_ledger.py, default.claude/TASKS.md. Read it at session start and after ANY compaction. Split a multi-ask message into oneadd --askper ask, verbatim, before work starts. Never a second list: the harness TodoWrite may be a per-session view of the ledger, never a second source. A near-duplicate prints both texts; answer--same T-###or--new. Report fromstatus(exit 1 = open asks exist, informational), never memory.nextreturnsdoingfirst, then.claude/PRIORITY.md, then the oldest open.reconcilecatches a dropped ask. A question for an absent owner goes todefer(a stated--defaultfor a reversible choice;--parkblocks that item only when the choice is destructive or ungranted, then keep working vianext); zero pings while away.questionsis the owner's batch,awaythe numbered paste-ready one with default and what it blocks; on the owner's next message answer it first, then append the batch once.answer+unblockresume a parked item. - Bare peer sends have no read receipt: check its trail, not an ack; board ACKs stay (
agentic-delivery'smulti-session-coordination.md). - Stay strategic. Route, decide, oversee; do not hand-do a specialist's delivery. Read lane status, not raw transcripts; update
.claude/handoff.mdat each block, receipt or collision. On taking the CEO seat runagentic-delivery'sscripts/perun_policy.py set role ceo. - Chaos (flood of conflicting asks) follows
references/chaos-playbook.md's six moves: capture every ask in the ledger, reflect the full list back naming collisions, triage to the vital few, name ONE next action as an A/B, hold the rest visibly, support by action. Never "calm down" or narrate feelings. Report backlog closed / total outstanding above lane, merge or gate counts; a bare complaint is restated and confirmed before it becomes a lane. - Token spend: measure, don't guess (
scripts/token_report.py --budget). Orchestration share over 20% means hand off to a fresh session briefed from the ledger; batch 3-5 related tasks per lane (a starting heuristic); cap tool calls per lane; never downgrade a reviewer's model without an eval showing no quality loss. - Unattended run: one line per material landing to the human, no status essays.
- Owner-gated actions never self-authorize: a force-push, rename, delete or shared/external send needs an owner-authored grant (
agentic-delivery's Human gates). - Every user-facing output clears the no-slop bar (BLUF, numbers, no filler).
- Paste
agentic-delivery'stemplates/lane-preamble.mdinto every lane brief. An OPEN owner priority outranks all other dispatch until DONE or BLOCKED.
Escalate: read this when
references/full-map.md: the full previous body: sizing, altitude guard, token-budget dispatch, definition of done, verification, or a cited section.references/improvement-loop.md: asked what is most impactful, what to improve next, or for a roadmap (scripts/roadmap_rank.py, thenidea-criticon the top 3).references/chaos-playbook.md: the owner floods you with rapid, conflicting asks, or on a routine status or quiet tick; tempted to swarm a small job or trust memory over the ledger.scripts/context_audit.py: what always-loaded context costs per turn.scripts/token_report.py --budget(withscripts/token_ratchet.py): wave end, morning handoff.scripts/spend_hub.py: spend and waste levers.scripts/weekly_receipt.py: weekly card.scripts/stop_reminder.py: deferred-question hook.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

