write-draft-x
Skill0 starsChanged 58 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user asks to draft an X (Twitter) post or thread from a selected idea, run the X Writer, or explicitly invokes /write-draft-x. Converts an Idea Note claimed for the x platform into a Draft Note in Drafts/ (platform:x), grounded in its linked research and following Content-Learnings/voice-guide-x.md. Decides single-post vs. thread from the idea's depth. Does not assign posting days and does not handle approval or scheduling.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- audit-draftSkill
- check-plagiarismSkill
- critique-draftSkill
- critique-draft-substack-articleSkill
- critique-draft-substack-noteSkill
- critique-draft-xSkill
- draft-commentSkill
- draft-replySkill
- extract-hookSkill
- generate-ideasSkill
- generate-visualSkill
- generate-visual-substack-articleSkill
- generate-weekSkill
- generate-week-substackSkill
- generate-week-xSkill
- humanize-draftSkill
- interviewerSkill
- monitor-engagementSkill
- optimize-profileSkill
- plan-advocacySkill
- plan-weekSkill
- plan-week-substack-articleSkill
- plan-week-substack-noteSkill
- plan-week-xSkill
- publish-substackSkill
- pull-analyticsSkill
- pull-analytics-xSkill
- repurpose-postSkill
- research-topicSkill
- review-draftsSkill
- schedule-approvedSkill
- schedule-approved-xSkill
- update-playbookSkill
- write-draftSkill
- write-draft-substack-articleSkill
- write-draft-substack-noteSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
Read the Idea Note and every research note in its sources[] — same verify-or-drop discipline as /write-draft: nothing in the post that …
- Very specific: line 30
Read Content-Learnings/voice-guide-x.md in full, fresh each run.
- Very specific: line 74
If this was the idea's only remaining unclaimed platform, flip status: selected → drafted.
- Distinctive: line 85
Never invent a fact, statistic, or quote not present in the linked research notes.
- Very specific: line 87
Never draft an idea that doesn't have an x entry in platform_schedule (run /plan-week-x first).
- Very specific: line 89
Never silently copy another platform's draft text — this idea's X version is written fresh from the research, in voice-guide-x.md's voice, …
- Distinctive: line 92
Never mark anything approved, scheduled, or published.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Write Draft X (X Writer — X pipeline)
X's sibling to /write-draft. Converts one or more Idea Notes with an x
entry in platform_schedule into Draft Notes (platform: x), written to
Drafts/ using _Templates/Draft-Note.md. Assumes /plan-week-x has
already assigned a day.
Arguments
- idea-id (optional) — draft one specific idea for X. If omitted, draft
every idea with an
xentry inplatform_schedulethat doesn't already have an X draft linked to it (an idea can have both a LinkedIn draft and an X draft — they're independent notes, never copies of each other).
Process (per idea)
1. Load context
Read the Idea Note and every research note in its sources[] — same
verify-or-drop discipline as /write-draft: nothing in the post that isn't
already in the linked research's Summary/Key Findings.
2. Read the X voice guide and playbook
Read Content-Learnings/voice-guide-x.md in full, fresh each run. Also
check Content-Learnings/playbook-x.md for an evidenced rule (real X post
ids attached) about length, hook style, or single-vs-thread performance for
this category — prefer it over the voice guide's generic defaults where one
exists.
3. Decide single post vs. thread
Judge from the idea's actual depth, not a coin flip: if the point lands in one tight statement, write a single post. If it genuinely needs several connected beats (a numbered breakdown, a before/after, a multi-step argument), write a thread. Don't pad a single-post idea into a thread to look more substantial, and don't cram a multi-beat idea into one over-stuffed post.
4. Draft the post
- Single post: hook-as-the-whole-post, tight, well under the character
ceiling in
voice-guide-x.md. Write the full text into## Post Textand leavethread: []empty. - Thread: first tweet is the hook (must stand alone if someone only
sees tweet 1), each following tweet one beat, closing tweet lands the
point without just recapping. Write the first tweet into
## Post Text(for at-a-glance consistency with single posts) and the full ordered sequence, first tweet included, into thethread: []frontmatter list. - Same opinion/fact framing rule as
/write-draft: a subjective take reads as a take ("I think," "my read"), not blended into declarative fact-voice.
5. Hashtags
0–2, only if genuinely useful for discovery, per voice-guide-x.md — don't
default to LinkedIn's 3–5 convention here.
6. Write the Draft Note
Copy _Templates/Draft-Note.md into Drafts/ as YYYY-MM-DD--kebab-slug.md
using the idea's platform_schedule entry for x (not target_date,
which is LinkedIn's). Fill in: idea_id, platform: x, category,
format, hook_style, hashtags, thread (per step 4), sources
(inherited from the idea), status: draft, history: [{action: created,
date: today, note: ...}]. Leave viral_score at 0 and visual_ids empty.
7. Update the idea
If this was the idea's only remaining unclaimed platform, flip status:
selected → drafted. If other platforms in its platforms list haven't
drafted yet, leave status: selected so they can still pick it up.
Report back
Show the full draft (all tweets in order if a thread), hashtags, per-tweet character counts, and which research sources backed it.
Hard rules
- Never invent a fact, statistic, or quote not present in the linked research notes.
- Never draft an idea that doesn't have an
xentry inplatform_schedule(run/plan-week-xfirst). - Never silently copy another platform's draft text — this idea's X version
is written fresh from the research, in
voice-guide-x.md's voice, even if a LinkedIn draft for the same idea already exists. - Never mark anything approved, scheduled, or published.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

