agentleFS
priyanshu-aryapriyanshu-arya/LinkedIn_Automation/.claude/skills/critique-draft-substack-note/SKILL.md

critique-draft-substack-note

Skill0 starsChanged 58 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user asks to review/critique a Substack Note's quality, check it for accuracy or duplication, compute its viral potential score, or explicitly invokes /critique-draft-substack-note. Runs the Critic Agent on a status:draft, platform:substack-note Draft Note, auto-revises it once if it scores low, and hands it off to approval by moving it to status:in_review.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Critique Draft Substack Note (Critic Agent — Substack Notes)

Reuses /critique-draft-x's short-form rubric shape (no thread-cohesion factor needed — Notes have no thread concept), scoped to platform: substack-note and Content-Learnings/playbook-substack.md's Notes section.

Arguments

  • draft-id (optional) — critique one specific note. If omitted, run against every platform: substack-note Draft Note currently status: draft.

Process (per draft)

1. Re-verify accuracy

Same as /critique-draft: re-read sources[], fix any drift now.

2. Originality / duplicate check

Scan Content-Learnings/content-index.md filtered to platform: substack-note. Same severity split as /critique-draft: genuine duplicate stops here (stay draft, flag, report); similar-but-distinct pulls the Originality sub-score down and proceeds to review.

3. Score Viral Potential (0-10)

Average these, each 0-10:

FactorHow to assess it
Hook strengthDoes the opening line land immediately?
ScannabilityShort and casual, no wall of text
Novelty / insightFresh beyond basic regurgitation
Discussion catalysisWould this get real replies from subscribers?
Technical accuracyConsistency with linked research
OriginalityInverse of step 2's findings
Historical playbook alignmentCheck playbook-substack.md's Notes section for a matching evidenced rule; otherwise neutral (5)

4. Auto-revise once if weak

Same rule as /critique-draft: below 6, one targeted pass re-reading voice-guide-substack.md's Notes section, recompute, stop after one pass.

5. Update the Draft Note

Same field updates as /critique-draft — skip entirely if step 2 found a genuine duplicate.

Report back

Same shape as /critique-draft's report.

Notifications

Same batching rule: one notification per run.

Hard rules

Identical to /critique-draft's hard rules, scoped to Substack Notes.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.