agentleFS
preetamnathpreetamnath/agent-skills/skills/tighten-instruction/SKILL.md

tighten-instruction

Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Make an instruction line read cold: clarify it into plain words, then tighten it to one positive line. TRIGGER when: user says 'tighten/clarify this rule/fact', 'make this leaner/simpler/clearer', 'titan instruction' in a skill, CLAUDE.md, agent prompt, or rule file.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before: *"Run tests after edits.

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    After: *"Run tests after every edit."*

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    Test it cold: Read the final line without surrounding context — every phrase obvious, the whole line actionable.

    line 29

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Tighten Instruction

Two passes in order: clarify the text into plain words, then tighten each distinct instruction or fact to one line — clarity first, so tightening never compresses back into jargon.

Steps

  1. State the goal in one sentence: what should the reader do or know after reading it?
  2. Clarify — make every phrase read cold (clear on its own). Decompose the line into phrases; name each phrase's intended meaning and fix any that won't land:

    • Jargon → plain word ("down-weight" → "rank lower").
    • Abstraction → concrete verb/noun ("optimize for" → "rank by").
    • Ambiguous referent → name it ("them" / "the better one" → the actual subject).
    • Mismatched verb → the true actor ("pick" when you only recommend → "favor").
    • Cryptic compression → unpack it ("not least effort" → "not the easiest option").

    Spend length here when it buys comprehension; preserve the meaning exactly.

  3. Tighten — cut what the clear line doesn't need. Drop any line whose only purpose is "restate the goal," "hedge," or "explain why"; keep a non-derivable rationale as a fact in Step 4. Collapse clauses the positive form already implies, and rename a heading that misnames its content. Never trade a plain word back for jargon to save space.

    Before: "Run tests after edits. Don't skip even for small changes — small changes break things too." After: "Run tests after every edit."

  4. Land each distinct instruction or fact on one positive line — in the shape the content wants:
    • Instruction → trigger + action: "When X, do Y." / "Use X for Y."
    • Fact → subject + the non-derivable part: "X is Y, not the expected Z." / "X — the constraint/reason." (gotchas, couplings, conventions, rationale all take this shape)
    • If it won't compress to one line: split — it's two.
  5. Test it cold. Read the final line without surrounding context — every phrase obvious, the whole line actionable. If not, redo.
  6. Score and gate the edit. Score confidence 0.00–1.00 that the final line is clearer, tighter, and meaning-preserving. If a caller owns a file-level gate, return the score and proposal without editing. Otherwise, apply at c ≥ 0.80; below that, keep the current line and report the proposal as held.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.