agentleFS
preetamnathpreetamnath/agent-skills/skills/handoff/SKILL.md

handoff

Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Compress the live conversation into minimal, copy-paste-ready handoff prompt(s) — context referenced by file path, not pasted — so a fresh chat picks up cleanly. TRIGGER when: user says handoff, handover, new-chat / fresh-chat prompt, prompt to continue or resume elsewhere; user asks for separate prompts to explore N threads in their own chats.

191 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use decision-mapping, setup-ts-deep-modules and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • FabienDehopreSkill

    decision-mapping

    Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 42 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    to-questionnaire

    Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.

    Also in 93 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    ask-matt

    Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

    Also in 87 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 51 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-beats

    Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

    Also in 54 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 172 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use the request and conversation to choose the prompt count and boundaries:

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Named items: Write one prompt per item, in order.

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    One thread: Write one prompt.

    line 17
  4. Very specific:

    Ambiguous threads: Use AskUserQuestion to ask whether to combine or separate them, and list the proposed split.

    line 18
  5. Distinctive:

    Delta: Add only missing current status, the last decision, and the next action.

    line 23
  6. Very specific:

    Missing owner: If the remaining state cannot fit a lean prompt, use AskUserQuestion to ask whether and where to create an active-state …

    line 24
  7. Distinctive:

    Skeleton: Use only the headings below.

    line 28
  8. Very specific:

    Fields: Put each label on its own line, place values beneath it, and bullet multiple values.

    line 29

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 172 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Handoff

Skip when "resume the work in <doc>" already suffices — just hand them that path.

Protocol

Step 1 — Scope the handoffs

Use the request and conversation to choose the prompt count and boundaries:

  • Named items. Write one prompt per item, in order; note any sequencing.
  • One thread. Write one prompt.
  • Ambiguous threads. Use AskUserQuestion to ask whether to combine or separate them, and list the proposed split.

Step 2 — Locate context to reference, don't restate

  • Source. Point Read first: at the state artifact the workflow already maintains (plan.md, interview.md, spec, or investigation); otherwise reference the source files, commit, or PR.
  • Delta. Add only missing current status, the last decision, and the next action. Drop completed next actions and tell the new chat to rebuild its task list from the sources.
  • Missing owner. If the remaining state cannot fit a lean prompt, use AskUserQuestion to ask whether and where to create an active-state artifact. Use a location maintained by an existing workflow or chosen by the user; never default to CONTEXT.md.

Step 3 — Draft each prompt

  • Skeleton. Use only the headings below; fold needed details into an existing field.
  • Fields. Put each label on its own line, place values beneath it, and bullet multiple values. Omit empty fields; include Status: only for work in progress.
  • Preferences. Let the target load its own repository instructions. Carry only task-specific guardrails.
Repo:
<abs path>[ · Working dir: <dir> — never touch <x>]

Read first:
- <path>
- <path>

Status:
<one line — where things stand>

Goal:
<the one outcome this chat should reach>

Constraints:
- <read-only vs act intent — "analysis only, present for me to decide" vs "kick off the work">
- <don'ts; guardrails not guaranteed by the target's config>

Output:
<what to produce / the format expected>

Step 4 — Emit

Return each prompt in a separate copy-pasteable block; write files only when asked. Add one paste instruction and one run-order line when sequenced.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.