admet-prediction
Skill8 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Predicts ADMET properties using ADMETlab 3.0 (119 endpoints with uncertainty), ADMET-AI, DeepChem MolNet, and chemprop D-MPNN with explicit handling of OECD QSAR principles, applicability domain assessment, calibration, hERG/CYP/AMES gold-standard endpoints, and PAINS / Lipinski / Ro5 / Veber / BBB druglikeness filters. Use when filtering compounds for drug-likeness, prioritizing leads by predicted safety, or building an in-house ADMET QSAR model.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- BuildHarbor/sciagent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- PharMolix/OpenBioMedtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- Pratikrishi97/sciagent-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 29, 2026
- K-Dense-AI/drug-discovery-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 16, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- PharMolix/OpenBioMed★ 1.1ksame name
- K-Dense-AI/drug-discovery-agent-skills★ 56same name
- BuildHarbor/sciagent-skills★ 1same name
- Pratikrishi97/sciagent-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository125 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- batch-processingSkill
- bowtie2-alignmentSkill
- bwa-alignmentSkill
- bwa-mem2-alignmentSkill
- codon-usageSkill
- compressed-sequence-filesSkill
- fastq-quality-scoresSkill
- filter-sequencesSkill
- format-conversionSkill
- hisat2-alignmentSkill
- motif-searchSkill
- paired-end-fastqSkill
- pysam-genomicsSkill
- read-write-sequencesSkill
- reverse-complementSkill
- sam-bam-basicsSkill
- samtools-bam-processingSkill
- seq-objectsSkill
- sequence-propertiesSkill
- sequence-slicingSkill
- sequence-statisticsSkill
- star-alignmentSkill
- transcription-translationSkill
- academic-cvSkill
- faculty-interviewSkill
- fellowship-applicationSkill
- industry-transitionSkill
- negotiationSkill
- tenure-dossierSkill
- conformer-generationSkill
- covalent-designSkill
- docking-rescoringSkill
- free-energy-calculationsSkill
- generative-designSkill
- molecular-descriptorsSkill
- molecular-ioSkill
- molecular-standardizationSkill
- pharmacophore-modelingSkill
- pose-validationSkill
- protac-degradersSkill
- qsar-modelingSkill
- retrosynthesisSkill
- scaffold-analysisSkill
- shape-similaritySkill
- similarity-searchingSkill
- substructure-searchSkill
- virtual-screeningSkill
- snakemake-workflow-engineSkill
- ai-disclosureSkill
- data-privacySkill
- image-integritySkill
- irb-protocolSkill
- ai-detection-awarenessSkill
- ai-disclosure-statementSkill
- scientific-voice-styleSkill
- text-humanizing-editorialSkill
- cellprofiler-pipelinesSkill
- image-analysis-best-practicesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match.
- Distinctive: line 23
If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API …
- Distinctive: line 29
No fabricated citations: Every cited work must resolve to a verifiable
- Distinctive: line 30
No claim without provenance: Every quantitative or factual claim
- Distinctive: line 31
No silent failure: Every script invocation, API call, or tool use must declare its exit status and what to do on non-zero.
- Very specific: line 42
Do not load this skill if the question is in a sibling skill's domain (see ## Cross-references), if the user explicitly asks for a …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- metadata:
category: chemoinformatics
oversight: low
version: 1.0.0
author: Pradyumna Jayaram
tags: [chemoinformatics, research]
difficulty: intermediate
-->Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: RDKit 2024.09+, requests 2.31+, DeepChem 2.8+, chemprop 2.0+ (note major API change from 1.x), admet-ai 1.3+, pandas 2.2+.
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- Python:
pip show <package>thenhelp(module.function)to check signatures
If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
ADMET Prediction
Hard rules
- No fabricated citations. Every cited work must resolve to a verifiable
- No claim without provenance. Every quantitative or factual claim
- No silent failure. Every script invocation, API call, or tool use must declare its exit status and what to do on non-zero. A skill that silently swallows errors is a violation.
When to use
Load this skill when the user asks a question that matches its declared
trigger conditions (see the frontmatter description for the most common
ones). Do not load it for questions outside its scope — defer to the
appropriate ORS skill instead.
When NOT to use
Do not load this skill if the question is in a sibling skill's domain
(see ## Cross-references), if the user explicitly asks for a different
tool, or if the task is outside the skill's declared category.
ADMET Model Taxonomy
| Tool | Endpoints | Architecture | Uncertainty | Access | Fails when | |------|-----------|--------------|-------------|-------------|---------|------------| | ADMETlab 3.0 | 119 (A,D,M,E,T + physchem + medchem) | Multi-task DMPNN + descriptors | Per-prediction | REST API (free, no auth) | Outside training distribution; metals; macrocycles | | ADMET-AI (NVIDIA) | ~50 (focus on safety) | chemprop D-MPNN | Ensemble variance | Python package | Limited endpoints vs ADMETlab | | DeepChem MolNet | ~30 (tox21, ToxCast, ClinTox) | Various GCN/GAT | Per-task variance | Python package | Models trained on small datasets | | pkCSM | ~30 | Graph signatures + RF | None | Web service | Smaller training data | | SwissADME | ~30 (filters + physchem) | Hand-curated rules | None | Web service (NO API) | Cannot batch programmatically | | ProTox-3.0 | ~46 (toxicity) | DT + descriptors | None | Web service | Toxicity only | | chemprop (in-house) | User-defined | D-MPNN ± descriptors | Bayesian ensemble | Python package | Requires training data |
Decision: For batch screening of <10k compounds with no in-house data, ADMETlab 3.0 (free API, 119 endpoints, calibrated uncertainty) is the modern standard. For in-house QSAR on a specific endpoint with >500 measurements, train a chemprop D-MPNN.
ADMETlab 3.0 API
The current standard for free ADMET prediction. 119 endpoints across 6 categories; per-prediction uncertainty.
import requests
import pandas as pd
def admetlab_predict(smiles_list, endpoint='admet'):
url = f'https://admetlab3.scbdd.com/api/{endpoint}'
payload = {'smiles': smiles_list}
response = requests.post(url, json=payload, timeout=120)
response.raise_for_status()
return pd.DataFrame(response.json())
smiles = ['CCO', 'c1ccc(C(=O)O)cc1', 'CC(=O)Oc1ccccc1C(=O)O']
results = admetlab_predict(smiles)ADMETlab endpoints: Absorption (Caco-2, HIA, Pgp), Distribution (BBB+, PPB, VDss), Metabolism (CYP1A2/2C9/2C19/2D6/3A4), Excretion (CL, T1/2), Toxicity (hERG, AMES, hepatotoxicity), Drug-likeness (Lipinski, Veber, QED).
hERG Cardiotoxicity (Gold Standard Endpoint)
hERG blockade causes QT prolongation and is the #1 reason for late-stage drug attrition.
| Model | Training data | AUC | Reference |
| Cai et al. D-MPNN + MOE | 7,889 compounds | 0.956 | Liu 2024 |
| ADMETlab 3.0 hERG | Internal | 0.92 (reported) | Fu 2024 |
| ProTox-3.0 | ProTox training | 0.86 | Banerjee 2024 |
Triangulation: For hERG, use ADMETlab + ProTox + literature. A single-model probability > 0.5 is NOT a kill signal.
Lipinski / Veber / Drug-Likeness Rules
| Rule | Constraints |
| Lipinski Ro5 | MW<=500, LogP<=5, HBD<=5, HBA<=10 |
| Veber | RotBonds<=10, TPSA<=140 |
| BBB+ Pfizer CNS | TPSA<=90, MW<=500, HBD<=3 |
from rdkit.Chem import Descriptors, Lipinski, QED
def druglike_score(mol):
return {
'MW': Descriptors.MolWt(mol),
'LogP': Descriptors.MolLogP(mol),
'HBD': Lipinski.NumHDonors(mol),
'HBA': Lipinski.NumHAcceptors(mol),
'TPSA': Descriptors.TPSA(mol),
'RotBonds': Lipinski.NumRotatableBonds(mol),
'QED': round(QED.qed(mol), 2),
}References
- Fu et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 52:W422 -- ADMETlab 3.0.
- Liu et al., 2024 -- hERG ML benchmarks.
- Lipinski et al., Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. -- Rule of 5.
- Bickerton et al., Nat. Chem. 4:90 -- QED.
Related Skills
- chemoinformatics/molecular-descriptors - Physicochemical descriptors
- chemoinformatics/substructure-search - PAINS / BRENK / REOS
- chemoinformatics/qsar-modeling - In-house ADMET model training"
Cross-references
Other skills in this category:
- conformer-generation
- covalent-design
- docking-rescoring
- free-energy-calculations
- generative-design
- molecular-descriptors
- molecular-io
- molecular-standardization
- pharmacophore-modeling
- pose-validation
- protac-degraders
- qsar-modeling
- retrosynthesis
- scaffold-analysis
- shape-similarity
- similarity-searching
- substructure-search
- virtual-screening
Changelog
- 1.1.0 (migration) — Bulk-migrated to v0.4.0 schema: canonical metadata block, base Hard rules, Cross-references. Body content unchanged; author should review and fill in any domain-specific extensions to the Hard rules.
- 1.0.0 — Initial release.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

