score
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Score an article against the 100-point A–G framework: category tables, dual verdict (overall + AI Overviews readiness), priority fixes, checklists. PL/EN/DE/ES/FR/IT.
15 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- akachandan1/video-studiotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Hainrixz/claude-dbtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Hainrixz/claude-seo-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- maroffo/claude-forgetheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- askoulwassim/perfect-placementtheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- gagoar/icebergtheir own version, first seen Oct 10, 2026
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 15
- quantumaikr/quant.cpp★ 403same name
- Hainrixz/claude-seo-ai★ 81same name
- Hainrixz/claude-db★ 22same name
- maroffo/claude-forge★ 17same name
- gagoar/iceberg★ 10same name
- askoulwassim/perfect-placement★ 3same name
- stonegiantstudio/skills★ 3same name
- akachandan1/video-studio★ 2same name
- dcolclazier/skills★ 1same name
- santiment/skills★ 1same name
5 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- alignment-auditSkill
- auditSkill
- citable-passageSkill
- content-briefSkill
- entity-coverageSkill
- humanizerSkill
- internal-linksSkill
- meta-tagsSkill
- navboost-auditSkill
- optimizeSkill
- researchSkill
- schema-genSkill
- seo-fundamentalsSkill
- topic-clustersSkill
- write-seoSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Ask only for what is missing and cannot be inferred:
- Distinctive: line 28
If a script cannot run (no network, no Python), say so and mark the affected criteria "unverified".
- Very specific: line 43
Use ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/report-template.md.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/score — Article scorer (A–G, dual verdict)
Target: $ARGUMENTS
The canonical article-level scorer of this plugin. /optimize uses it for before/after, /write-seo uses it as the final self-check. Weights, verdict tables, and every numeric target come from ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/seo-fundamentals/references/scoring-spec.md; per-criterion anchors from ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/criteria-details.md. Read both before scoring. Follow the ground-truth rules in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/seo-fundamentals/SKILL.md.
1. Inputs
Ask only for what is missing and cannot be inferred:
- Article (URL, file, or paste).
- Primary keyword — infer from title/H1/URL if not given and state the assumption.
- Language/locale — infer from the text.
- Domain Rating (if known; affects A5) and whether other language versions exist (affects C7/F1).
2. Measure before judging
- URL: run
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/fetch_page.py "<url>" --json→ title, meta, canonical, hreflang, OG, JSON-LD blocks, headings, links, images, body text. Then runpython3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/text_metrics.py --from-json <output> --keyword "<kw>". - File or paste: save to a temp file and run
text_metrics.py <file> --keyword "<kw>". - The scripts return word count, sentences, Flesch / FK grade / Fog, passive ratio, keyword density and placements, words-per-heading, and citable-passage candidates per 1,000 words. Use those numbers; do not estimate them.
- If a script cannot run (no network, no Python), say so and mark the affected criteria "unverified".
- For A2/B2/G3 you need the SERP: WebSearch the primary keyword, note the top 5–10 content types and depth; for G3 build or reuse an
/entity-coveragematrix when the user wants a rigorous information-gain check (otherwise mark G3 as an estimate).
3. Score
Score all seven categories A–G using the anchors. Be strict: 2 means genuinely met. When a criterion cannot be verified (no GSC, no CWV data), score what is visible and mark the rest "unverified — verify via {tool}". Never invent SERP or DR data.
Additional analysis modules to report alongside the score (they feed A, B, C but are not extra points):
- Intent alignment — target keyword, intent class, does the content type match the top-5 SERP, confidence.
- Length vs SERP — word count vs estimated top-10 median; sections to expand if below.
- Readability — script output vs targets; overall grade.
- Entity salience — G1 proxy checks (title, H1, first 50 words, sentence-subject count).
4. Output (in the article's language)
Use ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/report-template.md. Sections, in order:
- Header (title, URL, language, date, primary keyword, DR).
- Category tables A–G (
#, criterion, max, score, evidence/notes) with subtotals. - Overall scorecard (A–G, max, score, %).
- Dual verdict — overall (✅🟡🟠🔴⛔) and AI Overviews readiness (G/15 normalized: AI-READY / PARTIAL / WEAK / OPAQUE). Say explicitly when they diverge.
- Priority fixes — categories under 60% of max; top 3–5 criteria with concrete action, effort, and re-check date. Put G fixes first whenever AI Overviews readiness is below PARTIAL.
- Pre-publish checklists — classical TOP 10 and entity/AI TOP 7 (in the template), ✅/❌ each.
- Locale notes when relevant (
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/locale-notes.md).
5. Follow-ups to offer
/citable-passage— passage-level deep dive when G6 < 2./entity-coverage— build the matrix behind G2/G3./alignment-audit— when G4 < 2 or schema was detected./optimize— apply the fixes and re-score.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

