zero-script-qa
Skill605 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Zero Script QA — test without scripts using structured JSON logging and Docker monitoring. Triggers: zero-script-qa, log testing, docker logs, QA
- Reads credentials
- Sends data out
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-codeword for word, first seen Aug 14, 2026
- ww-w-ai/bkit-geminitheir own version, first seen Apr 9, 2026
- ww-w-ai/bkit-codextheir own version, first seen Feb 23, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code★ 605100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- ww-w-ai/bkit-codex★ 69same name
- ww-w-ai/bkit-gemini★ 66same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- auditSkill
- bkend-authSkill
- bkend-cookbookSkill
- bkend-dataSkill
- bkend-quickstartSkill
- bkend-storageSkill
- bkit-evalsSkill
- bkit-exploreSkill
- bkit-rulesSkill
- bkitSkill
- bkit-templatesSkill
- btwSkill
- cc-version-analysisSkill
- claude-code-learningSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- controlSkill
- deploySkill
- desktop-appSkill
- development-pipelineSkill
- dynamicSkill
- enterpriseSkill
- mobile-appSkill
- pdca-batchSkill
- pdca-fast-trackSkill
- pdcaSkill
- pdca-watchSkill
- phase-1-schemaSkill
- phase-2-conventionSkill
- phase-3-mockupSkill
- phase-4-apiSkill
- phase-5-design-systemSkill
- phase-6-ui-integrationSkill
- phase-7-seo-securitySkill
- phase-8-reviewSkill
- phase-9-deploymentSkill
- plan-plusSkill
- pm-discoverySkill
- qa-phaseSkill
- rollbackSkill
- skill-createSkill
- skill-statusSkill
- sprintSkill
- starterSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 35
All API calls (including 200 OK)
- Distinctive: line 37
All important business events
- Distinctive: line 657
When implementing API/Backend:
- Distinctive: line 660
Add Request ID generation/propagation logic
- Distinctive: line 673
Document issues immediately when detected
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Zero Script QA Expert Knowledge
Overview
Zero Script QA is a methodology that verifies features through structured logs and real-time monitoring without writing test scripts.
Traditional: Write test code → Execute → Check results → Maintain
Zero Script: Build log infrastructure → Manual UX test → AI log analysis → Auto issue detectionCore Principles
1. Log Everything
- All API calls (including 200 OK)
- All errors
- All important business events
- Entire flow trackable via Request ID
2. Structured JSON Logs
- Parseable JSON format
- Consistent fields (timestamp, level, request_id, message, data)
- Different log levels per environment
3. Real-time Monitoring
- Docker log streaming
- Claude Code analyzes in real-time
- Immediate issue detection and documentation
Logging Architecture
JSON Log Format Standard
{
"timestamp": "2026-01-08T10:30:00.000Z",
"level": "INFO",
"service": "api",
"request_id": "req_abc123",
"message": "API Request completed",
"data": {
"method": "POST",
"path": "/api/users",
"status": 200,
"duration_ms": 45
}
}Required Log Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
| timestamp | ISO 8601 | Time of occurrence |
| level | string | DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR |
| service | string | Service name (api, web, worker, etc.) |
| request_id | string | Request tracking ID |
| message | string | Log message |
| data | object | Additional data (optional) |
Log Level Policy
| Environment | Minimum Level | Purpose |
| Local | DEBUG | Development and QA |
| Staging | DEBUG | QA and integration testing |
| Production | INFO | Operations monitoring |
Request ID Propagation
Concept
Client → API Gateway → Backend → Database
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
req_abc req_abc req_abc req_abc
Trackable with same Request ID across all layersImplementation Patterns
1. Request ID Generation (Entry Point)
// middleware.ts
import { v4 as uuidv4 } from 'uuid';
export function generateRequestId(): string {
return `req_${uuidv4().slice(0, 8)}`;
}
// Propagate via header
headers['X-Request-ID'] = requestId;2. Request ID Extraction and Propagation
// API client
const requestId = headers['X-Request-ID'] || generateRequestId();
// Include in all logs
logger.info('Processing request', { request_id: requestId });
// Include in header when calling downstream services
await fetch(url, {
headers: { 'X-Request-ID': requestId }
});Backend Logging (FastAPI)
Logging Middleware
# middleware/logging.py
import logging
import time
import uuid
import json
from fastapi import Request
class JsonFormatter(logging.Formatter):
def format(self, record):
log_record = {
"timestamp": self.formatTime(record),
"level": record.levelname,
"service": "api",
"request_id": getattr(record, 'request_id', 'N/A'),
"message": record.getMessage(),
}
if hasattr(record, 'data'):
log_record["data"] = record.data
return json.dumps(log_record)
class LoggingMiddleware:
async def __call__(self, request: Request, call_next):
request_id = request.headers.get('X-Request-ID', f'req_{uuid.uuid4().hex[:8]}')
request.state.request_id = request_id
start_time = time.time()
# Request logging
logger.info(
f"Request started",
extra={
'request_id': request_id,
'data': {
'method': request.method,
'path': request.url.path,
'query': str(request.query_params)
}
}
)
response = await call_next(request)
duration = (time.time() - start_time) * 1000
# Response logging (including 200 OK!)
logger.info(
f"Request completed",
extra={
'request_id': request_id,
'data': {
'status': response.status_code,
'duration_ms': round(duration, 2)
}
}
)
response.headers['X-Request-ID'] = request_id
return responseBusiness Logic Logging
# services/user_service.py
def create_user(data: dict, request_id: str):
logger.info("Creating user", extra={
'request_id': request_id,
'data': {'email': data['email']}
})
# Business logic
user = User(**data)
db.add(user)
db.commit()
logger.info("User created", extra={
'request_id': request_id,
'data': {'user_id': user.id}
})
return userFrontend Logging (Next.js)
Logger Module
// lib/logger.ts
type LogLevel = 'DEBUG' | 'INFO' | 'WARNING' | 'ERROR';
interface LogData {
request_id?: string;
[key: string]: any;
}
const LOG_LEVELS: Record<LogLevel, number> = {
DEBUG: 0,
INFO: 1,
WARNING: 2,
ERROR: 3,
};
const MIN_LEVEL = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' ? 'INFO' : 'DEBUG';
function log(level: LogLevel, message: string, data?: LogData) {
if (LOG_LEVELS[level] < LOG_LEVELS[MIN_LEVEL]) return;
const logEntry = {
timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
level,
service: 'web',
request_id: data?.request_id || 'N/A',
message,
data: data ? { ...data, request_id: undefined } : undefined,
};
console.log(JSON.stringify(logEntry));
}
export const logger = {
debug: (msg: string, data?: LogData) => log('DEBUG', msg, data),
info: (msg: string, data?: LogData) => log('INFO', msg, data),
warning: (msg: string, data?: LogData) => log('WARNING', msg, data),
error: (msg: string, data?: LogData) => log('ERROR', msg, data),
};API Client Integration
// lib/api-client.ts
import { logger } from './logger';
import { v4 as uuidv4 } from 'uuid';
export async function apiClient<T>(
endpoint: string,
options: RequestInit = {}
): Promise<T> {
const requestId = `req_${uuidv4().slice(0, 8)}`;
const startTime = Date.now();
logger.info('API Request started', {
request_id: requestId,
method: options.method || 'GET',
endpoint,
});
try {
const response = await fetch(`/api${endpoint}`, {
...options,
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'X-Request-ID': requestId,
...options.headers,
},
});
const duration = Date.now() - startTime;
const data = await response.json();
// Log 200 OK too!
logger.info('API Request completed', {
request_id: requestId,
status: response.status,
duration_ms: duration,
});
if (!response.ok) {
logger.error('API Request failed', {
request_id: requestId,
status: response.status,
error: data.error,
});
throw new ApiError(data.error);
}
return data;
} catch (error) {
logger.error('API Request error', {
request_id: requestId,
error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error',
});
throw error;
}
}Nginx JSON Logging
nginx.conf Configuration
http {
log_format json_combined escape=json '{'
'"timestamp":"$time_iso8601",'
'"level":"INFO",'
'"service":"nginx",'
'"request_id":"$http_x_request_id",'
'"message":"HTTP Request",'
'"data":{'
'"remote_addr":"$remote_addr",'
'"method":"$request_method",'
'"uri":"$request_uri",'
'"status":$status,'
'"body_bytes_sent":$body_bytes_sent,'
'"request_time":$request_time,'
'"upstream_response_time":"$upstream_response_time",'
'"http_referer":"$http_referer",'
'"http_user_agent":"$http_user_agent"'
'}'
'}';
access_log /var/log/nginx/access.log json_combined;
}Docker-Based QA Workflow
docker-compose.yml Configuration
version: '3.8'
services:
api:
build: ./backend
environment:
- LOG_LEVEL=DEBUG
- LOG_FORMAT=json
logging:
driver: json-file
options:
max-size: "10m"
max-file: "3"
web:
build: ./frontend
environment:
- NODE_ENV=development
depends_on:
- api
nginx:
image: nginx:alpine
volumes:
- ./nginx/nginx.conf:/etc/nginx/nginx.conf
ports:
- "80:80"
depends_on:
- api
- webReal-time Log Monitoring
# Stream all service logs
docker compose logs -f
# Specific service only
docker compose logs -f api
# Filter errors only
docker compose logs -f | grep '"level":"ERROR"'
# Track specific Request ID
docker compose logs -f | grep 'req_abc123'QA Automation Workflow
1. Start Environment
# Start development environment
docker compose up -d
# Start log monitoring (Claude Code monitors)
docker compose logs -f2. Manual UX Testing
User tests actual features in browser:
1. Sign up attempt
2. Login attempt
3. Use core features
4. Test edge cases3. Claude Code Log Analysis
Claude Code in real-time:
1. Monitor log stream
2. Detect error patterns
3. Detect abnormal response times
4. Track entire flow via Request ID
5. Auto-document issues4. Issue Documentation
# QA Issue Report
## Issues Found
### ISSUE-001: Insufficient error handling on login failure
- **Request ID**: req_abc123
- **Severity**: Medium
- **Reproduction path**: Login → Wrong password
- **Log**:
```json
{"level":"ERROR","message":"Login failed","data":{"error":"Invalid credentials"}}- Problem: Error message not user-friendly
- Recommended fix: Add error code to message mapping
---
## Issue Detection Patterns
### 1. Error Detection
```json
{"level":"ERROR","message":"..."}→ Report immediately
2. Slow Response Detection
{"data":{"duration_ms":3000}}→ Warning when exceeding 1000ms
3. Consecutive Failure Detection
3+ consecutive failures on same endpoint→ Report potential system issue
4. Abnormal Status Codes
{"data":{"status":500}}→ Report 5xx errors immediately
Phase Integration
| Phase | Zero Script QA Integration |
| Phase 4 (API) | API response logging verification |
| Phase 6 (UI) | Frontend logging verification |
| Phase 7 (Security) | Security event logging verification |
| Phase 8 (Review) | Log quality review |
| Phase 9 (Deployment) | Production log level configuration |
Iterative Test Cycle Pattern
Based on bkamp.ai notification feature development:
Example: 8-Cycle Test Process
| Cycle | Pass Rate | Bug Found | Fix Applied |
| 1st | 30% | DB schema mismatch | Schema migration |
| 2nd | 45% | NULL handling missing | Add null checks |
| 3rd | 55% | Routing error | Fix deeplinks |
| 4th | 65% | Type mismatch | Fix enum types |
| 5th | 70% | Calculation error | Fix count logic |
| 6th | 75% | Event missing | Add event triggers |
| 7th | 82% | Cache sync issue | Fix cache invalidation |
| 8th | 89% | Stable | Final polish |
Cycle Workflow
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Iterative Test Cycle │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Cycle N: │
│ 1. Run test script (E2E or manual) │
│ 2. Claude monitors logs in real-time │
│ 3. Record pass/fail results │
│ 4. Claude identifies root cause of failures │
│ 5. Fix code immediately (hot reload) │
│ 6. Document: Cycle N → Bug → Fix │
│ │
│ Repeat until acceptable pass rate (>85%) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘E2E Test Script Template
#!/bin/bash
# E2E Test Script Template
API_URL="http://localhost:8000"
TOKEN="your-test-token"
PASS_COUNT=0
FAIL_COUNT=0
SKIP_COUNT=0
GREEN='\033[0;32m'
RED='\033[0;31m'
YELLOW='\033[0;33m'
NC='\033[0m'
test_feature_action() {
echo -n "Testing: Feature action... "
response=$(curl -s -X POST "$API_URL/api/v1/feature/action" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"param": "value"}')
if [[ "$response" == *"expected_result"* ]]; then
echo -e "${GREEN}✅ PASS${NC}"
((PASS_COUNT++))
else
echo -e "${RED}❌ FAIL${NC}"
echo "Response: $response"
((FAIL_COUNT++))
fi
}
# Run all tests
test_feature_action
# ... more tests
# Summary
echo ""
echo "═══════════════════════════════════════"
echo "Test Results:"
echo -e " ${GREEN}✅ PASS: $PASS_COUNT${NC}"
echo -e " ${RED}❌ FAIL: $FAIL_COUNT${NC}"
echo -e " ${YELLOW}⏭️ SKIP: $SKIP_COUNT${NC}"
echo "═══════════════════════════════════════"Test Cycle Documentation Template
# Feature Test Results - Cycle N
## Summary
- **Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
- **Feature**: {feature name}
- **Pass Rate**: N%
- **Tests**: X passed / Y total
## Results
| Test Case | Status | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Test 1 | ✅ | |
| Test 2 | ❌ | {error description} |
| Test 3 | ⏭️ | {skip reason} |
## Bugs Found
### BUG-001: {Title}
- **Root Cause**: {description}
- **Fix**: {what was changed}
- **Files**: `path/to/file.py:123`
## Next Cycle Plan
- {what to test next}Checklist
Logging Infrastructure
- JSON log format applied
- Request ID generation and propagation
- Log level settings per environment
- Docker logging configuration
Backend Logging
- Logging middleware implemented
- All API calls logged (including 200 OK)
- Business logic logging
- Detailed error logging
Frontend Logging
- Logger module implemented
- API client integration
- Error boundary logging
QA Workflow
- Docker Compose configured
- Real-time monitoring ready
- Issue documentation template ready
Auto-Apply Rules
When Building Logging Infrastructure
When implementing API/Backend:
- Suggest logging middleware creation
- Suggest JSON format logger setup
- Add Request ID generation/propagation logic
When implementing Frontend:
- Suggest Logger module creation
- Suggest logging integration with API client
- Suggest including Request ID header
When Performing QA
On test request:
- Guide to run
docker compose logs -f - Request manual UX testing from user
- Real-time log monitoring
- Document issues immediately when detected
- Provide fix suggestions
Issue Detection Thresholds
| Severity | Condition | Action |
| Critical | level: ERROR or status: 5xx | Immediate report |
| Critical | duration_ms > 3000 | Immediate report |
| Critical | 3+ consecutive failures | Immediate report |
| Warning | status: 401, 403 | Warning report |
| Warning | duration_ms > 1000 | Warning report |
| Info | Missing log fields | Note for improvement |
| Info | Request ID not propagated | Note for improvement |
Required Logging Locations
Backend (FastAPI/Express)
✅ Request start (method, path, params)
✅ Request complete (status, duration_ms)
✅ Major business logic steps
✅ Detailed info on errors
✅ Before/after external API calls
✅ DB queries (in development)Frontend (Next.js/React)
✅ API call start
✅ API response received (status, duration)
✅ Detailed info on errors
✅ Important user actionsDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

