agentleFS
popup-studio-aipopup-studio-ai/bkit-claude-code/skills/bkit-templates/SKILL.md

bkit-templates

Skill605 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

PDCA + Sprint document templates — Plan, Design, Analysis, Report for individual features plus templates/sprint/{master-plan, prd, plan, design, iterate, qa, report}.template.md for sprint-level documents (v2.1.13). Triggers: template, plan document, design template

3 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    All documents should include:

    line 135
  2. Distinctive:

    Use _INDEX.md in each folder:

    line 176

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

bkit Document Templates

Use these templates when generating PDCA documents.

Available Templates

PDCA (per-feature, 9-phase)

TemplatePathPurpose
Plan${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/plan.template.mdFeature planning
Design${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/design.template.mdTechnical design
Analysis${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/analysis.template.mdGap analysis
Report${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/report.template.mdCompletion report
Index${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/_INDEX.template.mdDocument index
CLAUDE${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/CLAUDE.template.mdCLAUDE.md template

Sprint (multi-feature container, 8-phase, v2.1.13)

TemplatePathPurpose
Master Plan${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/sprint/master-plan.template.mdSprint scope + features + dependency graph + Trust scope
PRD${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/sprint/prd.template.mdSprint-level product requirements
Plan${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/sprint/plan.template.mdSprint plan (per-feature plan synthesis)
Design${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/sprint/design.template.mdSprint-level technical design
Iterate${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/sprint/iterate.template.mdIteration log + iterateHistory
QA${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/sprint/qa.template.md7-Layer dataFlowIntegrity (S1) report
Report${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/sprint/report.template.mdSprint completion + KPI + carry items

Template Usage

Plan Template

For Plan phase - feature planning before design.

Key sections:

  • Overview & Purpose
  • Scope (In/Out)
  • Requirements (Functional/Non-Functional)
  • Success Criteria
  • Risks & Mitigation

Design Template

For Do phase - technical design before implementation.

Key sections:

  • Architecture (diagrams, data flow)
  • Data Model (entities, relationships)
  • API Specification (endpoints, request/response)
  • UI/UX Design (layouts, components)
  • Error Handling
  • Security Considerations
  • Test Plan
  • Implementation Guide

Analysis Template

For Check phase - gap analysis between design and implementation.

Key sections:

  • Design vs Implementation comparison
  • Missing features
  • Inconsistencies
  • Quality metrics
  • Recommendations

Report Template

For Act phase - completion report and lessons learned.

Key sections:

  • Summary of completed work
  • Metrics (LOC, test coverage, etc.)
  • Issues encountered
  • Lessons learned
  • Future improvements

Document Output Paths

docs/
├── 01-plan/
│   └── features/
│       └── {feature}.plan.md
├── 02-design/
│   └── features/
│       └── {feature}.design.md
├── 03-analysis/
│   └── features/
│       └── {feature}.analysis.md
└── 04-report/
    └── features/
        └── {feature}.report.md

Variable Substitution

Templates use {variable} syntax:

  • {feature}: Feature name
  • {date}: Creation date (YYYY-MM-DD)
  • {author}: Document author

Pipeline Templates

Additional templates for Development Pipeline phases:

  • ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/pipeline/ directory

Document Standards

File Naming Rules

{number}_{english_name}.md      # 01_system_architecture.md
{number}-{english_name}.md      # 01-system-architecture.md
{feature}.{type}.md             # login.design.md

Common Header

All documents should include:

# {Document Title}

> **Summary**: {One-line description}
>
> **Author**: {Name}
> **Created**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
> **Last Modified**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
> **Status**: {Draft | Review | Approved | Deprecated}

---

Version Control

Track changes within documents:

## Version History

| Version | Date | Changes | Author |
|---------|------|---------|--------|
| 1.0 | 2024-12-01 | Initial draft | Kay |
| 1.1 | 2024-12-05 | Added API spec | Kay |

Cross-References

Link related documents:

## Related Documents
- Plan: [login.plan.md](../01-plan/features/login.plan.md)
- Design: [login.design.md](../02-design/features/login.design.md)
- Analysis: [login.analysis.md](../03-analysis/features/login.analysis.md)

Status Tracking

Use _INDEX.md in each folder:

StatusMeaningClaude Behavior
✅ ApprovedUse as referenceFollow as-is
🔄 In ProgressBeing writtenNotify of changes
⏸️ On HoldTemporarily pausedRequest confirmation
❌ DeprecatedNo longer validIgnore

Conflict Resolution

  • Code vs Design mismatch: Code is truth, suggest document update
  • Multiple versions: Reference only the latest version

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.