technical-docs
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write API references, user guides, setup manuals and architecture docs with consistent terminology. Use when writing developer documentation, API guides, or tutorials.
- Reads credentials
- Installs packages
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- oqtopus-team/qdashtheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- getsentry/sentry-docstheir own version, first seen Jan 27, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- getsentry/sentry-docs★ 449same name
- oqtopus-team/qdash★ 54same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- book-writingSkill
- executive-summarySkill
- feedback-writingSkill
- grant-writingSkill
- historical-accuracySkill
- job-descriptionsSkill
- line-editingSkill
- longform-book-authorSkill
- marketing-copywriterSkill
- meeting-notesSkill
- screenplay-writerSkill
- screenwritingSkill
- sop-writingSkill
- talk-writingSkill
- technical-writerSkill
- thread-to-articleSkill
- thread-to-blog-converterSkill
- translationSkill
- writing-tasteSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 60
Before writing: Who is reading this and what do they already know?
- Distinctive: line 63
Executive summaries: No technical detail, focus on business outcomes
- Distinctive: line 73
Prefer concrete, actionable steps over vague advice — the user needs executable output.
- Distinctive: line 74
Ask for missing context only when it blocks a correct answer.
- Distinctive: line 75
Do not invent personal identities, third-party credits, or external source claims.
- Distinctive: line 78
Write README files that make developers want to use a project within the first 30 seconds
- Distinctive: line 79
Create API reference docs that are complete, accurate, and include working code examples
- Distinctive: line 81
Write conceptual guides that explain *why*, not just *how*
- Distinctive: line 88
Create contribution guides that make it easy for engineers to write good docs
- Distinctive: line 96
Use clear headings and bullet lists where helpful.
- Distinctive: line 97
Call out assumptions and open questions at the end.
- Distinctive: line 109
NEVER invent statistics, quotes, or sources.
- Distinctive: line 110
NEVER present an unverified figure as sourced.
- Distinctive: line 111
NEVER bury the central point below preamble the reader will not reach.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Technical Docs
Technical documentation serves four distinct modes (the Divio framework: Tutorials, How-To Guides, Reference, and Explanation). Documentation fails when these modes blur — such as when setup tutorials detour into deep architecture, or when API reference pages lack reproducible request and response payloads.
Process
- Classify documentation intent (Tutorial, How-To, Reference, or Architectural Explanation).
- Establish reader prerequisites, environment requirements, and required tokens/keys.
- Structure procedures with sequential, imperative, single-action steps.
- Provide complete, runnable code examples with expected output.
- Standardize domain terminology in a structured glossary.
Output Format
Technical Documentation: [Topic]
Overview
[One-paragraph plain English summary of what this component accomplishes and why it exists]
Prerequisites
- Node.js >= 20.0.0 or Python >= 3.11
- Environment variable
API_KEYconfigured in.env
Quickstart / How-It-Works
- Step 1: Install Dependencies:
npm install @company/sdk - Step 2: Initialize Client:
import { Client } from "@company/sdk"; const client = new Client({ apiKey: process.env.API_KEY }); - Step 3: Execute Operation:
const res = await client.resources.get("id_123"); console.log(res.data);
API Reference / Schema
- Endpoint:
POST /api/v1/resources - Headers:
Authorization: Bearer <token>,Content-Type: application/json - Request Body:
{ "name": "sample", "tier": "standard" } - Response
201 Created:{ "id": "res_987", "status": "active" }
Glossary & Terminology
| Term | Definition | Context / Scope |
| Idempotency Key | Unique header to prevent duplicate charge execution | All mutation endpoints |
| Tenant ID | UUID representing the client organization partition | Multi-tenant auth token |
Audience-First Writing
Before writing: Who is reading this and what do they already know?
- Developer docs: Technical terms OK, code examples, values precision
- End-user guides: Minimal technical knowledge assumed, task-oriented, screenshots
- Executive summaries: No technical detail, focus on business outcomes
Documentation Types (Divio System)
- Tutorials: Learning-oriented, hold reader's hand to first success
- How-to Guides: Goal-oriented, step-by-step for known goals
- Reference: Information-oriented, complete and accurate, dense
- Explanations: Understanding-oriented, background and context
Style Rules
Active voice, one action per step, consistent terminology, test your own instructions.
Critical rules
- Prefer concrete, actionable steps over vague advice — the user needs executable output.
- Ask for missing context only when it blocks a correct answer; otherwise state assumptions.
- Do not invent personal identities, third-party credits, or external source claims.
Additional notes (merged)
- Write README files that make developers want to use a project within the first 30 seconds
- Create API reference docs that are complete, accurate, and include working code examples
- Build step-by-step tutorials that guide beginners from zero to working in under 15 minutes
- Write conceptual guides that explain why, not just how
- Set up documentation pipelines using Docusaurus, MkDocs, Sphinx, or VitePress
- Automate API reference generation from OpenAPI/Swagger specs, JSDoc, or docstrings
- Integrate docs builds into CI/CD so outdated docs fail the build
- Maintain versioned documentation alongside versioned software releases
- Audit existing docs for accuracy, gaps, and stale content
- Define documentation standards and templates for engineering teams
- Create contribution guides that make it easy for engineers to write good docs
- Measure documentation effectiveness with analytics, support ticket correlation, and user feedback
- Code examples must run — every snippet is tested before it ships
- No assumption of context — every doc stands alone or links to prerequisite context explicitly
- Keep voice consistent — second person ("you"), present tense, active voice throughout
- Version everything — docs must match the software version they describe
- One concept per section — do not combine installation, configuration, and usage into one wall of text
- Lead with the result the user asked for.
- Use clear headings and bullet lists where helpful.
- Call out assumptions and open questions at the end.
- Stay specific to the Technical Writer workflow; avoid generic filler.
Verification & Quality Checklist
- Every factual claim and statistic traced to a citable source.
- Reading level and terminology matched to the stated audience.
- Length and formatting fit the destination channel's limits.
- One clear call to action, placed where the reader will still be reading.
Anti-Patterns & Constraints
- NEVER invent statistics, quotes, or sources.
- NEVER present an unverified figure as sourced.
- NEVER bury the central point below preamble the reader will not reach.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

