book-writing
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Develop book-length work: premise, chapter architecture, narrative voice, and full revision. Use when structuring non-fiction books or manuscripts.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- revfactory/claude-code-startertheir own version, first seen Mar 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- revfactory/claude-code-starter★ 9same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- executive-summarySkill
- feedback-writingSkill
- grant-writingSkill
- historical-accuracySkill
- job-descriptionsSkill
- line-editingSkill
- longform-book-authorSkill
- marketing-copywriterSkill
- meeting-notesSkill
- screenplay-writerSkill
- screenwritingSkill
- sop-writingSkill
- talk-writingSkill
- technical-docsSkill
- technical-writerSkill
- thread-to-articleSkill
- thread-to-blog-converterSkill
- translationSkill
- writing-tasteSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
If the premise requires a paragraph of explanation, the thesis is unfocused.
- Distinctive: line 43
Never introduce competing conceptual models within a single chapter.
- Distinctive: line 51
Read aloud to identify clumsy phrasing, varying sentence cadence and killing weak passive verbs.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
book-writing
Core Philosophy
Writing a non-fiction book is not expanding a 1,000-word blog post with 200 pages of repetitive filler. A book is an extended cognitive journey that fundamentally shifts how the reader perceives reality. Sustaining reader momentum across 60,000 words requires an undeniable core premise, a disciplined chapter architecture, a consistent narrative voice, and a systematic multi-pass developmental revision process.
4-Step Non-Fiction Book Crafting Architecture
Step 1: The Core Premise & Reader Contract
- The Single Organizing Idea (SOI):
- Formulate the book's foundational argument in strictly one sentence:
- Example: "Software reliability is an organizational culture problem that cannot be solved by purchasing more monitoring tools."
- If the premise requires a paragraph of explanation, the thesis is unfocused.
- Formulate the book's foundational argument in strictly one sentence:
- The Reader Transformation Contract:
- Explicitly define: Who is the reader at Chapter 1 (Current Pain & Mental Model) vs who do they become by Chapter 10 (Transformed Capability & Worldview)?
Step 2: Macro Chapter Architecture (The 10-Chapter Arc)
- The 3-Act Non-Fiction Structure:
- Act I: The Broken Paradigm (Chapters 1–2): The status quo, why current solutions fail, the true cost of inaction.
- Act II: The New Framework (Chapters 3–7): The core methodology, core mechanisms, worked case studies, and counter-intuitive principles.
- Act III: Mastery & Implementation (Chapters 8–10): Organizational rollout, handling edge cases, future evolution.
- The Fractal Chapter Template (4,000–6,000 words):
- The Hook & Narrative Case Study (1,000 words): Human drama, visceral stakes.
- The Conceptual Breakthrough (1,500 words): The mental model and framework diagram.
- Actionable Implementation & Proof (2,000 words): Concrete steps, code/data evidence.
- Objections & Counter-Arguments (800 words): Dismantling skeptic rebuttals.
- Chapter Summary & Action Checklist (200 words).
Step 3: Sustaining Narrative Velocity & Voice
- Show vs Tell with Sensory Grounding:
- Ground abstract theories in physical reality: names, timestamps, exact dollar figures, terminal error messages, room temperatures.
- The "One Major Idea Per Chapter" Rule:
- Never introduce competing conceptual models within a single chapter. Subordinate all research and anecdotes to that chapter's primary thesis.
Step 4: The 3-Pass Revision Methodology
- Pass 1: Structural & Developmental Edit:
- Audit chapter order, identify logical gaps, cut redundant chapters entirely.
- Pass 2: The Scene & Argument Polish:
- Strengthen case study evidence; sharpen analytical frameworks.
- Pass 3: Line & Rhythm Edit:
- Read aloud to identify clumsy phrasing, varying sentence cadence and killing weak passive verbs.
Deliverable Format: Book Proposal & Architecture Blueprint (BOOK-PROPOSAL.md)
# Non-Fiction Book Proposal & Architecture: [Working Title]
## 1. Core Thesis & Target Reader
- **Working Title**: [Title: Subtitle]
- **Core Premise (1 Sentence)**: [Single organizing idea]
- **Target Audience**: [Specific professional persona, e.g. Senior Engineering Leaders]
- **Target Word Count**: 55,000 words (10 Chapters @ ~5,500 words/chapter)
## 2. Competitive Title Analysis
- *Book A (Competitor)*: Strong on theory, lacks tactical code/architecture examples.
- *Our Differentiation*: Practical engineering playbook with real post-mortems and code.
## 3. Chapter-by-Chapter Architecture
### Chapter 1: The Illusion of Microservice Velocity
- **Core Argument**: Microservices adopted prematurely introduce distributed systems latency without organizational benefits.
- **Narrative Anchor Case Study**: The 2024 Black Friday outage at [Fintech Startup].
- **Key Framework**: The Distributed Complexity Tipping Point Matrix.
### Chapter 2: The Modular Monolith Alternative
- **Core Argument**: In-process domain isolation provides microservice boundaries with zero network latency.
- **Key Framework**: The Hexagonal Architecture boundary design.Worked Example: Technical Architecture Book Outlining
- Thesis: "Observability without automated remediations creates alert fatigue that slows incident recovery."
- Execution: Structured 8 chapters. Chapter 3 detailed a true enterprise outage where 1,400 Slack alerts fired in 3 minutes, paralyzing on-call engineers.
- Outcome: Secured literary agent and top publisher contract based on a 15-page proposal and 2 sample chapters.
Verification Checklist
- Core premise is formulated in a single, falsifiable declarative sentence.
- Every chapter follows a consistent fractal structure with real case studies.
- Explicit reader transformation arc (Before vs After) is defined.
- Competitive book analysis outlines clear differentiation.
- Revision methodology includes separate structural, argument, and line editing passes.
Anti-Patterns
- The Blog Anthology: Stapling 15 unrelated blog posts together and calling it a book.
- Scope Explosion: Trying to explain the entire history of computing instead of solving one specific problem.
- Writing Without Outlining: Writing 30,000 words before realizing Chapter 4 contradicts Chapter 1.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

