release-review
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
发布审查——对发布就绪状态进行独立审查。覆盖CI/CD和发布阶段。质量保障SKILL,由Reviewer Agent调用。
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- arvindand/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- pariveo/salesforce-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- Shri-Phnx/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- m4r1k/Enerutheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- SoftBlack42/StarPietheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- nielsmadan/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 5, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- SoftBlack42/StarPie★ 1.3ksame name
- m4r1k/Eneru★ 151same name
- arvindand/agent-skills★ 17same name
- pariveo/salesforce-agent-skills★ 2same name
- Shri-Phnx/claude-skills★ 2same name
- nielsmadan/skills★ 1same name
- indyforge/knowledge-forge★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- code-reviewSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- main-workflowSkill
- okrSkill
- pr-faqSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- requirement-clarificationSkill
- requirement-reviewSkill
- retro-meetingSkill
- retro-reviewSkill
- six-pagerSkill
- software-project-governanceSkill
- stage-architectureSkill
- stage-cicdSkill
- stage-developmentSkill
- stage-infraSkill
- stage-initiationSkill
- stage-maintenanceSkill
- stage-operationsSkill
- stage-releaseSkill
- stage-researchSkill
- stage-selectionSkill
- stage-testingSkill
- tech-reviewSkill
- test-reviewSkill
The file
Files
发布审查
本 SKILL 用于 CI/CD(stage-cicd)和版本发布(stage-release)阶段的独立发布审查。由 Reviewer Agent 执行。
循环角色
版本背景:本循环语义于 0.65.0 引入;本标题是稳定规范,不随版本号变更。
角色映射: 在目标 Loop 模型中,本审查对应 Middle loop 的 loop-exit-gate 与 Outer loop 的 loop-entry-gate。0.66.1 的当前运行能力仍是 experimental scaffolding;该映射不表示持久化 Loop runtime 已激活。
当前可执行行为仅为 Coordinator M7.4 的 NEEDS_CHANGE -> 返工 -> 复审,以及 Check 30 对复审链终态、轮次连续性和熔断结果的校验。
<!-- loop-runtime-target:{"claim_id":"LRC-RELEASE-PLANNED-001","target_version":"0.68.0","status":"planned_not_active"} -->持久化 release-to-testing-rework back-edge、flow-unit loop_count、Middle fuse、PARO transition 与自动升级属于 0.68.0 规划,当前不生效。
Reviewer 只审查并输出结论,不修改产品代码。Reviewer 必须输出 APPROVED、APPROVED_WITH_NOTES、NEEDS_CHANGE 或 BLOCKED;APPROVED_WITH_NOTES 是保留备注的通过终态,只能用于没有未解决 BLOCKING finding 的审查,不得包含未解决的 BLOCKING finding。APPROVED_WITH_NOTES 的审查输出与 REVIEW 证据 MUST 包含独立结构字段 unresolved_blockers=0;字段缺失、非零、非法或重复矛盾时不得通过,自然语言中偶然出现的 blocking 不构成该事实。NEEDS_CHANGE(及兼容输入 NEEDS_CHANGES)不是终态,Coordinator 必须在返工后发起下一轮复审。终态证据由 Check 30 的复审链消费:APPROVED 与 APPROVED_WITH_NOTES 可以通过并结束复审链;BLOCKED 结束链路但不是通过,必须 escalation;NEEDS_CHANGE(S)、未知或格式错误结论必须 fail-closed。超过复审 fuse 的 NEEDS_CHANGE 必须升级为 BLOCKED。
依据 ADR §3.5(loop-engineering-architecture-0.65.0)。完整映射见 共享循环角色映射。
审查对象
| 产出物 | 来源阶段 | 审查重点 |
| CI/CD 流水线配置 | CI/CD | 质量门禁是否有效?阻断条件是否正确? |
| 发布检查清单 | 发布 | 所有检查项是否通过?是否有遗漏? |
| Changelog | 发布 | 变更描述是否准确?Breaking change 是否标注? |
| 回滚方案 | 发布 | 回滚步骤是否可执行?回滚时间是否可接受? |
审查维度
1. 发布就绪
- 所有 Gate 检查是否通过(G1-G8)?
- 是否有未解决的 BLOCKING 问题?
- P0 任务是否全部完成?
2. 质量门禁
- CI 流水线是否全部通过?
- 代码覆盖率是否满足基线?
- 安全扫描是否通过?
3. 回滚能力
- 回滚方案是否已演练(至少一次)?
- 回滚时间是否在 SLA 范围内?
- 数据回滚是否已考虑(schema 变更、数据迁移)?
4. 用户影响
- Breaking change 是否有迁移指南?
- 用户通知是否已发出?
- 监控和告警是否已配置?
审查流程
- 读取产出物:加载发布检查清单、changelog、回滚方案
- 逐维度审查:按上述 4 个维度检查
- 标注发现:BLOCKING / WARNING / SUGGESTION
- 输出审查结论:APPROVED / APPROVED_WITH_NOTES / NEEDS_CHANGE / BLOCKED
- 返回 Coordinator:审查报告 + 结论
事实依据红线:
- 发布 APPROVED 只能基于可复查事实:命令输出、CI/测试结果、tag/commit、release docs、风险/证据记录。
- 未实际运行的检查 MUST 标为“未验证/待验证/BLOCKED”,不得写成通过。
- 禁止用假设、猜测、推测、估计、编造或幻觉替代发布证据。
审查结论
- APPROVED:发布就绪,可以执行
- APPROVED_WITH_NOTES:无未解决 BLOCKING finding;保留并跟踪非阻塞发布备注后通过
- NEEDS_CHANGE:存在需修复的发布风险
- BLOCKED:不可发布,需回退到开发/测试阶段修复
自检
- 所有 Gate 是否通过?CI 是否绿色?
- 回滚方案是否可执行(非理论)?
- Breaking change 是否有迁移指南?
- 监控告警是否已配置且可触发?
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

