agentleFS
peopleforresterpeopleforrester/claude-dotfiles/skills/development/refactoring-guide/SKILL.md

refactoring-guide

Skill3 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Safe refactoring patterns and techniques. Use when the user wants to improve code structure, reduce duplication, or make code more maintainable without changing behavior. Emphasizes incremental changes with test coverage.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before adding new features to messy code

    line 26
  2. Distinctive:

    Never refactor without tests: - Ensure behavior is preserved

    line 32
  3. Distinctive:

    No test coverage exists (write tests first)

    line 249

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Refactoring Guide

Improve code structure safely without changing behavior.

When to Use

  • User asks to "clean up" or "refactor" code
  • Code smells detected during review
  • Before adding new features to messy code
  • Reducing duplication
  • Improving readability

Golden Rules

  1. Never refactor without tests - Ensure behavior is preserved
  2. Small steps - One change at a time, run tests after each
  3. No behavior changes - Refactoring ≠ fixing bugs or adding features
  4. Commit often - Easy to revert if something breaks

Refactoring Process

1. Ensure tests exist and pass
   ↓
2. Identify the code smell
   ↓
3. Choose appropriate refactoring technique
   ↓
4. Make small change
   ↓
5. Run tests
   ↓
6. Commit if green, revert if red
   ↓
7. Repeat until done

Common Code Smells

Long Function

Symptom: Function > 20-30 lines, multiple responsibilities

Refactoring: Extract Method

// Before
function processOrder(order: Order) {
  // Validate order (10 lines)
  // Calculate totals (15 lines)
  // Apply discounts (12 lines)
  // Update inventory (8 lines)
  // Send confirmation (10 lines)
}

// After
function processOrder(order: Order) {
  validateOrder(order);
  const totals = calculateTotals(order);
  const finalTotal = applyDiscounts(totals, order.discounts);
  updateInventory(order.items);
  sendConfirmation(order, finalTotal);
}

Duplicate Code

Symptom: Similar code in multiple places

Refactoring: Extract to shared function

// Before
function getUserName(user: User) {
  return `${user.firstName} ${user.lastName}`.trim();
}

function getCustomerName(customer: Customer) {
  return `${customer.firstName} ${customer.lastName}`.trim();
}

// After
function formatFullName(entity: { firstName: string; lastName: string }) {
  return `${entity.firstName} ${entity.lastName}`.trim();
}

Long Parameter List

Symptom: Function with > 3-4 parameters

Refactoring: Introduce Parameter Object

// Before
function createUser(
  name: string,
  email: string,
  age: number,
  address: string,
  phone: string,
  role: string
) { ... }

// After
interface CreateUserInput {
  name: string;
  email: string;
  age: number;
  address: string;
  phone: string;
  role: string;
}

function createUser(input: CreateUserInput) { ... }

Nested Conditionals

Symptom: Deep if/else nesting

Refactoring: Guard Clauses / Early Returns

// Before
function getDiscount(user: User) {
  if (user) {
    if (user.isActive) {
      if (user.isPremium) {
        return 0.2;
      } else {
        return 0.1;
      }
    }
  }
  return 0;
}

// After
function getDiscount(user: User) {
  if (!user) return 0;
  if (!user.isActive) return 0;
  if (user.isPremium) return 0.2;
  return 0.1;
}

Magic Numbers/Strings

Symptom: Unexplained literal values in code

Refactoring: Extract Constant

// Before
if (user.age >= 21) { ... }
if (status === 'PNDG') { ... }

// After
const MINIMUM_AGE = 21;
const ORDER_STATUS = {
  PENDING: 'PNDG',
  COMPLETE: 'CMPL',
} as const;

if (user.age >= MINIMUM_AGE) { ... }
if (status === ORDER_STATUS.PENDING) { ... }

Feature Envy

Symptom: Method uses data from another class more than its own

Refactoring: Move Method

// Before
class Order {
  getCustomerDiscount() {
    if (this.customer.loyaltyYears > 5) {
      return this.customer.baseDiscount * 1.5;
    }
    return this.customer.baseDiscount;
  }
}

// After
class Customer {
  getDiscount() {
    if (this.loyaltyYears > 5) {
      return this.baseDiscount * 1.5;
    }
    return this.baseDiscount;
  }
}

Refactoring Techniques

SmellTechnique
Long functionExtract Method
Duplicate codeExtract Function/Class
Long parameter listParameter Object
Nested conditionalsGuard Clauses
Magic valuesExtract Constant
Feature envyMove Method
Large classExtract Class
Primitive obsessionValue Object
Switch statementsReplace with Polymorphism

Safety Checklist

Before refactoring:

  • Tests exist and pass
  • Understand current behavior
  • Identify specific smell to address

During refactoring:

  • One change at a time
  • Run tests after each change
  • Commit when green

After refactoring:

  • All tests still pass
  • Code is more readable
  • No behavior changed
  • Review the diff

When NOT to Refactor

  • No test coverage exists (write tests first)
  • Under tight deadline (technical debt is okay temporarily)
  • Code is being deleted soon
  • You don't understand the code fully

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.