agentleFS
pecigonzalopecigonzalo/agent-skills/skills/standards-testing/SKILL.md

standards-testing

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use this skill whenever you write or review unit, integration, or end-to-end tests, including test structure, isolation, fakes, and behavior-focused assertions, even when the user only asks for a quick test. Use role-qa-engineer for broader strategy, coverage planning, and edge-case analysis, and standards-go-testing for Go specifics.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Golden Rule: If you can't test it easily, refactor it

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Independent tests: No shared state, run in any order

    line 32
  3. Distinctive:

    Golden Rule: If you can't test it easily, refactor it.

    line 132

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Testing Standards

Provides: AAA pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert) structure, coverage goals, test level guidance, and testing checklists.

Quick Reference

Golden Rule: If you can't test it easily, refactor it

AAA Pattern: Arrange → Act → Assert

Test (✅ DO):

  • Happy path, edge cases, error cases
  • Business logic, public APIs

Don't Test (❌ DON'T):

  • Third-party libraries, framework internals
  • Simple getters/setters, private details

Coverage: Critical (100%), High (90%+), Medium (80%+)


Principles

Test behavior, not implementation: Focus on what code does, not how Keep tests simple: One assertion per test, clear names, minimal setup Independent tests: No shared state, run in any order Fast and reliable: Quick execution, no flaky tests, deterministic

Test Structure (AAA Pattern)

test('calculateTotal returns sum of item prices', () => {
  // Arrange - Set up test data
  const items = [{ price: 10 }, { price: 20 }, { price: 30 }];
  
  // Act - Execute code
  const result = calculateTotal(items);
  
  // Assert - Verify result
  expect(result).toBe(60);
});

What to Test

✅ DO Test

  • Happy path (normal usage)
  • Edge cases (boundaries, empty, null, undefined)
  • Error cases (invalid input, failures)
  • Business logic (core functionality)
  • Public APIs (exported functions)

❌ DON'T Test

  • Third-party libraries
  • Framework internals
  • Simple getters/setters
  • Private implementation details

Coverage Goals

  1. Critical: Business logic, data transformations (100%)
  2. High: Public APIs, user-facing features (90%+)
  3. Medium: Utilities, helpers (80%+)
  4. Low: Simple wrappers, configs (optional)

Testing Pure Functions

function add(a, b) { return a + b; }

test('add returns sum', () => {
  expect(add(2, 3)).toBe(5);
  expect(add(-1, 1)).toBe(0);
  expect(add(0, 0)).toBe(0);
});

Testing with Dependencies

// Testable with dependency injection
function createUserService(database) {
  return {
    getUser: (id) => database.findById('users', id)
  };
}

// Test with mock
test('getUser retrieves from database', () => {
  const mockDb = {
    findById: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({ id: 1, name: 'John' })
  };
  
  const service = createUserService(mockDb);
  const user = service.getUser(1);
  
  expect(mockDb.findById).toHaveBeenCalledWith('users', 1);
  expect(user).toEqual({ id: 1, name: 'John' });
});

Test Naming

// ✅ Good: Descriptive, clear expectation
test('calculateDiscount returns 10% off for premium users', () => {});
test('validateEmail returns false for invalid format', () => {});
test('createUser throws error when email exists', () => {});

// ❌ Bad: Vague, unclear
test('it works', () => {});
test('test user', () => {});

Best Practices

✅ Test one thing per test ✅ Use descriptive test names ✅ Keep tests independent ✅ Mock external dependencies ✅ Test edge cases and errors ✅ Make tests readable ✅ Run tests frequently ✅ Fix failing tests immediately

Golden Rule: If you can't test it easily, refactor it.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.