dealbreaker
Skill3 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Builds an offer too good to refuse. Lists every problem the buyer hits on the way to the result they want, turns each into a solution, trims to what is cheap to deliver and valuable to the buyer, and stacks it with honest bonuses, a guarantee the CFO can afford, real urgency and a clear name. Scores it on the value equation (outcome, likelihood, time, effort) and re-tests it on a quick buyer panel. Use when the user says "make my offer better", "why won't people buy", "what should I include", "guarantee", "bonuses", "grand slam offer", or after the panel shows people passing.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- burn-testSkill
- first-dollarSkill
- ground-truthSkill
- handshakeSkill
- kill-or-buildSkill
- litmusSkill
- prove-itSkill
- reality-checkSkill
- receiptsSkill
- shark-boardSkill
- signalSkill
- straight-talkSkill
- truth-serumSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 23
Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../receipts/rules.md first.
- Distinctive: line 37
Before the full offer, design the first one: the smallest real commitment a stranger would make with no references.
- Distinctive: line 48
Write every obstacle between the buyer and the result they want, in the buyer's words: before buying (doubt, price, effort to switch), …
- Distinctive: line 63
Urgency and scarcity: only if they are true (a launch week, a limited first batch).
- Very specific: line 89
Write the new offer into founder/pitch.md (keep the old one as founder/pitch-v1.md) and run /truth-serum --quick with the same seed.
- Distinctive: line 102
Every promise must be deliverable and affordable.
- Distinctive: line 105
No fake reviews, testimonials, scarcity, discounts or "as seen on".
- Distinctive: line 106
Follow the advertising and consumer-protection rules of the user's market for guarantees and claims (health claims especially).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
dealbreaker
Most businesses sell a product. Good ones sell an offer: the product plus
everything that makes buying it an easy yes. This skill builds that, using the
Offers lens in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../shark-board/lenses.md as the method (a
summary of the framework in Alex Hormozi's $100M Offers; never present it as
his words).
Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../receipts/rules.md first. An offer is a
set of promises. Every promise is PLANNED until it has been delivered and
measured, and the offer must say it that way.
Step 1: read what is already known
founder/idea.mdandfounder/pitch.md: what is sold today.founder/panel/results.md: why buyers pass, in their words. This is the raw material: every top objection should be answered by something in the offer.founder/numbers.json: what each extra costs, so the stack stays profitable.founder/board.md: the board's conditions.
Step 1b: the first yes
Before the full offer, design the first one: the smallest real commitment a
stranger would make with no references. For a shop, a launch-day price or a
founding-member card. For a business sold to businesses, a time-boxed pilot on
their own numbers (two to eight weeks, one workflow, a success line written in
advance, a clear end: roll into the standard price or remove it and owe
nothing). Use the pilot offer shape in
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../handshake/receivers.md. The full offer below is
what the pilot rolls into.
Step 2: the problem list
Write every obstacle between the buyer and the result they want, in the buyer's words: before buying (doubt, price, effort to switch), during (waiting, learning, inconvenience), after (does it last, what if it fails). Aim for 15 to 30. Pull from the panel objections and the competitor complaints first.
Step 3: solutions, trimmed and stacked
Turn each problem into a solution (a feature, a service, a guarantee, a format). Score each on value to the buyer (1 to 5) and cost to deliver (1 to 5, from the CFO's numbers). Keep high value, low cost. Stack what is left into:
- The core: the thing itself, described by the outcome, not the ingredients.
- Bonuses: two or three, each killing one specific objection.
- The guarantee: what happens if it does not deliver. Model what it costs at a realistic claim rate with the CFO's tool before promising it.
- Urgency and scarcity: only if they are true (a launch week, a limited first batch). Never fake a countdown or a "only 3 left".
- The name: a clear, specific name for the offer, not the company.
- The next sale (no dead ends, Ready, Fire, Aim, rule 11 in
rules.md): what a buyer of this offer is most likely to want next (a refill, an upgrade, a membership, the next service), and the easiest way to keep buying (a subscription they can cancel any time, a standing order). Put its expected value infounder/numbers.jsonasbackend_per_customer(PLANNEDuntil someone buys it), so/burn-testcan work out what a customer is worth.
Step 4: score it
On the value equation, before and after, 1 to 10 each: dream outcome, perceived likelihood of getting it, time to the result, effort and sacrifice. Say which element of the stack moves which score.
Say why the buyer buys: to feel good, or to solve a problem. For a problem, put the result in money or time saved ("each one saves you 30 minutes a week"), from a real or planned number with its label.
Be strict on likelihood: with no MEASURED results, a buyer has only the
founder's word. Likelihood is low until there is a case, a quote or a demo on
the buyer's kind of data, and a stack of bonuses does not change that.
Step 5: re-test it
Write the new offer into founder/pitch.md (keep the old one as
founder/pitch-v1.md) and run /truth-serum --quick with the same seed.
Report the buy rate before and after and which objections dropped. If nothing
moved, say so: the problem may be the market or the price, not the offer. If
it moved, say that too, and that it is still simulated: the real re-test is
the first-yes offer put to real buyers.
Log every promise the offer makes ("results in 5 days", "3x faster", "zero
data leaves the building") with ledger.py add as PLANNED, kind product,
unless it is already MEASURED with evidence.
Rules
- Every promise must be deliverable and affordable; check costs with the CFO.
- A promise that has not been measured is written as a goal or a commitment ("we will measure", "if we miss it, you pay nothing"), never as a fact.
- No fake reviews, testimonials, scarcity, discounts or "as seen on".
- Follow the advertising and consumer-protection rules of the user's market for guarantees and claims (health claims especially). Not legal advice.
Output
founder/offer.md (the hard truth first: the weakest part of the offer; then
the first-yes offer, the problem list, the stack, costs, the value-equation
scores, the re-test result) and the updated founder/pitch.md. Next:
/burn-test to re-run the numbers with the stack, then /signal,
or /handshake to send the first-yes offer to a real buyer.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

