agentleFS
peakdong68peakdong68/my-skills/skills/shadcn-code-review/SKILL.md

shadcn-code-review

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Reviews shadcn/ui components for CVA patterns, composition with asChild, accessibility states, and data-slot usage. Use when reviewing React components using shadcn/ui, Radix primitives, or Tailwind styling.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Not documenting copied shadcn components - library internals, not custom code

    line 39

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

shadcn/ui Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
className in CVA, missing VariantProps, compound variantsreferences/cva-patterns.md
asChild without Slot, missing Context, component compositionreferences/composition.md
Missing focus-visible, aria-invalid, disabled statesreferences/accessibility.md
Missing data-slot, incorrect CSS targetingreferences/data-slot.md

Review Checklist

  • cn() receives className, not CVA variants
  • VariantProps<typeof variants> exported for consumers
  • Compound variants used for complex state combinations
  • asChild pattern uses @radix-ui/react-slot
  • Context used for component composition (Card, Accordion, etc.)
  • focus-visible: states, not just :focus
  • aria-invalid, aria-disabled for form states
  • disabled: variants for all interactive elements
  • sr-only for screen reader text
  • data-slot attributes for targetable composition parts
  • CSS uses has() selectors for state-based styling
  • No direct className overrides of variant styles

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These are correct patterns that should NOT be flagged as issues:

  • max-h-(--var) - correct Tailwind v4 CSS variable syntax (NOT v3 bracket notation)
  • text-[color:var(--x)] - valid arbitrary value syntax
  • Copying shadcn component code into project - intended usage pattern
  • Not documenting copied shadcn components - library internals, not custom code
  • Using cn() with many arguments - composition is the pattern
  • Conditional classes in cn() arrays - valid Tailwind pattern
  • Extending primitive components without additional docs - well-known base

Context-Sensitive Rules

Apply these rules with appropriate context awareness:

  • Flag accessibility issues ONLY IF not handled by Radix primitives underneath
  • Flag missing aria labels ONLY IF component isn't using accessible radix primitive
  • Flag variant proliferation ONLY IF variants could be composed from existing
  • Flag component documentation ONLY IF it's custom code, not copied shadcn

Library Convention Note

shadcn/ui components are designed to be copied and modified. Code review should focus on:

  • Custom modifications made to copied components
  • Integration with application state/data
  • Accessibility in custom usage contexts

Do NOT flag:

  • Standard shadcn component internals
  • Radix primitive usage patterns
  • Default variant implementations

When to Load References

  • Reviewing variant definitions → cva-patterns.md
  • Reviewing component composition with asChild → composition.md
  • Reviewing form components or interactive elements → accessibility.md
  • Reviewing multi-part components (Card, Select, etc.) → data-slot.md

Review Questions

  1. Are CVA variants properly separated from className props?
  2. Does asChild composition work correctly with Slot?
  3. Are all accessibility states (focus, invalid, disabled) handled?
  4. Are data-slot attributes used for component part targeting?
  5. Can consumers extend variants without breaking composition?

Before Submitting Findings

Load and follow review-verification-protocol before reporting any issue.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.