linear-sprint-dashboard
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Pull current sprint state from Linear and produce a status dashboard with health indicators and blockers
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Read the current cycle (sprint) from Linear and produce a structured status dashboard suitable for a standup, sprint review, or async Slack …
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill when the user says:
- Distinctive: line 31
If multiple active cycles exist, ask the user which one to report on.
- Distinctive: line 33
If no active cycle: check for the most recently completed cycle and note that the sprint has ended.
- Distinctive: line 154
Ask the user which format they want, or default to the full dashboard if not specified.
- Distinctive: line 158
No cycle configured: If the team does not use cycles, offer to generate a dashboard based on label + status filter instead (e.g., "show all …
- Distinctive: line 162
Multiple teams: Run the dashboard for each team separately and produce a roll-up summary at the top.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Linear Sprint Dashboard
Read the current cycle (sprint) from Linear and produce a structured status dashboard suitable for a standup, sprint review, or async Slack update.
When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user says:
- "Give me the sprint status"
- "What's the current cycle looking like?"
- "Prepare the standup dashboard"
- "What's blocked / what's at risk in Linear?"
- "Sprint health check"
Prerequisites
- Linear MCP connected (
mcp__linear__*tools available) - Team ID or team name known (ask if not)
Step 1 — Find the active cycle
Use: mcp__linear__list_cycles
Parameters: { teamId: "<team_id>", filter: { isActive: true } }If multiple active cycles exist, ask the user which one to report on.
If no active cycle: check for the most recently completed cycle and note that the sprint has ended.
Step 2 — Pull all issues in the cycle
Use: mcp__linear__list_issues
Parameters: {
filter: {
cycle: { id: { eq: "<cycle_id>" } }
},
includeArchived: false
}For each issue, capture:
- ID, title, status, assignee, priority, labels
- Whether it has any blockers (blocked_by relations)
- Estimate (story points or time)
- Updated date (to detect stale issues)
Step 3 — Compute cycle health metrics
Calculate:
| Metric | Formula |
| Completion rate | Done issues / Total issues × 100% |
| In-progress | Count of issues in "In Progress" / "In Review" |
| Not started | Count of issues in "Todo" / "Backlog" |
| Blocked | Count of issues with blockers or "Blocked" status |
| Stale | Issues not updated in >3 working days |
| Unassigned | Issues with no assignee |
| Overdue | Issues past their due date (if due dates set) |
Health score:
- 🟢 Green: Completion rate on track for cycle end (>= expected % complete given days elapsed)
- 🟡 Yellow: 10-20pp behind expected pace, or 1+ blocked issues
- 🔴 Red: >20pp behind, or 2+ blocked issues, or unresolved blockers with no owner
Step 4 — Identify risks and highlights
Blockers: List all blocked issues with:
- Issue ID and title
- Who is blocked (assignee)
- What is blocking them (if captured in Linear)
- Days blocked
At-risk items: Issues that are In Progress but have not been updated in >2 working days.
Completed highlights: List up to 5 recently completed issues (most impactful first, based on priority label or estimate).
Step 5 — Generate dashboard output
Produce a structured report in this format:
Sprint Dashboard — [Team Name] — [Cycle Name]
Date: [Today] | Cycle end: [End date] | Days remaining: [N]
Health: 🟢 / 🟡 / 🔴 [status]
| Metric | Value |
| Total issues | N |
| ✅ Done | N (XX%) |
| 🔄 In Progress | N |
| 📋 Todo / Not started | N |
| 🚫 Blocked | N |
| ⚠️ Stale (>3 days) | N |
| 👤 Unassigned | N |
Expected completion at this point in cycle: XX% | Actual: XX%
🚫 Blockers
| Issue | Title | Assignee | Blocked Since | Blocker |
| [ID] | [Title] | [Name] | [N days] | [Description or "Unknown"] |
No blockers if none.
⚠️ At Risk
| Issue | Title | Assignee | Last Updated |
No at-risk items if none.
✅ Recently Completed (last 3 days)
- [ID] [Title] — [Assignee]
📋 Not Started (by priority)
List unstarted issues grouped by priority: Urgent → High → Medium → Low.
Recommendation
[1-3 sentences: what does the team need to focus on for the rest of the cycle? Any escalations needed?]
Formatting variants
Standup format (shorter): Skip the full "Not Started" list. Focus on Blockers + At Risk + Completed Yesterday.
Async Slack format: Produce a text-only version without markdown tables — use emoji + bullet points instead.
Weekly executive summary: Drop issue-level detail. Show only health status, completion %, blocker count, and recommendation.
Ask the user which format they want, or default to the full dashboard if not specified.
Common issues
No cycle configured: If the team does not use cycles, offer to generate a dashboard based on label + status filter instead (e.g., "show all In Progress issues in project X").
Large cycle (50+ issues): Summarize by assignee or label group — do not list all 50 issues.
Multiple teams: Run the dashboard for each team separately and produce a roll-up summary at the top.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

