mold
Skill19 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turn a high-leverage design decision into a validated spec through grounded dialogue. Use it when a leverage trigger fires (auth, irreversible effects, concurrency, contracts, destructive ops, a new slice, a cross-slice dependency, an invariant gap) or when the user asks for a spec or design. Typical phrases include "let's design X", "shape this into a spec", "what should the API for Z look like", and "/mold". A feature ask with zero fired triggers is a `/cook` mini-spec, not a mold; route it through `/cheese`. Do NOT use it for free-form discussion without artifact intent (`/culture`), direct implementation (`/cook`), or research-only questions (`/briesearch`). Ceremony scales to the ask through `references/tiers.md`, so a small clear change gets a validated mini-spec without a write-approval turn.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- huuphuoc1396/android-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- huuphuoc1396/android-claude-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- python-authoringSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- affinageSkill
- ageSkill
- briesearchSkill
- cheeseSkill
- cookSkill
- cultureSkill
- cureSkill
- easy-cheese-setupSkill
- hard-cheeseSkill
- meltSkill
- pasteurizeSkill
- plateSkill
- pressSkill
- ultracookSkill
- wheypointSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 27
Every non-goal and explicit dialogue deferral becomes a [FOLLOW-UP?] follow-up candidate.
- Very specific: line 52
Call source-code search, read, and edit backends according to code-intelligence-routing.md.
- Distinctive: line 73
Every Mold-produced spec carries a provenance marker in frontmatter:
- Very specific: line 114
Fork cards: Before each consequential question, show a fork card: what it decides, what it moves, and each branch as a symbol table or …
- Very specific: line 115
Altitude tag: Every Asking fork names the acceptance criterion, public seam, or non-goal it moves.
- Distinctive: line 118
Do not implement code.
- Distinctive: line 119
Do not write production files in Mold.
- Distinctive: line 120
Do not silently settle uncertain claims.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/mold
Ceremony scales to the job. The Bounds pass picks one of three tiers from references/tiers.md: Quick writes a validated mini-spec, Light runs only the dialogue modes the open forks need, and Full runs the whole Flow below. Saving a spec needs no extraction approval. Cook still needs an explicit user request. /cheese's tier-1 escalation enters mini-spec mode; see ## Agent-invoked mini-spec mode.
Flow
- Bounds pass — open the
Goal / Decided / Asking / [AGENT-DECIDED]ledger with the goal pinned as one sentence; only an explicit user fork changes it. Split it intoG-nclauses (references/handshake.md§ Goal coverage). Map every input's goals and non-goals as one[AGENT-DECIDED]line; ask the user only when the goal is genuinely unknown or a leverage trigger fires. Run the shape check, then announce the tier with its reason (references/tiers.md). Quick exits here to## Agent-invoked mini-spec modewithout a write-approval turn. Upgrade the tier whenever the evidence changes; never downgrade silently. - Route — choose the secondary mode from
references/modes.md, announce it, and correct false premises first. - Dialogue — consequential forks are the user's to pick. A fork is consequential per the leverage line in
../age/references/voice.md. Every other fork is[AGENT-DECIDED]. Supply options, trade-offs, and evidence before you ask. Ground each critical claim through code, the Validate Cycle, or a Prototype Cycle. Resolve every contradiction. Render the decision map after three consecutive fork questions, or on request. - Sketch — For work across modules or with a new public interface, run
references/shape-check.md. Bind identity and role nouns to code referents. Record the Placement block; no bodies. - Plan and validate — run the fresh-context fork-coherence taste test with
python3 skills/mold/scripts/mold.pyz taste-test; a failure reopens only named forks, and the third failed verdict stops. The taste review guides the spec but is not a Cook execution reference. For bound curd work, dispatch a typedPlannerRequest, validate itsPlannerResultWriterView(one retry, then save without runnable inputs), and normalize on the host. A clear single-curd task can instead use standalone Cook without a planner. Show semantic curds and waves before any Cook choice. Seereferences/curdle.md§ "Typed planner dispatch". - Readiness check — Before saving, run the coherence self-check and strict spec validation. Save a draft when unresolved parent work remains; record each hold in
execution_holds:. Finalization refuses ready while an entry remains. User approval is not a prerequisite for writing. Before Cook, require an explicit user selection of scope and route. Seereferences/handshake.mdandreferences/early-curds.md. - Curdle — Resolve the durable spec path with
python3 skills/mold/scripts/mold.pyz artifact-path specs <slug>and readpathfrom its JSON reply. Write the validated draft and read it back. Retain typed plan evidence and unresolved holds. Write local issue drafts and durable decisions; publish follow-ups only after their own approval. A concrete bounded curd may usereferences/early-curds.mdwhile Mold continues shaping its parent. The selected spec path can enter standalone Cook; bound curd execution also receives validated direct refs, never a pointer. - Offer Cook or keep shaping — after reconciliation, run
python3 skills/mold/scripts/mold.pyz curd-count. A saved draft is not an execution request. If the user selects bound curd execution, runscripts/mold.pyz finalizeand pass only ready direct inputs. A standalone clear task can enter Cook by spec path without machine finalization. Otherwise keep shaping or stop without a Cook command.
Portability: rules. Slash commands are host renderings, not the control model.
Follow-up candidates
Every non-goal and explicit dialogue deferral becomes a [FOLLOW-UP?] follow-up candidate. Dispose of the set before a runnable Cook handoff; details: references/handshake.md § Follow-up disposition.
Modes
| Mode | Use when | Goal |
| Explore | The idea is vague | Identify the real problem and pain point |
| Ground | A file, bug, or existing doc is named | Verify facts against evidence |
| Shape | The goal is known but approach is open | Compare viable options (Do Nothing always included) |
| Sketch | Interfaces or module boundaries matter | Lock responsibilities and seams |
| Grill | A favoured approach needs stress-testing | Steelman each item, then put every design-changing call to the user as a fork |
| Diagnose | A symptom, failure, or trace is supplied | Build a Loop → reproduce → hypothesize → confirm root cause |
Modes: references/modes.md. Evals: references/evals.md. Canvas: review-canvas.md.
Agent-invoked mini-spec mode
/cheese's tier-1 escalation calls /mold after the call site passes all Cook fast-path checks. The Quick tier enters the same mode without a write-approval turn. It produces a validated draft without design dialogue. Return the spec path. After the spec validates, show it and ask one direct Cook question. On explicit selection, dispatch /cook --spec <path> for clear standalone work; do not invent a pointer or require a planner. Append --hard when the user passed it.
The full coherence checklist does not run in this mode. The agent-introduced-scope check still runs implicitly. Every distinguishing noun must come from the user's input or tier-2 /culture//briesearch synthesis. Never add one silently.
Full procedure, the mini-spec schema, and the ## Provenance rules: references/mini-spec-mode.md.
Preferred tools and fallbacks
Call source-code search, read, and edit backends according to code-intelligence-routing.md. Shape checks use semantic caller search plus dependency context; procedure: references/shape-check.md.
Mold-specific tools beyond source-code routing:
| Need | Prefer | Fallback |
| External validation | /briesearch with Context7/Tavily | user docs, repo docs, or note as unverified |
Wiki grounding (Ground entry + decision points; scope per references/grounding.md § When to probe) | mcp__hallouminate__list_corpora + mcp__hallouminate__ground on repo:<repo>:wiki | record hallouminate: absent in the ledger, proceed on code evidence, and cap at speculating when design rationale is central |
The grounding record precedes the first structured question: the ledger holds a probe result — citations or hallouminate: absent — first. Mark each unsupported claim [?] until settled.
Sub-agent context gate
/mold owns the dialogue, contradictions, and save-approval state. Do not delegate these items. Delegate evidence-heavy code work to a fresh-context explorer and external research to a researcher. Shape uses an explorer digest as input. Record parent-context exploration as a degraded path. See references/context-budget.md for budgets and checkpoints.
Gate graph
python3 skills/mold/scripts/mold.pyz gate-graph --render dot|svg|png|mermaid renders one gate model. Image targets use Mermaid when Graphviz is unavailable. Tests keep gate nodes aligned with the handshake checklist. See references/gate-graph.md.
Spec provenance and Test Contracts
Every Mold-produced spec carries a provenance marker in frontmatter:
source: mold-handshake | agent-mini-spec | mold-curd-mini-specA spec has no disposition field. ## Test Contracts is optional: a spec may
include it, and no gate requires it. Row-level rules: references/curdle.md
§ Test Contracts.
Fork taste gate
python3 skills/mold/scripts/mold.pyz taste-test binds the verdict to draft SHA256 and each settled fork. Stale, partial, or blocked verdicts fail; a failure reopens only named forks, with two rounds. Approved specs pass unchanged metadata to /cook --spec <spec-path> (add --auto only when the user chose it) for standalone work; bound curd work uses /cook --auto --result <result-path>.
Each fork appears in Approach, Interface sketches, and Acceptance, plus Test Contracts when the draft has them. Do not rename sections. Tag reflecting lines with fork id and run taste-test --precheck before dispatch. goal must survive verbatim in Problem statement (goal-drift); each G-n clause carries an Acceptance or disposition tag (goal-coverage). See references/curdle.md § Spec template and references/gate-graph.md.
Execution gate
Mold may save a validated parent spec or early curd mini-spec without an approval turn. The agent coherence check still controls what the artifact claims as settled. Print the narrowing delta (taste-test --coverage) and the scope audit table before presenting any Cook option. Unresolved decisions remain visible holds, not implicit approvals. See references/handshake.md.
Never start Cook from a saved spec, silence, --auto, or a general design approval. The user must select the exact curd or parent scope and a Cook route. A changed scope or plan needs a new selection. A failed bound finalization leaves a saved draft without executable refs. See references/early-curds.md.
--hard
Mold never runs the metacognitive check. Plate alone runs it at the
verified-artifacts boundary. Mold appends --hard to every Cook command that
it emits when the user passed the flag. Cure forwards the same flag to Plate.
See ../hard-cheese/references/composition.md.
Handoff
Pipeline: culture → [mold] → cook (⇄ press) → age → cure → plate
After Curdle's phase two finishes, run python3 skills/mold/scripts/mold.pyz curd-count for the blast-radius digest. A draft offers no Cook command. On explicit Cook selection, retain the selected spec path for standalone work. Bound curd work dispatches the printed finalize command, /cook --auto --result <result-path>; the result carries request_id, spec_ref, planner_result_ref, plan_ref, and exact coverage. Prompt through the shared handoff gate (policy); never pre-select. Keep applicability, contract, and taste review metadata unchanged. Append --hard when the user passed it.
The digest's mode is orientation, not a skill or Cook gate. Render the fixed blast-radius menu from decomposable, candidate_curds, verdict, and mode; see references/handoff-menus.md.
Rules
- Dialogue first; artifacts are the by-product.
- Tiered lettered options. Consequential forks use
A/B/C/Dchoices via the question transport at../cheese/references/ask-user-question.md. Never decide them silently. Everything below the leverage line is[AGENT-DECIDED]by default: make the call, log a one-line vetoable alternative in the ledger, and do not ask. A fork is valid only after its depth was contributed in-dialogue first. Precede every structured question with visible prose that weighs the fork and the evidence. Keep one open picker in conversation. In the optional review canvas, independent, already-explained fork cards may share one batch; dependent forks wait for agent reconciliation. - Fork cards. Before each consequential question, show a fork card: what it decides, what it moves, and each branch as a symbol table or plain-text graph. Offer
Explain moreas a choice; an unclear reply re-renders the same fork with more context (fork-questions). - Altitude tag. Every
Askingfork names the acceptance criterion, public seam, or non-goal it moves. A fork that moves none, or that sits below the leverage line, is[AGENT-DECIDED]or a follow-up candidate, never a user question. - Decision ledger. Each round prints
Goal / Decided / Asking / [AGENT-DECIDED], the goal verbatim. Curdle persists consequential decisions to ADRs and minor ones to the spec. The taste verdict names every settled consequential entry exactly once. - Decision map and fork-round cap. Stop after three consecutive fork rounds that add no new evidence, or three consecutive forks that fail the altitude tag, or when the user requests a decision map. Show completed forks, remaining forks, and a ready or blocked verdict. A fourth round requires new grounding, a delegated digest, or a
/wheypointcheckpoint. The map shows ledger state. It does not create an artifact. - Do not implement code.
- Do not write production files in Mold. Saving a spec does not authorize Cook.
- Do not silently settle uncertain claims.
- Apply the shared voice kernel at
../age/references/voice.md. Correct false premises. Mark each critical claim's confidence ascertain | speculating | don't know. Steelman before you dismiss. Put consequential forks to the user; depth informs the question, never replaces it.
The generated ../cheese/references/schema-intertwine.md lists every published schema and its contract model.
Agent resolution
Resolve delegates through ../cheese/references/agent-resolution.md.
| Work | Preferred types | Permissions/isolation | Minimum power | Effort | Fallback |
| Explore the codebase | explorer | read-only, fresh-context | default | medium | compatible explorer, then general |
| Research external constraints | researcher | read-only, fresh-context | default | medium | compatible researcher, then general |
| Plan for approval | planner, general | read-only, fresh-context | powerful | high | compatible planner, then general |
The canonical mold spec or mini-spec carries the shared agent_resolution block.
Commands: references/commands.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

