age
Skill19 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Review a diff, PR, branch, or path across thirteen dimensions. Emit a severity-grouped findings report. Use when the user wants a code review. Trigger on "review this", "/age", "is this safe to merge", or "find bugs". Also trigger on "spot security issues", "check for slop", "review my PR", or "what's wrong with this code". Review every requested dimension. Review all thirteen dimensions by default. Do not apply fixes. Route them to /cure. Do not harden tests; route that work to /press.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- python-authoringSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- affinageSkill
- briesearchSkill
- cheeseSkill
- cookSkill
- cultureSkill
- cureSkill
- easy-cheese-setupSkill
- hard-cheeseSkill
- meltSkill
- moldSkill
- pasteurizeSkill
- plateSkill
- pressSkill
- ultracookSkill
- wheypointSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
64 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 59 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
59
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 25
Keep its record.revision_id as <base> (§ Base revision).
- Very specific: line 35
Every report needs a slug.
- Very specific: line 48
After phase entry, use .cheese/press/<slug>.md (if present) as Press context.
- Distinctive: line 53
If the base branch is unclear, ask or use the repository's documented default.
- Very specific: line 68
Write the markdown first. Then run python3 skills/age/scripts/age.pyz html-report --report .cheese/age/<slug>.md --slug <slug>.
- Very specific: line 74
Read ../cheese/references/harness-portability.md for helper resolution, sub-agent dispatch, GitHub operations, and handoff transitions.
- Very specific: line 75
Prefer the bundled or repo-local helper.
- Very specific: line 76
Treat ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} as an optional host-provided fallback.
- Very specific: line 82
Use --effort quick|normal|deep.
- Very specific: line 83
Use --overall for full subject fan-out across the review target.
- Very specific: line 90
Use references/dimensions.md for severity rules and recommendation shapes.
- Very specific: line 98
Read references/fan-out.md for the context checklist and deterministic planning contract.
- Distinctive: line 100
Use the assignments, effort, dispatch batches, and capability restrictions.
- Distinctive: line 101
Read scope interrogation before collecting evidence.
- Very specific: line 104
Use the resolved slug from ## Inputs.
- Very specific: line 110
Read the resolved file itself for the ## Review follow-ups section and every unresolved item.
- Very specific: line 112
Keep the artifact and baseline values from that preamble for step 5.
- Very specific: line 115
If no press report exists but a cook handoff exists, record press: skipped (see ## Output).
- Very specific: line 117
If no cook artifact exists either, omit the marker and continue.
- Very specific: line 118
If .cheese/glossary/<slug>.md exists, read it to flag naming drift as a deslop finding.
- Very specific: line 122
Do not filter findings by perceived significance.
- Very specific: line 124
Do not report a gate failure that matches the diff's recorded baseline: block.
- Very specific: line 125
Read ../cook/references/quality-gates.md for the baseline rules.
- Very specific: line 130
Follow references/fan-out.md for verification and the deep-only gap sweep before writing.
- Very specific: line 131
Write the report body to .cheese/age/<slug>-body.md.
- Very specific: line 132
Write the body only. Do not write the handoff preamble into that file.
- Very specific: line 133
Do not write .cheese/age/<slug>.md yourself.
- Very specific: line 142
Only a new packet for this slug permits recovery.
- Very specific: line 151
Call each source-code backend through the shared code-intelligence-routing.md contract.
- Very specific: line 155
Use ../cheese/references/formatting.md for cross-cutting house style and citation form.
- Very specific: line 163
Write the body below into .cheese/age/<slug>-body.md, with no preamble.
- Very specific: line 167
Use the voice-kernel scale for per-finding confidence: (see references/voice.md § Reasoning posture).
- Very specific: line 168
Use certain for direct evidence from a diff/code read or command output.
- Very specific: line 169
Use speculating for an inference from an indirect signal.
- Very specific: line 170
Do not ship a don't know grading as a finding row.
- Very specific: line 173
Add suppressed lows to the cure-selection table only when the user passes --full.
- Very specific: line 177
Follow the handback contract.
- Very specific: line 179
Keep every finding in the report, whatever next says.
- Very specific: line 181
When the plan or host restricts coverage, record the actual restriction in durable_flags and ## Confidence, not a size-only warning.
- Very specific: line 184
Check supplied dispatch observations with scripts/age.pyz review-plan-check before writing.
- Very specific: line 187
When press: skipped is set, print the following warning: Warning: no .cheese/press/<slug>.md.
- Very specific: line 189
When the user passes --html, print the HTML path that html-report returns.
- Very specific: line 196
Compute the recommended set: Use the all-medium, cheap composite.
- Very specific: line 216
Read references/handoff-detail.md § Auto mode before an --auto run.
- Very specific: line 223
Do not edit production files.
- Very specific: line 226
Do not raise a finding for a gate failure that matches the recorded baseline: block.
- Very specific: line 230
Ask first only for a genuine reason or when --safe is active.
- Distinctive: line 231
Treat an empty recommended set as a clean stop, not a question.
- Distinctive: line 232
Do not invent evidence. Cite files, diffs, commands, or unavailable-source notes.
- Very specific: line 235
Treat an empty dimension as a valid outcome, not a gap to fill.
- Very specific: line 236
Keep confidence qualitative (certain | speculating | don't know) in the report and each finding.
- Very specific: line 237
Never use a numeric score.
- Very specific: line 239
Write recommendation: and optional invariants: per references/report-example.md.
- Very specific: line 240
Do not add JSON sidecars or tag-anchored fix payloads.
- Very specific: line 246
Read the generated command inventory in references/commands.md.
- Very specific: line 247
Read references/dimensions.md before grading a finding.
- Very specific: line 248
Read references/fan-out.md before every review.
- Very specific: line 249
Read references/packet.md before assembling a fan-out context packet.
- Very specific: line 250
Read references/sub-agent-gate.md before a sub-agent dispatch.
- Very specific: line 251
Read references/handoff-detail.md before the selection gate or a /cure dispatch.
- Very specific: line 252
Read references/report-example.md § Body order before writing the report body.
- Very specific: line 253
Read references/packet.md § Evidence tools and fallbacks before gathering evidence.
- Very specific: line 255
Read references/voice.md before writing the report.
- Very specific: line 256
Read the applicable Rust, TypeScript, Python, Shell, or Go catalog before grading deslop.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/age
Review a diff or scoped path before merging or after /press. Use this skill whenever the user wants evidence-backed observations rather than an approval verdict.
Phase entry
Run python3 skills/age/scripts/age.pyz wheypoint-resolve --ref <slug>.
authoritative uses the record; its working_context is the first batched tilth_read.
not-found proceeds cold; legacy shows its source and slug, then proceeds.
gated, ambiguous, and error stop and show the payload.
Show advisory stale-commit and grounded-path-missing findings.
Keep its record.revision_id as <base> (§ Base revision).
Inputs
/age [<ref-or-range>] [--scope <path>]... [--slug <slug>] [--effort quick|normal|deep] [--overall] [--full] [--safe] [--open-pr] [--auto] [--hard] [--html]
/age <slug> [--effort quick|normal|deep] [--overall] [--full] [--safe] [--open-pr] [--auto] [--hard] [--html]Repeat --scope <path> for each reviewed path.
Every report needs a slug.
Take the slug from the <slug> form.
Take it from --slug <slug> on a scoped or range review.
Derive it with slugify only when the caller supplies neither.
A caller in a pipeline always passes the pipeline slug.
--full expands the ## Low section when ten or more low-severity findings exist.
The default report collapses that section to a one-line summary.
--safe re-introduces cure selection.
--open-pr propagates through /cure to terminal /plate.
A new PR follows /plate's explicit-choice and review-shape policy.
After phase entry, use .cheese/press/<slug>.md (if present) as Press context.
Review the current working diff.
For a <ref-or-range>, review that range.
Review the current working diff when the user supplies neither input.
If the base branch is unclear, ask or use the repository's documented default.
--auto is the propagated autonomous-mode flag from /cook --auto.
See ## Handoff and references/handoff-detail.md § Auto mode for the cap rule and the full chain.
handoff_context.wiki_hits is optional routed input from /cheese.
Each hit carries page, line, and why.
Reuse each valid hit before you ground the review again.
Render the reused hits in ## Wiki context.
--hard propagates through /cure to /plate.
Age never fires the gate.
/plate gives /hard-cheese the final verified artifact state before publication.
--html emits a static HTML copy alongside .cheese/age/<slug>.md.
Write the markdown first.
Then run python3 skills/age/scripts/age.pyz html-report --report .cheese/age/<slug>.md --slug <slug>.
Print the returned path.
The HTML groups findings by severity into the shared HTML shell.
The output is offline and uses no CDN or JS.
Read ../cheese/references/harness-portability.md for helper resolution, sub-agent dispatch, GitHub operations, and handoff transitions.
Prefer the bundled or repo-local helper.
Treat ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} as an optional host-provided fallback.
Slash commands are host renderings, not the control model.
The handoff blocks below define the portable contract.
Review effort and scope
Use --effort quick|normal|deep; the default is normal.
Use --overall for full subject fan-out across the review target.
--full still controls finding visibility, not review scope.
Review dimensions
Review correctness, security, encapsulation, spec, complexity, deslop, assertions, NIH, efficiency, telemetry, conventions, altitude, and reframe.
Assign one blocker, high, medium, or low severity to each finding.
Use references/dimensions.md for severity rules and recommendation shapes.
This workflow omits the git-history/precedent dimension.
Flow
Image: The /age review flow
- Identify the diff, scope, and relevant specification or issue.
Read
references/fan-out.mdfor the context checklist and deterministic planning contract. Collect instruction sources, build context, and runscripts/age.pyz age-routethrough its bundle path. Use the assignments, effort, dispatch batches, and capability restrictions. Read scope interrogation before collecting evidence. Ask the user only when missing intent changes a recommendation. The lock covers the packet, because the packet is review evidence. Then runpython3 skills/age/scripts/age.pyz review-lock --slug <slug>to lock the production tree. Use the resolved slug from## Inputs. Step 5 rejects the report when a production file changes. - Gather evidence from the diff, touched files, tests, and callers/imports.
Resolve the upstream report with
python3 skills/age/scripts/age.pyz artifact-path --phase press --slug <slug>. Validate its preamble withpython3 skills/age/scripts/age.pyz read-handoff-slug --phase press --slug <slug>. That command returns preamble fields only. Read the resolved file itself for the## Review follow-upssection and every unresolved item. Copy each unresolved item into a## Press findingssub-section. Keep theartifactandbaselinevalues from that preamble for step 5./curereads only.cheese/age/<slug>.md.
If no press report exists but a cook handoff exists, record press: skipped (see ## Output).
Print the warning at handoff.
If no cook artifact exists either, omit the marker and continue.
If .cheese/glossary/<slug>.md exists, read it to flag naming drift as a deslop finding.
3. Review every dimension.
Omit dimensions with no findings.
Report every defect, however minor.
Do not filter findings by perceived significance.
Verification filters findings after reconciliation.
Do not report a gate failure that matches the diff's recorded baseline: block.
Read ../cook/references/quality-gates.md for the baseline rules.
Report only new or changed failures.
4. Compute severity per finding (base + location bump + compounding bump, capped at blocker).
Group findings by severity (## Blocker → ## High → ## Medium → ## Low).
Order findings by file within each severity group.
Follow references/fan-out.md for verification and the deep-only gap sweep before writing.
5. Write the report body to .cheese/age/<slug>-body.md.
Write the body only. Do not write the handoff preamble into that file.
Do not write .cheese/age/<slug>.md yourself. The gated writer creates it.
Compute the recommended set first (see ## Handoff).
Set <next> to cure when that set is not empty.
Set <next> to done when that set is empty.
Set <artifact> to the upstream report path from step 2. Use "" only when no upstream report exists.
Set <baseline> to the baseline block from that upstream handoff. Omit --baseline only when the upstream handoff has none.
Run python3 skills/age/scripts/age.pyz write-handoff-artifact --phase age [--base <base>] --slug <slug> --status ok --next <next> --artifact "<artifact>" --orientation "<one-line orientation>" --durable-flags "<none | one line per flag>" --baseline "<baseline>" --grounded <path[#start-end]> --body-file ".cheese/age/<slug>-body.md".
Print the path.
Only a new packet for this slug permits recovery; follow references/packet.md § Late evidence.
Other changes require a fresh review.
6. Hand off (see ## Handoff below).
Sub-agent fan-out
/age plans independent review subjects with the contextual age router (src/easy_cheese/shared/fanout/age_route.py).
See references/fan-out.md, references/packet.md, and references/sub-agent-gate.md for mechanics.
Call each source-code backend through the shared code-intelligence-routing.md contract.
Output
Use ../cheese/references/formatting.md for cross-cutting house style and citation form.
This section defines the findings-report shape.
formatting.md defines the voice rules and footnote primitive.
The gated writer writes .cheese/age/<slug>.md.
It puts the minimum handoff slug at the top.
The slug carries status, next, artifact, durable_flags, baseline, and one-line orientation.
Supply each value through the step 5 command.
Write the body below into .cheese/age/<slug>-body.md, with no preamble.
references/report-example.md § Body order defines the section order, the exact
finding format, and the full skeleton. Read it before you write the body.
Use the voice-kernel scale for per-finding confidence: (see references/voice.md § Reasoning posture).
Use certain for direct evidence from a diff/code read or command output.
Use speculating for an inference from an indirect signal.
Do not ship a don't know grading as a finding row.
Gather the missing evidence or drop the claim.
Reserve don't know for the report-level ## Confidence line.
Add suppressed lows to the cure-selection table only when the user passes --full.
Set status: ok when the review completes.
Set status: halt: <reason> when the review cannot reach evidence.
Follow the handback contract.
Derive next from the recommended set that ## Handoff computes.
Keep every finding in the report, whatever next says.
Set durable_flags: to none by default, as in cook's gate.
When the plan or host restricts coverage, record the actual restriction in durable_flags and ## Confidence, not a size-only warning.
Record the resolved worker types under ## Agent resolution in the body.
Record dispatch metadata for every topology. Use the fields in report-example.md.
Check supplied dispatch observations with scripts/age.pyz review-plan-check before writing; absent observations remain explicitly unobserved.
Print Age report: .cheese/age/<slug>.md.
When press: skipped is set, print the following warning:
Warning: no .cheese/press/<slug>.md. Re-run /cook or /press <slug>, or continue with /cure.
When the user passes --html, print the HTML path that html-report returns.
The render command appears under --html in ## Inputs.
Handoff
Pipeline: culture → mold → cook (⇄ press) → [age] → cure → plate
Compute the recommended set. Use the all-medium, cheap composite.
Include the medium floor (blocker+high+medium).
Also include every Low with fix-cost-now: contained.
Decide whether to act or ask.
This selection is the only one. ## Output derives next from it.
A review with contained lows and no medium finding has a non-empty set.
That review sets next: cure and keeps every low finding in the report.
- Empty set — Set
next: done. Print the report path. Stop. - Reason to ask — Ask when a set member has
fix-cost-now: sprawlingorfix-cost-later: structural. Also ask when two findings conflict. Also ask when the user passes--safe. Readreferences/handoff-detail.mdfirst. Render the gate per../cheese/references/handoff-gate.md. Pre-select the composite. Mark each heavy row. - Otherwise — Act. Announce the selection. Dispatch
/cureperreferences/handoff-detail.md§ Dispatch. Do not render a gate.
--auto substitutes a severity-floor selection and its own chain.
Read references/handoff-detail.md § Auto mode before an --auto run.
That file also defines the no-chain override under /cook's fan pathway.
Rules
Review is not a verdict.
Explain where to look and why.
Do not edit production files.
The step 1 review lock enforces this rule.
/cure applies each fix.
Do not raise a finding for a gate failure that matches the recorded baseline: block.
Default to acting.
Auto-select the recommended set.
Dispatch /cure without a gate.
Ask first only for a genuine reason or when --safe is active.
Treat an empty recommended set as a clean stop, not a question.
Do not invent evidence.
Cite files, diffs, commands, or unavailable-source notes.
Agree when the diff is fine.
Treat an empty dimension as a valid outcome, not a gap to fill.
Keep confidence qualitative (certain | speculating | don't know) in the report and each finding.
Never use a numeric score.
Give each finding a location and recommendation.
Write recommendation: and optional invariants: per references/report-example.md.
Do not add JSON sidecars or tag-anchored fix payloads.
/cure reads the markdown directly.
Apply references/voice.md (output discipline, reasoning posture, confidence vocabulary).
References
- Read the generated command inventory in
references/commands.md. - Read
references/dimensions.mdbefore grading a finding. - Read
references/fan-out.mdbefore every review. - Read
references/packet.mdbefore assembling a fan-out context packet. - Read
references/sub-agent-gate.mdbefore a sub-agent dispatch. - Read
references/handoff-detail.mdbefore the selection gate or a/curedispatch. - Read
references/report-example.md§ Body order before writing the report body. - Read
references/packet.md§ Evidence tools and fallbacks before gathering evidence. - Read
references/handoff-detail.md§ Auto mode before an--autorun. - Read
references/voice.mdbefore writing the report. - Read the applicable Rust, TypeScript, Python, Shell, or Go catalog before grading
deslop.
Agent resolution
Resolve every subject worker and fresh-context review through ../cheese/references/agent-resolution.md.
| Work | Preferred types | Permissions/isolation | Minimum power | Effort | Fallback |
| Review a diff or assigned subjects | reviewer | read-only, fresh-context | powerful | high | compatible reviewer, then general |
The router sets each assignment's effort to low, medium, or high.
Pass that assignment value to its worker, not the plan's quick, normal, or deep review mode.
The report body carries the shared agent_resolution block under ## Agent resolution.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

