noslop
Skill0 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub
Domain router for the no-slop filter on backend handlers, APIs, frontend UI, database access, infra/config, tests, and code comments. Stops tutorial layering, generic errors, OpenAPI filler, a11y/perf theater, N+1 queries, and AI comment noise. Pairs with code-review (noslop dimension) and polyglot-copywriter for review/MR prose. Use when generating or auditing code that must fit this repo—not a paste. Subskill noslop-code is comments-only. Default mode: during; after mode for audits.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- owayo/nosloptheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- owayo/noslop★ 13same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .cursor/rules/comments.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/commit-messages.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/git-workflow.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/manage-stack.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/no-worktrees.mdcCursor rule
- manage-stackSkill
- convert-as-skillSkill
- create-agentSkill
- create-agents-mdSkill
- create-commandSkill
- create-hookSkill
- create-ruleSkill
- create-skillSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- super-architectureSkill
- super-cachingSkill
- super-elixirSkill
- super-nodejsSkill
- super-protobufSkill
- super-tech-blueprintSkill
- atomic-semantic-commitSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- create-bruno-collectionSkill
- create-documentationSkill
- create-ticketsSkill
- ready-specSkill
- write-adrSkill
- write-changelogSkill
- write-mr-descriptionSkill
- write-planSkill
- write-postmortemSkill
- write-runbookSkill
- output-saversSkill
- safe-refactorSkill
- tddSkill
- verifySkill
- get-movingSkill
- later-listSkill
- standupSkill
- challenge-meSkill
- codebase-learnerSkill
- researchSkill
- second-opinionSkill
- traceSkill
- color-kitSkill
- design-system-kitSkill
- diagramSkill
- infographicSkill
- product-polish-workflowSkill
- prototype-wireframeSkill
- ui-ux-kitSkill
- evidenceSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- handoffSkill
- rumblingSkill
- use-levistackSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 31
Ask the user (in their chat language) when noslop applies: during the work or after.
- Distinctive: line 37
Do this first; load only what the task needs.
- Distinctive: line 73
Every layer, type, and error shape must pass the purpose test (R-31).
- Distinctive: line 77
Before adding a file, layer, or dependency: what does this serve?
- Distinctive: line 81
Done: when: rules pass; edge paths are real.
- Very specific: line 115
Run delivery-gate.md every pass on executable surfaces.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Noslop
No Slop: tight, intentional code and messages for AI-assisted work
Apply when generating or editing executable code, API/CLI copy, OpenAPI, config, migrations, or comments. Code must fit this repo's boundaries and vocabulary, not a tutorial paste.
Ask the user (in their chat language) when noslop applies: during the work or after. Auto mode: during.
Rule: noslop.md. Gate order: workflow-gates.md.
Step 0: detect the domain
Do this first; load only what the task needs. Index: references/domains/README.md.
| If the diff or task touches… | Domain | Load |
| Handlers, services, workers, jobs, domain logic | backend | backend.md + core pack below |
| HTTP routes, status codes, envelopes, OpenAPI, webhooks | api | api.md + core pack |
| SQL, ORM, migrations, indexes, transactions | database | database.md + core pack |
| Components, CSS, layout, client state, a11y | frontend | frontend.md + core pack |
| Env, feature flags, IaC snippets, deploy config in diff | infra-config | infra-config.md + core pack |
| Test files, fixtures, mocks, assertions | tests | tests.md + core pack |
| README/CHANGELOG-only or pure docs with no code surface | docs | docs-exclusions.md — prose skills instead |
| Code comments only (no logic edits) | comments | Core delivery gate + noslop-code |
Core pack (all executable domains): slop-patterns.md + mandatory-rules.md + delivery-gate.md. User-facing CLI/API copy: add principles-and-cli-copy.md.
Package layout
noslop/
├── SKILL.md # router (this file)
├── references/
│ ├── core/ # R-01–R-38, gates, patterns, workflow
│ └── domains/ # per-layer checklists
├── templates/ # architecture read, audit, AGENTS pointer
└── skills/
└── noslop-code/ # comment hygiene; never touches executable codeWhat this is (and is not)
Filter, not a framework mandate.
- Does not require DDD, microservices, or Clean Architecture unless the repo already uses them.
- Does not ban interfaces, middleware, or retries — rejects patterns without purpose.
- Does not replace polyglot-copywriter for human-facing prose (MR bodies, essays).
Every layer, type, and error shape must pass the purpose test (R-31). Details: mandatory-rules.md.
Core principle
Before adding a file, layer, or dependency: what does this serve? If the answer is "every tutorial does this" or "it's best practice", rework.
Swap-company test: if the product name changed, would this module still belong in this codebase?
Done when: rules pass; edge paths are real; R-35 verify evidence exists in the current turn (a command run this turn, not memory).
Craftsmanship standard
| Id | Standard |
| C-1 | Intentionality — "AI default" is a red flag |
| C-2 | Functional completeness — real work or honest errors, no fake success |
| C-3 | Content-driven structure — modules exist for this product's flow |
| C-4 | Resilience — empty, validation, timeout, rate limit, upstream failure |
| C-5 | Evidence over claims — metrics and compliance real or omitted |
Principles (KISS/YAGNI/deletion test): principles-and-cli-copy.md.
Two usage modes
When do you want to use noslop?
- DURING — apply mandatory-rules.md while coding; finish with delivery-gate.md.
- AFTER — write audit using templates/audit-after-mode.md; user picks finding numbers to fix.
Templates
| Task | Load |
| Architecture read (before backend code) | templates/architecture-read.md |
| After-mode audit file | templates/audit-after-mode.md |
| First-run AGENTS.md pointer | templates/agents-md-pointer.md |
Before coding (backend-heavy work)
Fill templates/architecture-read.md — required at delivery for handler/API/database changes.
Delivery gate
Run delivery-gate.md every pass on executable surfaces. Comments only: delivery gate + noslop-code checklist.
When invoked by code-review
- Scope: MR review comment bodies and user-facing API/error copy flagged in the diff — not executable code inside suggestion fences.
- Mode: after — audit draft comment text before posting GitLab draft notes.
- Inline vs summary: reject generic rollup blocks; each finding stays on its inline draft. See
code-review. - Dimensions: cite rule IDs (R-XX) in findings; Dim column stays
noslop. Full MR signals: review-dimensions.md §8. - Pair with polyglot-copywriter (
code-reviewuse case) for STE-simple phrasing after slop removal.
When invoked by write-mr-description
- Scope: MR description markdown — not commit subjects or code paths.
- Mode: after render from TEMPLATE.md; strip AI filler and unjustified breaking claims before opening the draft MR.
Old skill name
| Old | Use |
noslop | This skill (noslop) |
noslop-code | noslop-code |
Related skills
noslop-code: the task edits comments only.code-review: review a diff with the noslop dimension.write-mr-description: the filtered change is ready for an MR.safe-refactor: the slop needs a structural fix, not a delete.polyglot-copywriter: rewrite prose in comments or docs.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

