adversarial-audit
Skill2 starsChanged 40 days agoMITView on GitHub
Adversarial verification of claimed work: read shipped modules (not memory), grep wiring and approvals, run tests, demand evidence before pass verdict. Use when reviewing agent output, PRs, or security-sensitive changes before merge. Triggers: adversarial audit, refute claims, evidence before verdict, pre-merge review.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- phatnguyen03022001/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 24, 2026
- jeremyinthebay/relay-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 13, 2026
- kunalsuri/ai-fication-kittheir own version, first seen Jul 11, 2026
- neonwatty/qa-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 8, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- neonwatty/qa-skills★ 34same name
- kunalsuri/ai-fication-kit★ 3same name
- phatnguyen03022001/agent-skills★ 2same name
- jeremyinthebay/relay-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository49 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agentic-reactorSkill
- agent-orchestratorSkill
- ai-optimizationSkill
- architecture-synthesisSkill
- audit-allow-buildsSkill
- audit-ide-dependenciesSkill
- author-workflow-skillSkill
- bdd-strategizerSkill
- chrome-extension-mv3Skill
- concurrent-cli-agentsSkill
- control-feederSkill
- control-graphSkill
- cursor-transcript-harvestSkill
- cv-promote-guardSkill
- devcontainer-hardenedSkill
- dual-copy-skill-publishSkill
- explore-repo-readonlySkill
- finder-reactorSkill
- fix-dependency-securitySkill
- fusion-sageSkill
- git-worktreesSkill
- grok-host-prepSkill
- gt-flowSkill
- higher-order-decision-architectSkill
- looperSkill
- master-plannerSkill
- mvu-refactor-planSkill
- odysseus-navigatorSkill
- project-editor-profileSkill
- react-client-expertSkill
- semantic-markup-cssSkill
- semantic-nameSkill
- session-unit-orderSkill
- shell-kernel-ontologySkill
- skill-rename-propagationSkill
- split-to-prsSkill
- src-tree-reorganizeSkill
- stellar-roadmapSkill
- stellar-spacemapSkill
- subagent-delegationSkill
- subagent-explore-reportSkill
- supply-chain-hardenSkill
- tauri-agenticSkill
- tauri-ipc-debugSkill
- tidy-commit-pushSkill
- upgrade-packagesSkill
- verification-cockpitSkill
- x-agent-resourcesSkill
The file
Files
adversarial-audit
Load rule: Formal SoT. Distinct from re-running verify cmds alone (agent-orchestrator VERIFY) and from Outer REVIEW_GATE shape (control-graph) — this skill is refute-first evidence pack with independent reads.
CLT: ../rules/clt-dual-load.mdc — review is protected germane load; never collapse to implementer self-summary.
// Role
Reviewer ⊥ ImplementerContext // fresh session/context; try to refute claims
// Axioms
A1 Default real=false until independent evidence
A2 Read shipped files + run commands — never trust summary alone
A3 Verdict requires: scope check + tests/cmds + explicit gaps
A4 Compose: Orch owns re-run of verify cmds; CG owns when REVIEW_GATE fires; this skill owns attack surface + evidence artifact
A5 Fail closed on missing evidence for security/auth/deps claims
A6 Evaluate(δ) ≔ (C, E, η)Related: agent-orchestrator · control-graph · fix-dependency-security.
Use / skip
| Use | Skip |
| worker/agent claimed "done" | pure design chat, no diff |
| pre-merge high stakes | typo you wrote yourself 30s ago (still run lint if easy) |
| security / auth / deps changes | |
| refute marketing claims in PR body |
vs Orch VERIFY: Orch re-runs listed cmds and checks scope. This skill also opens files, greps wiring, hunts missing authz/tests, and writes a verdict artifact.
vs CG REVIEW_GATE: CG is phase/budget control. This skill is the review content procedure for the review Role.
Procedure
1 Scope inventory → 2 Read shipped code → 3 Run verify cmds → 4 Attack claims → 5 Verdict artifact1. Scope inventory
git diff <base>...HEAD --stat
git log <base>..HEAD --onelineList claimed outcomes from brief/PR body.
2. Read shipped code
Open every file that implements a claim; grep wiring:
rg -n "pattern|approval|TODO|FIXME|XXX" --glob '!**/node_modules/**'3. Run verify commands
From brief / AGENTS.md / CI — capture exit codes:
# examples — use project actuals
pnpm type-check && pnpm lint
cargo test -q4. Attack claims
- Does diff match the claim?
- Missing error paths, authz, cleanup?
- Tests that don't exercise the change?
- Secrets or overly broad permissions?
5. Verdict artifact
## Adversarial verdict
**Claims reviewed:** …
**Evidence:** files read · cmds + exit
**Confirmed:** …
**Refuted / gaps:** …
**Risk:** low|med|high
**Decision:** pass | fix-required | blockedDone when
- Independent reads + at least one automated check (or documented why impossible)
- Explicit pass/fail with gaps list
- No merge recommendation on testimony alone
Anti-patterns
| ¬ | Do |
| "LGTM" from PR text | open the files |
| same context that implemented | new review role / session |
| ignore failing tests | fail closed |
| duplicate full control-graph Outer | link CG; stay on evidence pack |
Done_when cmds: git diff <base>...HEAD --stat · project verify cmds · verdict markdown present.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

