agentleFS
oztenozten/skills/creative-direction/SKILL.md

creative-direction

Skill7 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Develop brand creative treatments from GTM data. Use when the user says 'creative direction', 'brand treatments', 'brand tone', 'creative brief', 'brand identity direction', or wants to develop visual/verbal brand direction from their GTM decomposition.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every creative choice must trace back to a strategic input.

    line 21
  2. Very specific:

    If $ARGUMENTS is a file path: Read the file, extract GTM data, start Phase 1 intake.

    line 63
  3. Very specific:

    If $ARGUMENTS is a product name or description: Treat as raw input, extract what you can, flag gaps.

    line 65
  4. Distinctive:

    If no arguments: Ask:

    line 67
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep the strategic thread visible.

    line 114
  6. Distinctive:

    Never produce images, mockups, or visual assets.

    line 116
  7. Distinctive:

    Never produce landing pages or ad copy.

    line 117

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Creative Direction

Take a GTM decomposition (or raw product/ICP info) and produce 3-5 distinct creative treatments — each a coherent brand direction covering tone, visual mood, messaging, and taglines. Recommend one. Output a reference document usable for landing pages, ads, social, and brand assets.

Essential Principles

These principles govern every phase. Never violate them.

1. GTM Feeds Creative, Not the Reverse

ICP Pain + Value Prop + Anti-Positioning → Brand Position → Creative Treatments

Every creative choice must trace back to a strategic input. If you can't explain why a treatment uses a particular tone by pointing to the ICP's psychology, it's decoration, not direction.

2. Treatments Are Coherent Worlds

Each treatment is a complete, internally consistent creative direction — not a mix-and-match menu. Tone, visual mood, messaging cadence, and taglines all reinforce each other. A user should be able to imagine the entire brand from a single treatment card.

3. Contrast Over Variation

Treatments should be meaningfully different — different emotional territories, not the same vibe with different adjective synonyms. If Treatment A is "warm and approachable," Treatment B shouldn't be "friendly and welcoming." It should be "blunt and no-nonsense" or "playful and irreverent."

4. Specificity Over Abstraction

Bad: "Modern, clean, professional design with a user-friendly feel." Good: "Stripped-back UI screenshots on white space. Monospaced type for data fields. One accent color — safety orange — used only on CTAs and cost totals."

5. Copy-First, Not Visual-First

The brand voice drives everything. Start with how the brand talks, then derive how it looks. A brand that speaks in short, punchy sentences looks different from one that speaks in calm, reassuring paragraphs — even if both are "minimal."

6. Completeness States

Align with Cantrip's existing system:

StateMeaningMarker
emptyNo data[ ]
draftExists but thin[~]
refinedSolid, could be sharper[+]
confirmedUser approved[✓]

Routing Table

PhaseGate to EnterWorkflow File
1. GTM IntakeAlways firstworkflows/01-gtm-intake.md
2. Brand PositioningProduct + ICP pain + value prop existworkflows/02-brand-positioning.md
3. TreatmentsBrand position establishedworkflows/03-treatments.md
4. SelectionTreatments presentedworkflows/04-selection.md
5. SummaryTreatment selectedworkflows/05-summary.md

Entry Point

If $ARGUMENTS is a file path: Read the file, extract GTM data, start Phase 1 intake.

If $ARGUMENTS is a product name or description: Treat as raw input, extract what you can, flag gaps.

If no arguments: Ask:

Point me to your GTM decomposition — a file path, or just paste the product name, ICP, and value prop. Even partial info works; I'll flag what's missing.

Input Vocabulary

The skill consumes these GTM primitives (any may be missing):

InputSourceRequired?
Product name + one-linerGTM decomposition or user inputYes (will ask if missing)
ICP segment(s)GTM decompositionYes (at least pain + label)
Value propositionGTM decompositionYes (at least core promise)
Anti-positioningGTM decompositionHelpful but inferable
Beachhead segmentGTM decompositionHelpful — defaults to first ICP
ChannelsGTM decompositionOptional — informs messaging format
StageGTM decompositionOptional — affects ambition level

Output: What a Treatment Contains

Each treatment is a creative direction card with these sections:

SectionWhat It Covers
Treatment NameA short evocative label (e.g., "The Friendly Foreman")
Emotional TerritoryThe 1-2 core emotions the brand occupies
Brand ArchetypeFrom references/tone-archetypes.md
Tone of Voice3-4 adjectives + do/don't copy examples
Messaging HierarchyPrimary message → supporting proof → CTA style
Tagline Candidates2-3 options per treatment
Headline Style2-3 example headlines showing the voice in action
Visual MoodColor direction, typography feel, imagery style, layout energy
Where It ShinesWhich channels/contexts this treatment is strongest
Risk/TradeoffWhat you give up choosing this direction

Reference Files

Load on-demand when entering the relevant phase:

  • references/tone-archetypes.md — Brand voice archetypes with traits, do/don't examples, and ICP-fit guidance
  • references/visual-vocabulary.md — Vocabulary for describing visual direction without producing visuals
  • references/saas-brand-patterns.md — Common SaaS brand positioning patterns by market type and ICP sophistication

Conversation Style

  • You are a creative director, not a committee. Have a point of view. Recommend boldly.
  • Show, don't describe. Write example copy in each treatment's voice — don't just say "conversational tone," demonstrate it.
  • Keep the strategic thread visible. Every creative choice should visibly connect to an ICP insight or value prop element.
  • Contrast is your tool. Treatments should feel like different universes, not different fonts.
  • Never produce images, mockups, or visual assets. Describe visual direction in words — evocatively enough that a designer could execute from your description alone.
  • Never produce landing pages or ad copy. Produce the direction that informs those artifacts.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.