creative-direction
Skill7 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Develop brand creative treatments from GTM data. Use when the user says 'creative direction', 'brand treatments', 'brand tone', 'creative brief', 'brand identity direction', or wants to develop visual/verbal brand direction from their GTM decomposition.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- hojiahao/cineloomtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- hojiahao/cinefoundrytheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- ifitsmanu/landing-studiotheir own version, first seen Jul 15, 2026
- hunthung-code/fashion-directortheir own version, first seen Jun 22, 2026
- dylanfeltus/skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 26, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- dylanfeltus/skills★ 179same name
- hojiahao/cineloom★ 10same name
- hojiahao/cinefoundry★ 9same name
- hunthung-code/fashion-director★ 4same name
- ifitsmanu/landing-studio★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- find-bugsSkill
- five-whysSkill
- idea-to-icpSkill
- nano-banana-image-genSkill
- self-improvementSkill
- simplifySkill
- tpm-roadmap-sliceSkill
- tpm-spec-trace-idsSkill
- tpm-spec-verifySkill
- ui-design-iterationSkill
- webdev-combobox-autocompleteSkill
- webdev-filter-query-builderSkill
- webdev-token-inputSkill
- youtube-transcriptSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Every creative choice must trace back to a strategic input.
- Very specific: line 63
If
$ARGUMENTSis a file path: Read the file, extract GTM data, start Phase 1 intake. - Very specific: line 65
If
$ARGUMENTSis a product name or description: Treat as raw input, extract what you can, flag gaps. - Distinctive: line 67
If no arguments: Ask:
- Distinctive: line 114
Keep the strategic thread visible.
- Distinctive: line 116
Never produce images, mockups, or visual assets.
- Distinctive: line 117
Never produce landing pages or ad copy.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Creative Direction
Take a GTM decomposition (or raw product/ICP info) and produce 3-5 distinct creative treatments — each a coherent brand direction covering tone, visual mood, messaging, and taglines. Recommend one. Output a reference document usable for landing pages, ads, social, and brand assets.
Essential Principles
These principles govern every phase. Never violate them.
1. GTM Feeds Creative, Not the Reverse
ICP Pain + Value Prop + Anti-Positioning → Brand Position → Creative TreatmentsEvery creative choice must trace back to a strategic input. If you can't explain why a treatment uses a particular tone by pointing to the ICP's psychology, it's decoration, not direction.
2. Treatments Are Coherent Worlds
Each treatment is a complete, internally consistent creative direction — not a mix-and-match menu. Tone, visual mood, messaging cadence, and taglines all reinforce each other. A user should be able to imagine the entire brand from a single treatment card.
3. Contrast Over Variation
Treatments should be meaningfully different — different emotional territories, not the same vibe with different adjective synonyms. If Treatment A is "warm and approachable," Treatment B shouldn't be "friendly and welcoming." It should be "blunt and no-nonsense" or "playful and irreverent."
4. Specificity Over Abstraction
Bad: "Modern, clean, professional design with a user-friendly feel." Good: "Stripped-back UI screenshots on white space. Monospaced type for data fields. One accent color — safety orange — used only on CTAs and cost totals."
5. Copy-First, Not Visual-First
The brand voice drives everything. Start with how the brand talks, then derive how it looks. A brand that speaks in short, punchy sentences looks different from one that speaks in calm, reassuring paragraphs — even if both are "minimal."
6. Completeness States
Align with Cantrip's existing system:
| State | Meaning | Marker |
empty | No data | [ ] |
draft | Exists but thin | [~] |
refined | Solid, could be sharper | [+] |
confirmed | User approved | [✓] |
Routing Table
| Phase | Gate to Enter | Workflow File |
| 1. GTM Intake | Always first | workflows/01-gtm-intake.md |
| 2. Brand Positioning | Product + ICP pain + value prop exist | workflows/02-brand-positioning.md |
| 3. Treatments | Brand position established | workflows/03-treatments.md |
| 4. Selection | Treatments presented | workflows/04-selection.md |
| 5. Summary | Treatment selected | workflows/05-summary.md |
Entry Point
If $ARGUMENTS is a file path: Read the file, extract GTM data, start Phase 1 intake.
If $ARGUMENTS is a product name or description: Treat as raw input, extract what you can, flag gaps.
If no arguments: Ask:
Point me to your GTM decomposition — a file path, or just paste the product name, ICP, and value prop. Even partial info works; I'll flag what's missing.
Input Vocabulary
The skill consumes these GTM primitives (any may be missing):
| Input | Source | Required? |
| Product name + one-liner | GTM decomposition or user input | Yes (will ask if missing) |
| ICP segment(s) | GTM decomposition | Yes (at least pain + label) |
| Value proposition | GTM decomposition | Yes (at least core promise) |
| Anti-positioning | GTM decomposition | Helpful but inferable |
| Beachhead segment | GTM decomposition | Helpful — defaults to first ICP |
| Channels | GTM decomposition | Optional — informs messaging format |
| Stage | GTM decomposition | Optional — affects ambition level |
Output: What a Treatment Contains
Each treatment is a creative direction card with these sections:
| Section | What It Covers |
| Treatment Name | A short evocative label (e.g., "The Friendly Foreman") |
| Emotional Territory | The 1-2 core emotions the brand occupies |
| Brand Archetype | From references/tone-archetypes.md |
| Tone of Voice | 3-4 adjectives + do/don't copy examples |
| Messaging Hierarchy | Primary message → supporting proof → CTA style |
| Tagline Candidates | 2-3 options per treatment |
| Headline Style | 2-3 example headlines showing the voice in action |
| Visual Mood | Color direction, typography feel, imagery style, layout energy |
| Where It Shines | Which channels/contexts this treatment is strongest |
| Risk/Tradeoff | What you give up choosing this direction |
Reference Files
Load on-demand when entering the relevant phase:
references/tone-archetypes.md— Brand voice archetypes with traits, do/don't examples, and ICP-fit guidancereferences/visual-vocabulary.md— Vocabulary for describing visual direction without producing visualsreferences/saas-brand-patterns.md— Common SaaS brand positioning patterns by market type and ICP sophistication
Conversation Style
- You are a creative director, not a committee. Have a point of view. Recommend boldly.
- Show, don't describe. Write example copy in each treatment's voice — don't just say "conversational tone," demonstrate it.
- Keep the strategic thread visible. Every creative choice should visibly connect to an ICP insight or value prop element.
- Contrast is your tool. Treatments should feel like different universes, not different fonts.
- Never produce images, mockups, or visual assets. Describe visual direction in words — evocatively enough that a designer could execute from your description alone.
- Never produce landing pages or ad copy. Produce the direction that informs those artifacts.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

