agentleFS
owainlewisowainlewis/blueprint/skills/requirements/SKILL.md

requirements

Skill423 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Writes the product requirements document (PRD) in root REQUIREMENTS.md as user stories with checkable outcomes. Use for a new product or a change to what it should do.

16 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use agent-browser.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • VercelSkill

    agent-browser

    Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read the request, the existing REQUIREMENTS.md, and any research the user gave you.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    Ask the user about each product decision that is missing.

    line 16
  3. Very specific:

    Write one user story for each thing a user needs to do, with a REQ-n ID and at least one "Done when" a person could check.

    line 17
  4. Distinctive:

    Stop when the document is ready for review.

    line 18
  5. Very specific:

    Keep existing REQ-n IDs. Never reuse or renumber them.

    line 70
  6. Distinctive:

    Write from the user's side.

    line 71

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Requirements

Fill in this template in root REQUIREMENTS.md. It is the PRD for the whole product; keep it current. One feature goes in a spec, technical decisions in architecture.

Process

  1. Read the request, the existing REQUIREMENTS.md, and any research the user gave you.
  2. Ask the user about each product decision that is missing. Give your recommended answer with each question. Look up facts in the repository instead of asking.
  3. Write one user story for each thing a user needs to do, with a REQ-n ID and at least one "Done when" a person could check. Include what the user sees when something fails or is denied.
  4. Stop when the document is ready for review.

Template

# <Product> requirements

Status: Proposed | Accepted

## Problem and users

<Who has the problem, what goes wrong for them today, and the outcome they need.
Name each type of user once; the stories below use these names.>

## User stories

### REQ-1: <Short name>

As a <user>, I want to <action>, so that <benefit>.

Done when:
- <Observable result a person could check>
- <What the user sees when it fails or is denied>

### REQ-2: <Short name>

...

## Business rules

<Rules that hold across stories: permissions, limits, states, and what must never happen.>

## Constraints

<Required security, privacy, compatibility, and performance limits. Use numbers when known.
Mark unknown targets as open decisions.>

## Out of scope

<What this product does not do yet.>

## Success measures

<How to judge value after release, when there is evidence for a measure. Otherwise "None yet".>

## Open decisions

<Each unanswered question, your recommended answer, and what it blocks.>

Rules

  • Keep existing REQ-n IDs. Never reuse or renumber them.
  • Write from the user's side. Leave out how it will be built, unless a technology is required.
  • Label assumptions. Never invent research, targets, or rules.

Return

Report the path, the decisions made, and any blocking question.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.