performance-insights
Skill4 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub
Explain what changed in Google Ads performance and why, period over period, reconciled with GA4. Use when the user asks "why did cost per lead go up?", "what changed last week?", "how is Demand Gen doing?", "why did conversions drop?", or wants a quick performance brief.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- anthropics/commerce-agentstheir own version, first seen Aug 31, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- anthropics/commerce-agents★ 2.9ksame name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- ads-auditSkill
- campaign-architectSkill
- consent-auditSkill
- demand-gen-launchSkill
- event-auditSkill
- gtm-buildSkill
- monthly-reportSkill
- pre-launch-checkSkill
- search-launchSkill
- setupSkill
- tracking-auditSkill
- tracking-planSkill
- weekly-checkSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 25
Call account_profile first (currency, linked GA4).
- Very specific: line 31
Why, inside the top 1–3 campaigns: Use get_performance_by_date for the day the change started, then segment with run_gaql_query, for …
- Very specific: line 35
search terms: get_search_terms for the campaign and both periods (new expensive terms are a common cause)
- Very specific: line 40
Reconcile: If GA4 is linked, ga4_conversions and ga4_traffic_sources for both periods.
- Very specific: line 43
Read CPC/CTR/CPL movements with guide("benchmarks") in mind: they are ranges, not targets.
- Distinctive: line 59
Keep it under one screen. Name the evidence.
- Very specific: line 63
Never apply a change from this skill.
- Very specific: line 65
If the profile is read-only (no write tools), say that applying needs npx google-marketing-agent accounts set <alias> writes true and an …
- Distinctive: line 67
Never compare periods of different length or a period that includes today against full days.
- Distinctive: line 68
Never report "0 conversions" as "no leads" without the GA4 check in step 4.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Performance insights
Compare two periods, find the campaigns and segments behind the change, and check the conversions against GA4 before calling anything a drop.
When to use
A question about a change in spend, clicks, CPC, conversions, CPL or ROAS. For a full account review use ads-audit;
for the Monday routine use weekly-check.
Inputs
account: profile alias.- Periods: the user's, or last 7 days vs the 7 days before. Use
dateFrom/dateTo(YYYY-MM-DD) for both periods so they are exactly comparable. - The metric they care about (default: conversions and cost per conversion).
Steps
Call account_profile first (currency, linked GA4).
- Totals.
get_account_summaryfor each period. State the change in cost, clicks, CTR, CPC, conversions and cost per conversion as numbers and percentages. - Where.
get_campaign_performancefor each period. Rank campaigns by their contribution to the change (absolute difference in the metric, not percent). - Why, inside the top 1–3 campaigns. Use
get_performance_by_datefor the day the change started, then segment withrun_gaql_query, for example:- device:
SELECT segments.device, metrics.cost_micros, metrics.conversions FROM campaign WHERE campaign.id = <id> AND segments.date BETWEEN '<from>' AND '<to>' - network: same query with
segments.ad_network_type - search terms:
get_search_termsfor the campaign and both periods (new expensive terms are a common cause) - auction pressure:
metrics.search_impression_share,metrics.search_budget_lost_impression_share,metrics.search_rank_lost_impression_shareoncampaign - recent changes:
changes_list(changes made through this package) and, for Demand Gen,guide("demand-gen")on reading the first weeks.
- device:
- Reconcile. If GA4 is linked,
ga4_conversionsandga4_traffic_sourcesfor both periods. If GA4 lead events held steady while Ads conversions fell, the problem is measurement, not demand: say so and point toguide("measurement"). - Read CPC/CTR/CPL movements with
guide("benchmarks")in mind: they are ranges, not targets.
Output
# <alias>: <period A> vs <period B>
**What changed:** <one sentence with the main number>
| Metric | A | B | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
**Why:** 2–4 bullets, each with evidence (campaign, segment, number).
**Do next:** 2–3 actions, each naming the tool that would make the change.Keep it under one screen. Name the evidence; say "unclear" when the data doesn't explain the change.
Never
- Never apply a change from this skill. Suggest it; if the user says yes, preview it first (no
confirm), then apply after a second yes. - If the profile is read-only (no write tools), say that applying needs
npx google-marketing-agent accounts set <alias> writes trueand an MCP client restart. Never edit config files. - Never compare periods of different length or a period that includes today against full days.
- Never report "0 conversions" as "no leads" without the GA4 check in step 4.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

