observability-and-instrumentation
Skill3 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when adding or repairing logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting so production behavior is visible and diagnosable: a new service or integration, a feature that needs evidence it works, an incident that took too long to diagnose, alerts that page for the wrong thing. Not for release, rollout or rollback decisions (shipping-and-launch).
49 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xuweizhengo/skills-hubtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Agent-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- TheAstroByte/astrobyte-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MMACABRE/SKILLStheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- celestialdust/achilles-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- steven123397/nexuskit-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use constraint-driven-development, incremental-implementation and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MrCipherSmithSkillconstraint-driven-development
Use when a project needs a persistent, measurable quality bar — starting a project without documented standards, 'set up constraints', or when coverage/perf/a11y thresholds get re-debated per-PR. Produces CONSTRAINTS.md with enforceable numbers, ratchets, and a guard against silent weakening. NOT for throwaway prototypes or a one-off CI setup.
Also in 17 projects that use this
LLl0k0laDSkillincremental-implementation
Use when implementing any feature or change that touches more than one file. Use when you're about to write a large amount of code at once, or when a task feels too big to land in one step.
Also in 29 projects that use this
barisariburnuSkillperformance-optimization
Complete performance optimization guide for Next.js applications including frontend, backend, database, caching, and general optimization strategies. Use when improving performance, reducing bundle size, optimizing queries, or implementing caching.
Also in 31 projects that use this
silvainfmSkillmarketing-ideas
When the user needs marketing ideas, inspiration, or strategies for their SaaS or software product. Also use when the user asks for 'marketing ideas,' 'growth ideas,' 'how to market,' 'marketing strategies,' 'marketing tactics,' 'ways to promote,' or 'ideas to grow.' This skill provides 140 proven marketing approaches organized by category.
Also in 4 projects that use this
IgorGanapolskySkillgraphify
Query the local Graphify-Labs AST knowledge graph for ThumbGate architecture questions (what connects X to Y, explain a symbol, PreToolUse/gates/adapters). Slash: /graphify.
Also in 4 projects that use this
silvainfmSkillpricing-strategy
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' or 'monetization.' This skill covers pricing research, tier structure, and packaging strategy.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions49 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 49
- addyosmani/agent-skills★ 114ksame name
- ollaya-dev/ollaya★ 1.4ksame name
- songjiun10-collab/Senior-thinking-skills★ 87same name
- vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh★ 46same name
- jmxt3/gitscape.ai★ 33same name
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 22same name
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Agent-Skills★ 21same name
- afonsoft/skills★ 14same name
- HK-hub/AgentSkills★ 6same name
- Marvellbrazil/my-agentic-skills★ 4same name
39 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository55 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architecture-simplicitySkill
- autonomous-workSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- code-graph-reviewSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- dashboard-designSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-wikiSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- fable-judgeSkill
- fable-methodSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- money-path-safetySkill
- observability-and-instrumentationSkill
- ponytailSkill
- production-first-decisionsSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- testing-disciplineSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- web-researchSkill
- windows-encoding-fixesSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- architecture-simplicitySkill
- autonomous-workSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- code-graph-reviewSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- dashboard-designSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-wikiSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- fable-judgeSkill
- fable-methodSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- money-path-safetySkill
- ponytailSkill
- production-first-decisionsSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- testing-disciplineSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- web-researchSkill
- windows-encoding-fixesSkill
- writing-plansSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 45 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 54
Follow one request across components in the trace UI.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 45 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Observability and instrumentation
Instrumentation ships with the feature, like tests.
Define "working" first
List 2–4 questions on-call will ask — retry-adjusted success rate, why a case failed permanently, is the provider slow now. Every signal answers one; one that answers none is cost.
Scope per component
Instrument each component's boundary, not every function.
- Request-serving (HTTP, gRPC, queue): RED per route template — rate, errors by status class, duration histogram — plus saturation of the pool or queue it competes for, from middleware in one place. A specific question can justify more; a payment path may warrant a span per provider call.
- Job, worker: outcome, duration, items, retries, dead-letter count per run. Queue lag beats per-item logs; aggregate per job, no label per item.
- Library: nothing unbidden — take a logger and metrics handle from the host, or expose hooks; no private exporter, no stdout.
- CLI: exit code plus stderr diagnostic; structured output only for a supervisor.
Logs explain one case, metrics aggregate, traces localize across services — metrics say that, traces where, logs why. Cost is per event, per label set, per sampled request.
Logging
One structured object per business event, with a stable event name and stable, typed field names a query written today still matches next month; ids and codes rather than prose (event: payment_failed, provider, errorCode, attempt).
- Identifiers, not payloads: no bodies, tokens or full personal data even at debug; log an id or hash, pseudonymous where it names a person.
- One event per state change, not per loop iteration; a request or trace id where a path crosses components (service → queue → worker), since inside one process a stack trace suffices.
- Route library logging through your formatter, quiet the noisy ones in config, and redact known secret patterns in the collector: one forgotten call must not leak a token.
Metrics
Labels come from small fixed sets — never a user id, raw URL, error message or request id; a counter plus a log line answers "which one". Histograms with p50/p95/p99, since an average hides the tail; unit in the name (http_request_duration_seconds); counters up only; sample the hot path.
Tracing
OpenTelemetry, auto-instrumentation for HTTP, gRPC and database clients first. Span names describe the operation (GET /orders/:id), attributes only for keys you search by. Propagate context across process and queue boundaries — a trace stopping at the queue means the producer never injected it. Sample at the edge and record the choice.
Alerting
Alert on symptoms users feel; causes go on a dashboard (CPU at 85%, one restart). Each alert is actionable or becomes a ticket, links its runbook, takes its threshold from an SLO or measured baseline rather than a copied default, is page or ticket only, guards scope (a shared dashboard's baseline is not this service's), and resolves itself without re-paging.
Verify the telemetry itself
Wrong instrumentation argues with the incident:
- Force an error in staging; find it by request id.
- Send test traffic; confirm your labels appear — a label typo silently creates a new series.
- Follow one request across components in the trace UI.
- Fire each alert once by lowering its threshold, then restore it.
- Emit a synthetic canary secret through the logging path; confirm the collector redacts or rejects it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

