agentleFS
nuttakulsvnuttakulsv/think-like/skills/kahneman/SKILL.md

kahneman

Skill2 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub

Daniel Kahneman's tools against predictable errors in judgment: take the outside view (reference-class forecasting) before trusting your own estimate, run a pre-mortem (with Gary Klein's method) before committing, and separate fast intuition from slow checking. Use for estimates, deadlines, roadmaps, launch plans, hiring decisions, and any plan the team feels very confident about. Triggers: "think like Kahneman", "pre-mortem", "how long will this really take", "estimate", "planning fallacy", "are we overconfident", "คิดแบบคาห์เนมัน", "ประเมินเวลา", "pre-mortem".

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. rmarji/chiron-council★ 1same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Outside view first: Before estimating from the details of this project (the inside view), find the reference class: similar past projects, …

    line 31
  2. Distinctive:

    Write in the user's language.

    line 43

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Think like Kahneman

Psychologist and Nobel laureate in economics (2002), author of Thinking, Fast and Slow. His work with Amos Tversky showed that human judgment fails in consistent ways, which means the failures can be anticipated and partly corrected with simple procedures.

When to use

  • Any estimate of time, cost, or effort
  • A plan or launch that the team is very confident about
  • Choosing between candidates, vendors, or designs based on impressions

Method

  1. Outside view first. Before estimating from the details of this project (the inside view), find the reference class: similar past projects, tickets, or migrations. What did they actually take? Use their distribution as the starting point.
  2. Then adjust for real, specific differences, and keep the adjustment modest. If your estimate is far better than the reference class, write down why this case is truly different.
  3. Pre-mortem (Gary Klein's method): ask everyone to imagine the project has already failed badly, some months from now, and to write down every reason why. Collect the reasons independently before discussing. Turn the top risks into plan changes, not just a risk list.
  4. Check for the planning fallacy: plans that assume best-case progress, no sick days, no review cycles, no integration surprises.
  5. Slow down the fast system for important judgments: score options on a few predefined criteria independently before discussing, so the first opinion or the most confident voice doesn't anchor everyone.

Output

  • Reference class: similar past work and how long it really took (range)
  • Estimate: outside-view baseline → adjustments → final range (e.g. P50 and P90), not a single date
  • Pre-mortem: top failure reasons → plan changes
  • Bias check: anchoring, overconfidence, planning fallacy, where seen
  • Write in the user's language.

Anti-patterns

  • A single-date estimate with no range
  • Estimating only from the task breakdown (inside view)
  • Pre-mortems that turn into a list nobody acts on
  • Discussing options before people form independent judgments

Example (illustration)

User: How long to migrate our auth from sessions to JWT? The team says 2 weeks.

Reference class: last 4 auth or identity changes in this company took 3, 5, 6 and 9 weeks; industry write-ups of similar migrations commonly mention long tails from mobile clients.

Estimate: baseline 5–6 weeks; one adjustment: no mobile app this time (−1 week). P50 4.5 weeks, P90 7 weeks.

Pre-mortem: "It failed because…" refresh token storage was insecure; third-party SSO broke; old sessions couldn't be revoked during rollout. Plan changes: security review in week 1, SSO test environment set up first, dual-mode auth for two weeks.

Sources

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.