product-launch-enablement
Skill14 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build cross-functional launch readiness plans and field-ready launch assets for revenue teams. Use when the user asks for launch training, go/no-go gates, role readiness, owner handoffs, or post-launch adoption review. Route concise release translation to release-notes-to-seller-updates, partner or channel packages to partner-enablement-package, and quarter-wide prioritization to quarterly-enablement-planner.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- account-brief-builderSkill
- battlecard-builderSkill
- call-insights-to-objectionsSkill
- call-review-coachSkill
- case-study-extractorSkill
- certification-program-builderSkill
- content-gap-analysisSkill
- content-governance-systemSkill
- deal-inspection-coachSkill
- discovery-and-demo-structureSkill
- discovery-rubric-auditorSkill
- enablement-house-styleSkill
- enablement-impact-storySkill
- enablement-metrics-and-instrumentationSkill
- enablement-program-designSkill
- enablement-routerSkill
- executive-briefing-builderSkill
- field-feedback-synthesizerSkill
- forecast-risk-briefSkill
- manager-coaching-cadenceSkill
- mutual-action-plan-builderSkill
- objection-library-builderSkill
- onboarding-program-builderSkill
- onboarding-to-value-playbookSkill
- one-pager-and-slide-outlineSkill
- partner-enablement-packageSkill
- pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criteriaSkill
- proposal-rfp-orchestratorSkill
- qbr-ebr-builderSkill
- quarterly-enablement-plannerSkill
- release-notes-to-seller-updatesSkill
- renewal-and-expansion-enablementSkill
- revenue-enablement-contextSkill
- roleplay-scenario-builderSkill
- talk-track-builderSkill
- value-prop-and-positioningSkill
- win-loss-synthesisSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Ask only for the inputs that change readiness:
- Distinctive: line 30
If a date, eligibility rule, or claim is missing, leave it unknown.
- Distinctive: line 34
Read references/launch-readiness-framework.md for tiering, gate evidence, and the first decision window.
- Very specific: line 42
Test the capacity envelope.
- Distinctive: line 44
Write the field message by role.
- Distinctive: line 49
Check product truth, approved claims, eligibility, field readiness, and support.
- Very specific: line 53
Use confirmed cadence. If unknown, label it proposed and name who confirms it.
- Distinctive: line 70
Do not add a quarter roadmap or a partner-facing pack unless asked.
- Distinctive: line 77
Every field-facing claim has a named owner, or is marked blocked.
- Distinctive: line 80
No invented dates, eligibility, proof, or monitoring numbers.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Product launch enablement
Prepare each affected revenue role to explain a launch accurately and handle the customer situations it creates.
A launch package tells each role what changed, what did not, and what they should stop saying. If the user only wants a Slack or email update from the notes, use release-notes-to-seller-updates.
Ready. "From 20 August, AEs can mention Escalation Rules 2.0 to Pro and Enterprise buyers who inspect overdue handoffs. Existing rules keep running. Do not say migration is automatic."
Release note. "We shipped conditional triggers, team escalation, and audit history. Please share with your teams."
Make clear what each affected role must change in its customer work.
Inputs
Reuse supplied context first. If a missing company fact would change the result, check the relevant sections of .enablement/context.md when available. Preserve source dates and approval limits.
Ask only for the inputs that change readiness:
- What changed, and why the field should care
- Who must change behavior
- Known dates, rollout model, and approvals
- Approved claims and named claim owners
- Real delivery and manager capacity
If a date, eligibility rule, or claim is missing, leave it unknown. Do not invent launch dates, availability, or capacity.
Supporting material
Read references/launch-readiness-framework.md for tiering, gate evidence, and the first decision window. Read references/source-system-guide.md when the plan has to land in docs, Slack, an LMS, or a tracker.
Procedure
- Name the change and the non-change. One sentence for what is new. One for what still works the old way. One for the line sellers must retire. Done when all three are specific enough to inspect.
- Classify the launch from consequence, not breadth. Tier 1: optional awareness. Tier 2: a bounded behavior or handoff change that needs practice. Tier 3: pricing, contracts, regulation, customer transition, or hard-to-reverse ops. Breadth scales delivery; it does not promote a low-risk update. Done when you can say why this tier in one sentence.
- Test the capacity envelope.
Compare audience demand to facilitator, manager, and constrained-owner time. Return
fits,reduce,sequence, orblocked. Done when the binding constraint has an owner. - Write the field message by role. What changed. Why it matters. When to use it. What not to say. Done when AE, SE, CS, and manager each have a different next action, or you can say why they share one.
- Build only the kit this tier needs.
FAQ, talk-track change, objection notes, proof with source. Add runnable practice when Tier 2 or 3 requires it. Route a full spoken track to
talk-track-builder. - Set evidence-backed go/no-go gates. Check product truth, approved claims, eligibility, field readiness, and support. Demonstrate the changed task and verify the handoff with the responsible owner. Mark simulated tests as such. A gate needs evidence of a working path; document approval or attendance alone is insufficient.
- Map handoffs. PMM, enablement, sales, CS, RevOps, support. Done when a seller knows who to ping for eligibility, proof, pricing, and custom work.
- Set the first post-launch decision window.
Use confirmed cadence. If unknown, label it
proposedand name who confirms it. Do not invent numeric thresholds.
For a partner or channel pack use partner-enablement-package. For what will not happen this quarter use quarterly-enablement-planner.
What to return
Return the requested readiness plan or assets. For a complete launch package, include:
- Launch tier, one-sentence rationale, and what sellers should stop saying
- Role actions and the field message
- Capacity decision:
fits,reduce,sequence, orblocked - Owner and handoff matrix
- Gates with evidence, claim owner, decision owner, and status
- Training or practice only if this tier needs it
- First decision window, or a proposed window with a confirmation owner
- Assumptions and blockers
Do not add a quarter roadmap or a partner-facing pack unless asked. Do not publish or mark a gate ready without evidence.
Quality bar
- A seller can explain what changed, what did not, and what to stop saying.
- The affected roles can perform the changed task, with escalation routes for unresolved cases.
- Tier follows consequence, not audience size.
- Every field-facing claim has a named owner, or is marked blocked.
- Capacity is a decision, not a hidden overbook.
- A gate is ready only when the operational path works.
- No invented dates, eligibility, proof, or monitoring numbers.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

