agentleFS
nthnclrknthnclrk/enablement-skills/skills/enablement-router/SKILL.md

enablement-router

Skill14 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Route revenue enablement requests to the smallest coherent skill or sequence. Use when the user asks which skill to use, combines multiple enablement jobs, needs a staged workflow, or describes a performance problem without knowing the right enablement response. Route clear single-artifact requests directly to the corresponding specialist skill.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the user asked for a battlecard, do not send them through context, positioning, and a launch plan first.

    line 10
  2. Very specific:

    Add revenue-enablement-context only when missing or stale assumptions would weaken the first step.

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    Use one skill when it can complete the request.

    line 33
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep long sequences manageable.

    line 34

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Enablement router

Help the user choose the skill or short sequence that produces the result they need.

If the user asked for a battlecard, do not send them through context, positioning, and a launch plan first.

Direct. "Build the card with battlecard-builder. You already have the competitor and the claim limits."

Tour. "First we should establish context, then positioning, then a program charter, then the battlecard."

Route only, unless the user also asked you to do the work. Read references/route-map.md when two skills look alike.

When to route

Derive the job from the request before asking. Ask one question only when the answer changes the primary skill, the order, or the audience mode.

A performance problem with no diagnosed cause goes to enablement-program-design in discovery mode. If evidence points to product, incentives, capacity, or territory, identify the responsible owner and any limited enablement support that would still help.

Add revenue-enablement-context only when missing or stale assumptions would weaken the first step.

How to pick

  1. Translate the request into jobs and one observable end result. Done when you can name the artifact they will actually use.
  2. Drop related work nobody asked for.
  3. Match jobs to the route map. Use the boundary column when two skills look alike.
  4. Mark each step Available now or Additional skill needed. Do not invent install commands.
  5. Use one skill when it can complete the request. Add another only for a distinct requested deliverable or a genuinely required dependency.
  6. Keep long sequences manageable. Show the immediate phase, its completion evidence, and what would trigger the next phase rather than starting every related workflow at once.

What to return

Direct route: what to do next, primary skill and availability, nearest boundary, first input.

Sequence: a short table with order, skill, availability, job, handoff, and expected output. Not for a single-skill route.

Include assumptions, deferred work, and one starting action. A handoff packet is facts, conflicts, blocking unknowns, sources, requested output, and stop condition.

Done when

  • A direct specialist request reaches the relevant skill without unnecessary setup.
  • Unavailable skills are not presented as runnable.
  • The user can start immediately.
  • Related work stays deferred.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.