workflow-definitions
Skill1 starsChanged 48 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create, edit, delete, or verify Agent HQ Workflow Definitions page configuration.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- atlas-agent-hq-adminSkill
- cover-agentSkill
- create-agentSkill
- create-projectSkill
- create-taskSkill
- create-toolSkill
- task-routing-rulesSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
22 rules. About 0 are common, 21 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈21
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this whenever changing Agent HQ Workflow Definitions page configuration:
- Very specific: line 25
Do not invent workflow_type payload keys where the tool contract says workflow_type.
- Distinctive: line 29
Use Agent HQ MCP tools only.
- Distinctive: line 30
Do not use raw Agent HQ API calls for Workflow Definitions page config changes.
- Distinctive: line 31
Do not use direct SQL for Workflow Definitions page config changes.
- Distinctive: line 32
Do not edit local config files as a substitute for changing Agent HQ Workflow Definitions.
- Distinctive: line 33
If an MCP tool does not exist for the needed Workflow Definitions change, stop and escalate instead of inventing an API or SQL workaround.
- Distinctive: line 37
Before writing, decide the target scope explicitly:
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not edit a project-wide or workflow-type default when the user asked for a one-off workflow change.
- Distinctive: line 47
Do not create a one-off override when the user asked for a reusable definition.
- Distinctive: line 52
Read the existing Workflow Definitions configuration through MCP.
- Distinctive: line 55
Read back the exact target configuration after the write.
- Distinctive: line 56
Verify any affected inherited behavior, especially status availability, task-type availability, field requirements, gates, and transitions.
- Distinctive: line 61
Before changing task/status definitions:
- Distinctive: line 64
Prefer adding a new allowed value over renaming/removing an active one unless migration is part of the task.
- Distinctive: line 66
Before changing field schemas:
- Distinctive: line 68
Do not make fields required unless they block safe dispatch, handoff, or verification.
- Distinctive: line 69
Read back stored JSON/schema shape after writing.
- Distinctive: line 71
Before changing gates or workflow defaults:
- Distinctive: line 72
Verify the matching lifecycle transition still exists.
- Distinctive: line 73
Do not weaken QA/review requirements casually.
- Distinctive: line 74
Never manually set QA outcomes or advance QA lanes as part of verification.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Workflow Definitions
Use this whenever changing Agent HQ Workflow Definitions page configuration:
- workflow types
- workflow type task/status definitions
- allowed task types
- task field schemas
- status templates
- workflow/status defaults shown or edited from Workflow Definitions
- evidence gate requirements when they are part of the Workflow Definitions workflow
Naming Compatibility
The product surface is Workflow Definitions. MCP tool names have completed the rename; machine-readable payload fields have not:
- MCP tools are named
agent_hq_*_workflow_type*(for exampleagent_hq_list_workflow_types). Each tool has exactly one name — theworkflow_typespellings and theatlas_*names are gone. - Payload and response fields still use
workflow_type,workflow_id, and similar keys. - Do not invent
workflow_typepayload keys where the tool contract saysworkflow_type.
Core Rules
- Use Agent HQ MCP tools only.
- Do not use raw Agent HQ API calls for Workflow Definitions page config changes.
- Do not use direct SQL for Workflow Definitions page config changes.
- Do not edit local config files as a substitute for changing Agent HQ Workflow Definitions.
- If an MCP tool does not exist for the needed Workflow Definitions change, stop and escalate instead of inventing an API or SQL workaround.
Scope Decision
Before writing, decide the target scope explicitly:
- project
- workflow type
- task type
- status
- field schema
- gate or workflow default
Do not edit a project-wide or workflow-type default when the user asked for a one-off workflow change. Do not create a one-off override when the user asked for a reusable definition.
Workflow
- Resolve the target project and workflow type from Agent HQ.
- Read the existing Workflow Definitions configuration through MCP.
- Identify the smallest config object that must change.
- Apply the change through Agent HQ MCP only.
- Read back the exact target configuration after the write.
- Verify any affected inherited behavior, especially status availability, task-type availability, field requirements, gates, and transitions.
- Report what changed and which project/workflow type it affects.
Safety Checks
Before changing task/status definitions:
- Confirm existing tasks will not be stranded in removed statuses.
- Confirm assignment rules and transitions still reference valid statuses and task types.
- Prefer adding a new allowed value over renaming/removing an active one unless migration is part of the task.
Before changing field schemas:
- Preserve existing field keys unless the user explicitly asks for a schema migration.
- Do not make fields required unless they block safe dispatch, handoff, or verification.
- Read back stored JSON/schema shape after writing.
Before changing gates or workflow defaults:
- Verify the matching lifecycle transition still exists.
- Do not weaken QA/review requirements casually.
- Never manually set QA outcomes or advance QA lanes as part of verification.
Output Standard
When finished, include:
- project id/name
- workflow type or definition changed
- specific config objects changed
- MCP readback result
- any follow-up needed for assignment rules, model routing, tasks, or agents
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

