create-project
Skill1 starsChanged 48 days agoMITView on GitHub
Bootstrap a new Agent HQ project end-to-end: create the project, stand up the initial workflow/board, add the required jobs/roles, and define assignment rules so tasks dispatch correctly. Use when the user asks to add a new project to Agent HQ, create a new client or internal project, or make a new project with a requested team mix such as DEV, QA, PM, frontend, backend, or trader.
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- shkodnik1917/claude-brainlabtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Melvynx/ai-maxxing-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- penroe-ai/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Vepricov/claude-brainlabtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- buildpad-ai/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 16, 2026
- BibekBhusal0/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use json-canvas, webapp-testing and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
wangzhuofengSkilljson-canvas
Create and edit JSON Canvas files (.canvas) with nodes, edges, groups, and connections. Use when working with .canvas files, creating visual canvases, mind maps, flowcharts, or when the user mentions Canvas files in Obsidian.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JetBrainsSkillwebapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgrill-me
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- VeryGoodOpenSource/vgv-ai-flutter-plugin★ 176same name
- shkodnik1917/claude-brainlab★ 35same name
- Vepricov/claude-brainlab★ 35same name
- Melvynx/ai-maxxing-skills★ 32same name
- andresanemic/lore-plugin★ 7same name
- dqtx760/skills-manage★ 2same name
- BibekBhusal0/skills★ 1same name
- buildpad-ai/skills★ 1same name
- penroe-ai/skills★ 1same name
- squarerf/claude-skills★ 1same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- atlas-agent-hq-adminSkill
- cover-agentSkill
- create-agentSkill
- create-taskSkill
- create-toolSkill
- task-routing-rulesSkill
- workflow-definitionsSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
18
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Create projects as complete operating systems, not empty containers.
- Distinctive: line 10
Use this skill to perform the full Agent HQ bootstrap:
- Distinctive: line 12
create the initial workflow / board
- Distinctive: line 13
create the required jobs
- Distinctive: line 15
verify the project can actually receive and dispatch work
- Distinctive: line 35
If the user already implied the team (for example "include DEV, QA"), do not re-ask obvious questions.
- Distinctive: line 52
Create only the roles the user asked for or that are clearly necessary.
- Distinctive: line 60
Every job should have:
- Distinctive: line 68
Do not leave the project half-configured.
- Distinctive: line 69
If the project is meant to auto-dispatch, add assignment rules during setup.
- Distinctive: line 85
no obvious dispatch gap remains
- Distinctive: line 99
Create one by default unless:
- Distinctive: line 105
Create assignment rules whenever the user expects the project to operate immediately.
- Distinctive: line 106
If the user asks for a new project with roles, assume assignment is part of the bootstrap.
- Distinctive: line 110
Use the standard Agent HQ task types:
- Distinctive: line 122
Do not invent new task types.
- Distinctive: line 126
Use these defaults unless the project clearly needs a different split:
- Distinctive: line 144
Avoid these failure modes:
- Very specific: line 153
Read references/checklist.md when executing the bootstrap so nothing gets skipped.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create Project
Create projects as complete operating systems, not empty containers.
Use this skill to perform the full Agent HQ bootstrap:
- create the project
- create the initial workflow / board
- create the required jobs
- create assignment rules
- verify the project can actually receive and dispatch work
Trigger examples
This skill should activate for requests like:
- "Create a new client project for X"
- "Set up a new internal project with PM, SWE, QA, and routing"
- "Let's add a new project to Agent HQ"
- "Make a new project for XYZ client, include DEV and QA"
Workflow
Clarify only the missing structural inputs Resolve these before creating anything:
- project name
- client vs internal
- initial team / jobs needed
- whether a workflow / board should be created immediately
- whether routing should be added now
If the user already implied the team (for example "include DEV, QA"), do not re-ask obvious questions.
- Create the project shell first
Capture the minimum useful project metadata:
- name
- description / goal
- status
- client/internal context if supported
- Create the initial workflow / board
Unless the user says otherwise, create one active starter workflow so tasks have a home.
Name it based on the project's first phase, for example:
Launch WorkflowWorkflow 1 — SetupImplementation Workflow
Provision the jobs required to operate the project Create only the roles the user asked for or that are clearly necessary.
Common defaults:
- implementation work → Software Engineer / Backend / Frontend
- verification work → QA Tester
- planning / routing → PM
- trading / operational execution → Trader / Ops
Every job should have:
- clear title
- linked agent
- project_id
- sane timeout / dispatch settings
- job_instructions appropriate to the role
Create assignment rules immediately Do not leave the project half-configured. If the project is meant to auto-dispatch, add assignment rules during setup.
Default routing pattern:
- build work (
frontend,backend,fullstack,data) → implementation job onready - review / verification → QA job on
review qawork → QA job onready- ops / execution work → trader or ops job on
ready pmwork → PM job onreadyother→ the most sensible generalist lane for the project
- build work (
- Verify the bootstrap is operational
Check:
- project exists
- workflow exists
- jobs exist and are attached to the correct project
- assignment rules exist for the intended task types
- no obvious dispatch gap remains
- Report the result cleanly
Summarize:
- project created
- workflow created
- jobs created
- assignment rules created
- any follow-up still needed
Decision rules
When to create a workflow automatically
Create one by default unless:
- the user explicitly wants only the project shell
- the project is archival / inactive from day one
When to create assignment automatically
Create assignment rules whenever the user expects the project to operate immediately. If the user asks for a new project with roles, assume assignment is part of the bootstrap.
How to choose task types
Use the standard Agent HQ task types:
frontendbackendfullstackqadesignmarketingpmopsdataother
Do not invent new task types.
Role-to-assignment heuristics
Use these defaults unless the project clearly needs a different split:
- Single dev + QA project:
frontend,backend,fullstack,data→ devreview,qa→ QA
- Product / agency project:
pm→ PM- implementation types → dev / frontend / backend as appropriate
review,qa→ QA
- Trading / operations project:
ops,other→ trader / ops- implementation types → engineer
review,qa→ QA
Quality bar
A good project bootstrap means a later task can be created without manual cleanup.
Avoid these failure modes:
- project exists but no workflow exists
- jobs exist but are attached to the wrong project
- jobs exist but assignment rules are missing
- assignment rules exist but task types are inconsistent with the project's actual workflow
- creating the project without enough structure for work to flow
References
Read references/checklist.md when executing the bootstrap so nothing gets skipped.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

