factory-standup
Skill9 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Dev standup — open Linear tickets grouped by in-flight, top priority, and backlog
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- guidance/claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- factory-animationSkill
- factory-api-route-engineerSkill
- factory-apiSkill
- factory-authSkill
- factory-auth-wiring-specialistSkill
- factory-ciSkill
- factory-closeSkill
- factory-code-reviewerSkill
- factory-commitsSkill
- factory-data-layerSkill
- factory-data-pipeline-engineerSkill
- factory-data-pipelinesSkill
- factory-db-migration-engineerSkill
- factory-db-migrationSkill
- factory-db-schema-architectSkill
- factory-deploymentSkill
- factory-designSkill
- factory-entrySkill
- factory-feature-architectSkill
- factory-forms-builderSkill
- factory-formsSkill
- factory-frontend-engineerSkill
- factory-frontendSkill
- factory-kit-auditSkill
- factory-llm-workflow-engineerSkill
- factory-llm-workflowsSkill
- factory-observabilitySkill
- factory-pitfallsSkill
- factory-promptingSkill
- factory-promptSkill
- factory-releaseSkill
- factory-security-engineerSkill
- factory-securitySkill
- factory-setup-linearSkill
- factory-stackSkill
- factory-state-modelingSkill
- factory-submitSkill
- factory-testingSkill
- factory-verification-engineerSkill
- factory-verificationSkill
- factory-voiceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 10
Read project configuration: Prefer .factory-kit/linear.json.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
You're giving the user a dev-standup view of their open Linear work in this project. The goal is to answer "what's in flight, what's the top priority, what's waiting?" without making them open Linear in a browser.
What to do
- Read project configuration. Prefer
.factory-kit/linear.json. If it is absent, read legacy.claude/linear.jsonas a migration fallback and tell the user to run the setup-linear workflow to migrate. If neither exists, stop and direct the user to setup-linear. - Resolve scope. Pull
teamIdfrom the config. IfprojectIdis present, scope to that project; otherwise stay team-wide. - List open issues through the connected Linear integration:
team: <teamId>project: <projectId>(if present in config)statefiltered to open states only (excludeDone,Completed,Cancelled,Duplicate)- Sort by priority (Urgent → High → Normal → Low), then by updated date desc
Return a tight status (≤ 300 words):
Project: name + active milestone if present, or just team name if no project scope
In progress — issues in
In Progress(or whatever the team's equivalent active state is). One line per issue:<TEAM-N> — title (assignee if not me).In review — issues in
In Review. Same format. Surface stale ones (> 3 days).Top priority (next up) —
UrgentandHigh-priority open issues not yet started. Order by priority then update date. Show 5–8.Backlog — count + a sample of 3–5 from
Todo/Backlogstates, prioritized.Blocked (only if any) — issues with open
blockedBy. Show what's blocking each.One-line recommendation: the single best issue to pick up next, given priority and blockers. Cite the portable entry workflow with
<TEAM-N>; in Claude, preserve the compatibility form/entry <TEAM-N>.
Style
Follow factory-voice.md. Tight, glanceable lines — the user is scanning for a decision, not reading a report. Don't reprint full descriptions; titles only. Always cite issue IDs in canonical form (e.g., NON-45). The recommendation at the end is a call, not a suggestion — name the reason in one clause ("highest priority, no blockers" / "in review > 3 days, unblock the reviewer first").
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

