factory-observability
Skill9 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Observability conventions across builds. PostHog + Sentry on day one (non-negotiable per the factory thesis — easiest to start early, most expensive to backfill). Request tracing with propagated trace IDs, structured logging, activity-log audit table, event tagging by tool/feature for per-tool usage queryability, PostHog ingest-URL rewrite to avoid ad-blocker breakage. What to log, what NOT to log (PII).
- Reads credentials
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- guidance/claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- factory-animationSkill
- factory-api-route-engineerSkill
- factory-apiSkill
- factory-authSkill
- factory-auth-wiring-specialistSkill
- factory-ciSkill
- factory-closeSkill
- factory-code-reviewerSkill
- factory-commitsSkill
- factory-data-layerSkill
- factory-data-pipeline-engineerSkill
- factory-data-pipelinesSkill
- factory-db-migration-engineerSkill
- factory-db-migrationSkill
- factory-db-schema-architectSkill
- factory-deploymentSkill
- factory-designSkill
- factory-entrySkill
- factory-feature-architectSkill
- factory-forms-builderSkill
- factory-formsSkill
- factory-frontend-engineerSkill
- factory-frontendSkill
- factory-kit-auditSkill
- factory-llm-workflow-engineerSkill
- factory-llm-workflowsSkill
- factory-pitfallsSkill
- factory-promptingSkill
- factory-promptSkill
- factory-releaseSkill
- factory-security-engineerSkill
- factory-securitySkill
- factory-setup-linearSkill
- factory-stackSkill
- factory-standupSkill
- factory-state-modelingSkill
- factory-submitSkill
- factory-testingSkill
- factory-verification-engineerSkill
- factory-verificationSkill
- factory-voiceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 67
Principle: Every event carries a feature and surface tag.
- Distinctive: line 117
Principle: Every request carries a trace ID.
- Distinctive: line 150
Principle: Every log line is a structured record (JSON or equivalent).
- Distinctive: line 218
Recipe: Don't log:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Factory observability
Each section leads with Principle (one sentence, stack-agnostic), then Why (constraint → option → tradeoff), then Recipe (the PostHog / Sentry / pino / structlog shape we use), and Failure mode when there's one to name.
Day-one stack — observability before features
Principle. PostHog + Sentry + trace IDs + structured logs go in on day one, before the first feature ships.
Why. Observability is the build's most asymmetric cost-vs-value: cheap on day one (an SDK install and a config block), expensive to backfill (every event needs a redeploy, session-replay data starts empty, six months of usage history is lost). The trap is treating it as "we'll add when we need it" — by the time you need it, the data you'd want doesn't exist.
Recipe.
| Layer | Tool | Purpose |
| Product analytics | PostHog | Per-feature usage, funnels, session replay |
| Error tracking | Sentry | Exceptions, performance, source maps |
| Audit log | DB table (admin_actions or audit_log) | Mutation provenance, regulatory compliance |
| Request tracing | Trace ID middleware + logs | Cross-service debugging |
| Structured logs | pino (Node) / structlog (Python) | Searchable, machine-parseable |
PostHog — client setup with ingest rewrite
Principle. PostHog ingest goes through your own domain via Next.js rewrites; ad-blockers drop direct PostHog calls.
Why. Browser-level ad-blockers (uBlock, Brave's shield) recognize i.posthog.com and drop ~30% of events in aggregate. Routing through /ingest on your own domain bypasses the blocklist — the events arrive, the analytics are accurate. The cost is one rewrite block; the savings are ~30% of every funnel calculation you'll ever do.
Recipe.
// src/components/PostHogProvider.tsx
'use client';
import posthog from 'posthog-js';
import { PostHogProvider } from 'posthog-js/react';
import { useEffect } from 'react';
if (typeof window !== 'undefined') {
posthog.init(process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY!, {
api_host: '/ingest', // proxied — see rewrites below
capture_pageview: false, // we call manually with route context
person_profiles: 'identified_only',
});
}
export function PHProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
return <PostHogProvider client={posthog}>{children}</PostHogProvider>;
}// next.config.js — rewrite ingest URL to bypass ad-blockers
async rewrites() {
return [
{ source: '/ingest/static/:path*', destination: 'https://us-assets.i.posthog.com/static/:path*' },
{ source: '/ingest/:path*', destination: 'https://us.i.posthog.com/:path*' },
];
}Event tagging — feature + surface, always
Principle. Every event carries a feature and surface tag; per-feature usage queries depend on it.
Why. Six months in, the question is "which features earn their maintenance cost?" That question is a GROUP BY feature away if the events are tagged, and a complete loss if they're not. Tagging on every event is one extra line; not tagging is a year of usage data that can't be sliced.
Recipe.
posthog.capture('customer_created', {
feature: 'customers', // which feature folder
surface: 'customers_drawer', // which surface
org_id: orgId,
source: 'manual', // vs 'import' vs 'api'
});Later: SELECT feature, count(*) FROM events GROUP BY feature ORDER BY 2 DESC is the answer to "which features earn their maintenance cost?"
Sentry — exception capture with user scope after auth
Principle. Exceptions are scoped to the user that triggered them; user context is attached after auth, not before.
Why. An exception without user context is a haystack — "something broke for someone." With user context, the same exception is "this broke for user X, here's their session." Attaching context after auth (rather than at module init) keeps anonymous traffic anonymous in the error stream and identified traffic identified.
Recipe.
// sentry.client.config.ts / sentry.server.config.ts
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/nextjs';
Sentry.init({
dsn: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_SENTRY_DSN,
tracesSampleRate: 0.1, // 10% perf sampling
replaysSessionSampleRate: 0.0,
replaysOnErrorSampleRate: 1.0, // capture session on error
environment: process.env.VERCEL_ENV ?? 'development',
});# Python — Sentry SDK
import sentry_sdk
sentry_sdk.init(
dsn=os.environ['SENTRY_DSN'],
traces_sample_rate=0.1,
environment=os.environ.get('ENV', 'development'),
)Trace ID — propagate, don't regenerate
Principle. Every request carries a trace ID; if the caller sent one, propagate it; if not, generate it. Always echo it in the response.
Why. Trace IDs lose half their value if they break across service boundaries. A request that hits Next.js → Cloud Run service A → Cloud Run service B should carry the same ID through all three. Regenerating at each hop forces the support engineer to align three IDs by hand; propagating means one ID lines up across all three logs.
Recipe.
# Python / FastAPI
@app.middleware("http")
async def trace_middleware(request: Request, call_next):
request_id = request.headers.get("x-request-id") or str(uuid.uuid4())
request.state.request_id = request_id
response = await call_next(request)
response.headers["x-request-id"] = request_id
return response// Next.js middleware
export function middleware(req: NextRequest) {
const requestId = req.headers.get('x-request-id') ?? crypto.randomUUID();
const res = NextResponse.next();
res.headers.set('x-request-id', requestId);
return res;
}Log the request ID with every structured log line.
Failure mode. Generating a new trace ID at every service hop — cross-service debugging requires manual log alignment, and the support conversation becomes "approximately what time?"
Structured logging — never console.log strings
Principle. Every log line is a structured record (JSON or equivalent); never raw string concatenation.
Why. A grep over pino JSON logs lets you filter by user_id, action, request_id, duration_ms. A grep over string-concatenated logs is "did the substring match?" — every new query is a new regex, no aggregation is possible. The cost of structured logging is one logger import; the benefit is every future incident investigation.
Recipe.
// Node — pino
import pino from 'pino';
export const logger = pino({
level: process.env.LOG_LEVEL ?? 'info',
formatters: { level: (label) => ({ level: label }) },
base: { service: 'web', env: process.env.VERCEL_ENV },
});
logger.info({ user_id, request_id, action: 'customer.create' }, 'created customer');# Python — structlog
import structlog
log = structlog.get_logger().bind(service='fleetsim')
log.info('simulation_started', request_id=request_id, fleet_id=fleet_id)Activity log — DB-backed audit trail, fire-and-forget
Principle. Audit logging at the mutation boundary is fire-and-forget; same principle as the API layer.
Why. See factory-api.md §audit logging at mutation boundary and factory-data-layer.md §activity log table.
Recipe.
// fire-and-forget — never blocks mutations
export async function logAdminAction(input: {
actor_id: string;
action: string;
subject_type?: string;
subject_id?: string;
metadata?: Record<string, unknown>;
}): Promise<void> {
try {
await db.insert(adminActions).values(input);
} catch (err) {
logger.error({ err, input }, 'audit_log_write_failed');
}
}Schema in factory-data-layer.md. Use for regulatory compliance, support investigations, customer-facing "who changed this?" displays.
What to log
Recipe only — the inclusion list.
- Actions and IDs:
{ user_id: 'u_xyz', action: 'updated_ssn', subject_id: 'c_abc' } - Request context: trace ID, user agent (high-level), feature/surface tag
- Counts and durations:
{ duration_ms: 142, rows_affected: 3 } - External system call results: status code, request ID echoed back (Stripe, Twilio, etc.)
What NOT to log
Principle. Log actions and IDs, never payloads. PII in logs creates compliance scope creep.
Why. Same principle as factory-security.md §logging — log actions and IDs, not payloads. Once payloads with PII land in the log stream, the log stream inherits the PII's protection requirements.
Recipe. Don't log:
- Raw PII / PHI payloads: full SSN, government IDs, financial account numbers
- Auth tokens / API keys: at any layer, ever
- Full request bodies: redact at the logger layer if you need to debug
- Decrypted ciphertext: see
factory-security.md
Source patterns
Encode/monorepo (PostHog setup, ingest URL rewrite, PHProvider component), cothon (request logging middleware with trace ID propagation, x-request-id response header), kairos (adminActions table, fire-and-forget logAdminAction), fleet-advisor (activity logging at router-layer with action/object metadata), Obsidian software-factory-idea (PostHog + Sentry day-one commitment, per-tool usage queryability as layer-10 thesis).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

