agentleFS
nodealchemynodealchemy/powernode-platform/.claude/skills/verify/SKILL.md

verify

Skill4 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run targeted verification based on what changed since last commit

188 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-export

    Export instincts from project/global scope to a file

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-import

    Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AviadPSkill

    risk-assess

    Assess the risk and blast radius of a proposed code change before implementing it. Evaluates CI impact, framework-wide vs localized scope, rollback path, and identifies blindspots. Use when user says "what's the risk", "is this safe", "assess the impact", "risk assess", "blast radius", or before applying framework-wide or CI-affecting changes. Do NOT use for code quality review (use code-quality) or plan validation (use design-validator).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • diego-tobalinaSkill

    build-fix

    Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • AaravChadhaSkill

    secure

    Security review with a confidence gate - a finding exists only with a concrete exploit scenario and a high/medium/low confidence rating; everything else goes to a worth-hardening list, never inflated. Sweeps five surfaces: auth gates, secrets hygiene, injection and unsafe sinks, unsafe deserialization/crypto/transport, and LLM tool-use trust boundaries. Reports only, never fixes. Use when the user asks for a security review or to check vulnerabilities, secrets, or auth.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ArvorCoSkill

    specify

    Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • +1 more from TheKREATORS

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run focused quality checks based on what actually changed.

    line 10
  2. Very specific:

    If scope is auto or no argument provided, detect what changed:

    line 14
  3. Very specific:

    If a specific scope is given (ruby, typescript, migration, seed), only run that category.

    line 32
  4. Very specific:

    Syntax check: all changed .rb files:

    line 36
  5. Very specific:

    Find related tests: Look for *.test.ts or *.test.tsx alongside changed files

    line 55
  6. Very specific:

    If any migrations are down, run them:

    line 67
  7. Distinctive:

    If all pass: "Safe to commit." If any fail: List specific failures with file paths and error messages.

    line 95
  8. Distinctive:

    If any fail: List specific failures with file paths and error messages.

    line 96

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/verify — Targeted Change Verification

Run focused quality checks based on what actually changed. Faster than validate.sh, more thorough than hooks.

Step 1: Detect Changes

If scope is auto or no argument provided, detect what changed:

# Changed Ruby files (unstaged + staged + untracked)
git diff --name-only HEAD -- '*.rb' 2>/dev/null
git diff --cached --name-only -- '*.rb' 2>/dev/null
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard -- '*.rb' 2>/dev/null

# Changed TypeScript files
git diff --name-only HEAD -- '*.ts' '*.tsx' 2>/dev/null
git diff --cached --name-only -- '*.ts' '*.tsx' 2>/dev/null
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard -- '*.ts' '*.tsx' 2>/dev/null

# Changed migrations and seeds
git diff --name-only HEAD -- 'server/db/migrate/' 2>/dev/null
git diff --name-only HEAD -- 'server/db/seeds/' 2>/dev/null

If a specific scope is given (ruby, typescript, migration, seed), only run that category.

Step 2: Ruby Verification (if .rb files changed)

  1. Syntax check all changed .rb files:
    ruby -c <file>  # for each changed file
  2. Find related specs: Map each changed source file to its spec:
    • app/models/foo.rb → spec/models/foo_spec.rb
    • app/services/foo.rb → spec/services/foo_spec.rb
    • app/controllers/api/v1/foo_controller.rb → spec/requests/api/v1/foo_spec.rb or foo_controller_spec.rb
  3. Run related specs (only those that exist):
    cd server && bundle exec rspec <spec-files> --format progress

Step 3: TypeScript Verification (if .ts/.tsx files changed)

  1. Type check the full frontend project:
    cd frontend && npx tsc --noEmit
  2. Find related tests: Look for *.test.ts or *.test.tsx alongside changed files
  3. Run related tests (if they exist):
    cd frontend && CI=true npm test -- --testPathPatterns "<pattern>" --watchAll=false

Step 4: Migration Verification (if migration files changed)

  1. Check migration status:
    cd server && bundle exec rails db:migrate:status
  2. If any migrations are down, run them:
    cd server && bundle exec rails db:migrate

Step 5: Seed Verification (if seed files changed)

  1. Run seeds:
    cd server && bundle exec rails db:seed
  2. Report success or failure with specific error context.

Step 6: Report

Present results as a summary table:

| Category    | Status    | Details              |
|-------------|-----------|----------------------|
| Ruby syntax | PASS/FAIL | N files checked      |
| Ruby specs  | PASS/FAIL/SKIP | N specs, M failures |
| TypeScript  | PASS/FAIL | N errors             |
| TS tests    | PASS/FAIL/SKIP | N tests run     |
| Migrations  | PASS/FAIL/N/A  | N pending       |
| Seeds       | PASS/FAIL/N/A  | status          |

If all pass: "Safe to commit." If any fail: List specific failures with file paths and error messages.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.