agentleFS
nitinjain999nitinjain999/platform-skills/skills/observability/SKILL.md

observability

Skill71 starsChanged 8 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Instrument services with structured logging, Prometheus metrics, and OpenTelemetry tracing. Build Grafana dashboards, write Prometheus alerting rules, run k6 load tests, and plan infrastructure capacity.

  • Installs packages

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

18 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 62 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 13

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When invoked with no arguments, ask before proceeding:

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Add the three pillars — logs, metrics, traces — to a service.

    line 43
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask for: language/framework, existing logging library (if any), metrics backend (Prometheus / Datadog / CloudWatch), tracing backend …

    line 46
  4. Very specific:

    Add structured JSON logging with correlation IDs (Pino for Node.js, structlog for Python)

    line 47
  5. Distinctive:

    Add OpenTelemetry tracing with span attributes on critical paths

    line 49
  6. Very specific:

    Add /healthz and /readyz health check endpoints

    line 51
  7. Distinctive:

    Document what NOT to log (passwords, tokens, PII)

    line 52
  8. Distinctive:

    Create a Grafana dashboard for a service.

    line 60
  9. Distinctive:

    Add threshold lines at SLO boundaries

    line 66
  10. Distinctive:

    Write Prometheus alerting rules for a service.

    line 75
  11. Very specific:

    Write alert expressions using rate() over 5m windows

    line 79
  12. Very specific:

    Add severity label (critical / warning) and runbook annotation to every alert

    line 81
  13. Distinctive:

    Every alert needs a runbook URL

    line 86
  14. Distinctive:

    Write and run a k6 load test.

    line 97
  15. Distinctive:

    Ask for: target endpoint, expected peak RPS, SLO thresholds (p95 latency, error rate)

    line 100
  16. Distinctive:

    Write ramp-up → steady-state → ramp-down stages

    line 101
  17. Very specific:

    Add check() assertions on status code and response time

    line 103
  18. Distinctive:

    Add 50% headroom for spikes

    line 120

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 62 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Set up or improve observability for a service or platform component.


Interactive Wizard (fires when no arguments are provided)

When invoked with no arguments, ask before proceeding:

Q1 — Mode?

What do you need?
  1. instrument — add structured logs, Prometheus metrics, and OTel tracing to a service
  2. dashboard  — create a Grafana RED/USE dashboard for a service
  3. alert      — write Prometheus alerting rules for a service
  4. slo        — define SLIs, error budgets, and SLO burn-rate alerts
  5. loadtest   — write and run a k6 load test
  6. capacity   — estimate resource requirements and HPA configuration

Enter 1–6 or mode name:

Q2 — Context (after mode selected):

  • instrument: What language/framework and which metrics/tracing backend (Prometheus, Datadog, Jaeger, Tempo)?
  • dashboard: Service name and which signal to lead with — request-based (RED) or resource-based (USE)?
  • alert: Service name and what SLIs matter most — error rate, latency, availability?
  • slo: Service name, expected availability target (e.g. 99.9%), and current p95 latency baseline:
  • loadtest: Target endpoint, expected peak RPS, and SLO thresholds (p95 latency, max error rate):
  • capacity: Expected peak RPS, measured p99 latency at current load, and memory per pod:

Mode: instrument

Add the three pillars — logs, metrics, traces — to a service.

Steps:

  1. Ask for: language/framework, existing logging library (if any), metrics backend (Prometheus / Datadog / CloudWatch), tracing backend (Jaeger / Tempo / OTLP)
  2. Add structured JSON logging with correlation IDs (Pino for Node.js, structlog for Python)
  3. Instrument RED metrics: http_requests_total counter, http_request_duration_seconds histogram, per route and status
  4. Add OpenTelemetry tracing with span attributes on critical paths
  5. Expose /metrics scrape endpoint (Prometheus) or configure push exporter
  6. Add /healthz and /readyz health check endpoints
  7. Document what NOT to log (passwords, tokens, PII)

Reference: references/observability.md → Structured Logging, Prometheus Metrics, OpenTelemetry Tracing

→ Next: Run /platform-skills:observability alert to write alerting rules for the metrics just added, then /platform-skills:observability slo to wrap them in an error budget.

Mode: dashboard

Create a Grafana dashboard for a service.

Steps:

  1. Choose method: RED (request-based services) or USE (resource-based infrastructure)
  2. Define panels: request rate, error rate %, p50/p95/p99 latency, active connections, queue depth
  3. Set meaningful Y-axis units (req/s, ms, %)
  4. Add threshold lines at SLO boundaries
  5. Configure template variables for environment and service filtering

Reference: references/observability.md → Grafana Dashboards

→ Next: Run /platform-skills:observability slo to add SLO burn-rate alerts and an error budget panel to this dashboard.

Mode: alert

Write Prometheus alerting rules for a service.

Steps:

  1. Identify SLIs: error rate, latency percentiles, availability
  2. Write alert expressions using rate() over 5m windows
  3. Set for: duration ≥ 1m to suppress transient noise
  4. Add severity label (critical / warning) and runbook annotation to every alert
  5. Validate: no alert fires on healthy baseline, alert fires on injected fault

Alert design rules:

  • Page on symptoms (error rate, latency), not causes (CPU %)
  • Every alert needs a runbook URL
  • Derive SLO burn-rate alerts from error budget, not raw thresholds

Reference: references/observability.md → Alerting Rules

Security posture and CVE alerts from Kubescape's exporter (kubescape_controls_total_*, kubescape_vulnerabilities_*; failing scans show only in the scanner's logs, not in these metrics) → /platform-skills:kubescape-operator metrics.

→ Next: Run /platform-skills:observability slo to promote these symptom alerts to proper SLO burn-rate alerts backed by an error budget.

Mode: loadtest

Write and run a k6 load test.

Steps:

  1. Ask for: target endpoint, expected peak RPS, SLO thresholds (p95 latency, error rate)
  2. Write ramp-up → steady-state → ramp-down stages
  3. Set thresholds matching the SLO
  4. Add check() assertions on status code and response time

Version check: k6 --version — must be ≥ 1.0.0. k6 v0.x and v1.x have incompatible JavaScript API syntax. Upgrade: brew install k6 (macOS) or see https://grafana.com/docs/k6/latest/set-up/install-k6/ for other platforms.

  1. Run: k6 run --out json=results.json load-test.js
  2. Interpret results: p95/p99 latency, error rate, throughput achieved vs. thresholds

Reference: references/observability.md → Load Testing

Mode: capacity

Estimate resource requirements and HPA configuration for a service.

Steps:

  1. Gather: expected peak RPS, measured p99 latency, memory per pod at current load
  2. Apply formula: replicas = ceil((peak_rps × avg_latency_s) / target_concurrency_per_pod)
  3. Add 50% headroom for spikes
  4. Generate HPA manifest with CPU utilisation target ≤ 60%
  5. Set resource requests to measured baseline + 20%; set memory limit; omit CPU limit unless throttling is acceptable
  6. Define min/max replica bounds

Reference: references/observability.md → Capacity Planning

→ Next: After sizing, run /platform-skills:observability loadtest to validate the HPA triggers correctly under synthetic load.


Mode: slo

Define SLIs, set error budgets, and generate SLO burn-rate alerts from first principles.

Steps:

  1. Define SLIs — identify what "good" looks like for this service:
    • Availability: sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[5m])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
    • Latency: histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) < 0.3
    • Choose one primary SLI per service; add a secondary only if the first doesn't capture the user journey
  2. Set the SLO target — start conservative, tighten over time:
    SLO:           99.9% availability over a 30-day rolling window
    Error budget:  0.1% = 43.2 minutes per 30 days
  3. Generate burn-rate alerts — multiwindow, multi-burn-rate (Google SRE Book approach):
    # Fast burn — consumes 5% of monthly budget in 1h → page immediately
    - alert: SLOFastBurn
      expr: |
        (
          rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[1h])
          / rate(http_requests_total[1h])
        ) > (14.4 * 0.001)   # 14.4× burn rate exhausts budget in ~2 days
      for: 2m
      labels:
        severity: critical
      annotations:
        summary: "Fast error budget burn on {{ $labels.service }}"
        runbook: "https://runbooks.internal/slo-fast-burn"
    
    # Slow burn — consumes 10% of monthly budget in 6h → ticket
    - alert: SLOSlowBurn
      expr: |
        (
          rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[6h])
          / rate(http_requests_total[6h])
        ) > (6 * 0.001)      # 6× burn rate exhausts budget in ~5 days
      for: 15m
      labels:
        severity: warning
      annotations:
        summary: "Slow error budget burn on {{ $labels.service }}"
        runbook: "https://runbooks.internal/slo-slow-burn"
  4. Track remaining error budget — add to the Grafana dashboard:
    # Error budget remaining (%) over 30d
    1 - (
      sum(increase(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[30d]))
      / sum(increase(http_requests_total[30d]))
    ) / 0.001   # divide by error budget fraction (1 - SLO target)
  5. Error budget policy — state in writing what happens when the budget is depleted:
    • 50% remaining → normal feature velocity

    • 10–50% remaining → reliability improvements prioritised alongside features
    • <10% remaining → feature freeze; only reliability work until budget recovers

Key rules:

  • Alert on burn rate, not on raw error count — burn rate is predictive
  • The for: on fast burn should be short (1–2m); slow burn needs longer (10–15m)
  • Latency SLOs need histogram buckets aligned to the SLO threshold at chart creation time — you cannot retroactively add buckets

→ Next: Run /platform-skills:observability alert to add symptom-based alerts alongside SLO burn-rate alerts.


Common mistakes

  • Alerting on CPU% or memory% — these are causes, not symptoms. Alert on error rate and latency; let CPU/memory be dashboard panels only
  • Missing for: duration — without it, a single bad scrape triggers a page. Minimum 1m for slow alerts, 2m for fast SLO burn
  • Not defining SLOs before writing alerts — without an SLO, you don't know what threshold to alert at. Define the SLO first (slo mode), then write alerts
  • Histogram bucket boundaries misaligned with SLO — if your SLO is p95 < 300ms and you have no bucket at 0.3s, histogram_quantile interpolates inaccurately. Set le values at 0.1, 0.25, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5
  • Labelling with high-cardinality dimensions — never use user_id, session_id, or request_id as Prometheus label values. Cardinality explodes memory usage
  • Alert fatigue from symptom + cause alerts — if you alert on both "error rate high" and "database connection pool exhausted", both fire simultaneously for the same incident. Alert on the symptom; include cause investigation in the runbook

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.