agentleFS
nitinjain999nitinjain999/platform-skills/skills/dora/SKILL.md

dora

Skill71 starsChanged 8 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Measure, benchmark, instrument, and debug DORA metrics (Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, MTTR) for production engineering teams. Covers GitHub Actions instrumentation, Prometheus recording rules, Grafana dashboards, incident source integration, SaaS tool selection, and anti-pattern detection. Use when asked to "instrument DORA metrics", "benchmark our deployment frequency", "why is my MTTR data missing", or "generate a DORA dashboard".

  • Sends data out

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Add DORA event emission to a GitHub Actions workflow.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    If absent, stop: Pushgateway is a prerequisite, and installing it into the user's cluster is their call, not this skill's.

    line 26
  3. Very specific:

    If any query returns no data, check the recording rule deployment — see references/dora.md for the full rule set.

    line 93
  4. Very specific:

    Import the complete dashboard JSON from examples/dora/grafana-dashboard.json:

    line 103
  5. Very specific:

    Check: does the workflow step run on the correct trigger (on: push to main/release branch)?

    line 156
  6. Distinctive:

    Check: can the runner reach the Pushgateway?

    line 160
  7. Distinctive:

    Check: is the Pushgateway scrape target present in Prometheus?

    line 164
  8. Distinctive:

    Check: is the PagerDuty/OpsGenie webhook configured to send to the incident listener?

    line 170
  9. Distinctive:

    Check: does the webhook payload include both incident start and end timestamps?

    line 171
  10. Very specific:

    Check: is the GitHub Actions workflow triggered by repository_dispatch events for incident lifecycle?

    line 172
  11. Distinctive:

    Check: is any incident source (PagerDuty, OpsGenie, Jira) connected and sending events?

    line 179
  12. Distinctive:

    Do not accept 0% CFR without evidence that the incident source is emitting resolved incident events.

    line 180
  13. Distinctive:

    Check: Pushgateway retention — metrics expire after the configured push interval if not refreshed:

    line 183
  14. Distinctive:

    Check: Prometheus scrape config still includes the Pushgateway target after any config reload.

    line 187
  15. Very specific:

    Check: was the Pushgateway restarted without persistence?

    line 188
  16. Very specific:

    After completing this task, log errors and learnings via /platform-skills:self-improve log.

    line 194

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Measure, benchmark, and instrument DORA metrics for production engineering teams.

Mode: instrument

Add DORA event emission to a GitHub Actions workflow.

Steps:

  1. Identify which events to capture:
    • Deploy event: triggered on successful deployment to a target environment
    • Incident open event: triggered by PagerDuty/OpsGenie webhook when an incident is created
    • Incident close event: triggered when the incident is resolved
  2. Detect: does a Prometheus Pushgateway exist in the stack? If not, it must be deployed before instrumentation can work:
    kubectl get svc -A | grep pushgateway
    If absent, stop: Pushgateway is a prerequisite, and installing it into the user's cluster is their call, not this skill's. Give them a pinned install to run, then continue once the check above finds it:
    helm repo add prometheus-community https://prometheus-community.github.io/helm-charts
    helm upgrade --install prometheus-pushgateway prometheus-community/prometheus-pushgateway \
      --version 3.9.1 \
      --namespace monitoring \
      --create-namespace
  3. Generate GitHub Actions steps for each event type:
    • Deploy event: push dora_deployment_timestamp and dora_lead_time_seconds to Pushgateway
    • Incident triggered (PagerDuty/OpsGenie webhook): push dora_incident_start_timestamp
    • Incident resolved: push dora_incident_duration_seconds and dora_incident_caused_by_deploy
  4. Output: exact YAML to append to the existing workflow, using the Pushgateway job name convention job/dora/instance/<repo-owner_repo-name>. Sanitize owner/repo → owner_repo to avoid breaking Pushgateway path segments.

    Example deploy event step:

    - name: Push DORA deploy metrics
      if: success()
      env:
        PUSHGATEWAY_URL: ${{ secrets.PUSHGATEWAY_URL }}
        REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
      run: |
        DEPLOY_TS=$(date +%s)
        # Lead time from first commit in this batch — requires fetch-depth: 0 in checkout.
        FIRST_COMMIT_TS=$(git log --reverse --format="%ct" origin/main..HEAD | head -1)
        FIRST_COMMIT_TS=${FIRST_COMMIT_TS:-$DEPLOY_TS}
        LEAD_TIME=$((DEPLOY_TS - FIRST_COMMIT_TS))
        INSTANCE="${REPO//\//_}"
        curl --data-binary @- "${PUSHGATEWAY_URL}/metrics/job/dora/instance/${INSTANCE}" <<EOF
        # TYPE dora_deployment_timestamp gauge
        dora_deployment_timestamp{repo="${REPO}",env="production"} ${DEPLOY_TS}
        # TYPE dora_lead_time_seconds gauge
        dora_lead_time_seconds{repo="${REPO}",env="production"} ${LEAD_TIME}
        EOF
  5. Warn: Change Failure Rate requires incident source integration — a rate of 0% without incident data is a configuration gap, not a real metric. Never report 0% CFR without confirmed incident source connectivity.

Validation:

# Confirm Pushgateway received the metric
curl -s http://pushgateway:9091/metrics | grep dora_deployment_timestamp

# Confirm Prometheus scraped it (allow up to 1 scrape interval, default 15s)
curl -s 'http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=dora_deployment_timestamp' \
  | jq '.data.result[0].value[1] // "not yet scraped — wait 15s and retry"'

Reference: references/dora.md → Open-source instrumentation pattern

Mode: dashboard

Generate a Grafana dashboard for all four DORA metrics.

Steps:

  1. Confirm the four recording rules are deployed before building the dashboard:

    • dora:deployment_frequency:rate30d
    • dora:lead_time_seconds:p50
    • dora:change_failure_rate:ratio30d
    • dora:mttr_seconds:p50

    Verify with:

    curl -s 'http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=dora:deployment_frequency:rate30d' | jq '.data.result[0].value[1] // "no data"'

    If any query returns no data, check the recording rule deployment — see references/dora.md for the full rule set.

  2. Dashboard structure: four panels arranged in a 2×2 grid, one per DORA metric:

    • Panel 1 — Deployment Frequency: stat + time-series, unit: deploys/day
    • Panel 2 — Lead Time for Changes: stat + time-series, unit: hours (p50)
    • Panel 3 — Change Failure Rate: stat + time-series, unit: percentage
    • Panel 4 — MTTR: stat + time-series, unit: hours (p50)

    Each panel includes DORA performance band overlays as threshold regions (Elite/High/Medium/Low). A time range selector provides 30/60/90 day views.

  3. Import the complete dashboard JSON from examples/dora/grafana-dashboard.json:
    # Import via Grafana API
    curl -s -X POST http://grafana:3000/api/dashboards/import \
      -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
      -d @examples/dora/grafana-dashboard.json
  4. Threshold values for each performance tier are embedded directly in the panel JSON as threshold bands. Update them in the panel thresholds field if your organisation uses different band definitions.

Reference: references/dora.md → DORA performance bands

Mode: benchmark

Classify current metric values against DORA performance bands.

Steps:

  1. Accept current metric values — either provided directly or queried from Prometheus:
    # Query current values
    curl -s 'http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=dora:deployment_frequency:rate30d' | jq '.data.result[0].value[1] // "no data"'
    curl -s 'http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=dora:lead_time_seconds:p50' | jq '.data.result[0].value[1] // "no data"'
    curl -s 'http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=dora:change_failure_rate:ratio30d' | jq '.data.result[0].value[1] // "no data"'
    curl -s 'http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=dora:mttr_seconds:p50' | jq '.data.result[0].value[1] // "no data"'
  2. Map each metric to Elite / High / Medium / Low using the 2023 DORA performance bands:

    MetricEliteHighMediumLow
    Deployment FrequencyMultiple/dayWeekly–monthlyMonthly–6 monthsLess than 6 months
    Lead Time for Changes< 1 hour1 day – 1 week1 week – 1 month> 1 month
    Change Failure Rate< 5%5–10%10–15%> 15%
    MTTR< 1 hour< 1 day1 day – 1 week> 1 week
  3. Identify the weakest metric — the one furthest from Elite — as the highest-leverage improvement target.
  4. Suggest the most impactful improvement for that specific metric:
    • Low Deployment Frequency → reduce batch size, increase CI automation coverage
    • High Lead Time → eliminate manual approval gates, parallelize test stages
    • High Change Failure Rate → add pre-deploy smoke tests, feature flag risky changes
    • High MTTR → improve alerting signal-to-noise, add runbook links to alerts
  5. Output: tier table + one-sentence recommendation per metric.

Reference: references/dora.md → DORA performance bands

Mode: debug

Diagnose gaps in DORA metric data.

Steps:

  1. Missing deployment events
    • Check: does the workflow step run on the correct trigger (on: push to main/release branch)?
      grep -A5 '^on:' .github/workflows/*.yaml
    • Check: can the runner reach the Pushgateway?
      curl http://pushgateway:9091/-/healthy
    • Check: is the Pushgateway scrape target present in Prometheus?
      curl -s http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/targets | jq '.data.activeTargets[] | select(.labels.job == "pushgateway")'
  2. Missing MTTR (or stuck at 0)
    • Check: is the PagerDuty/OpsGenie webhook configured to send to the incident listener?
    • Check: does the webhook payload include both incident start and end timestamps?
    • Check: is the GitHub Actions workflow triggered by repository_dispatch events for incident lifecycle?
      grep -r 'repository_dispatch' .github/workflows/
  3. Change failure rate is exactly 0%
    • Flag as anti-pattern: a CFR of 0% without confirmed incident source integration is a configuration gap, not a real measurement.
    • Check: is any incident source (PagerDuty, OpsGenie, Jira) connected and sending events?
    • Do not accept 0% CFR without evidence that the incident source is emitting resolved incident events.
  4. Metrics stop at a specific date
    • Check: Pushgateway retention — metrics expire after the configured push interval if not refreshed:
      kubectl describe pod -n monitoring -l app=prometheus-pushgateway | grep -i retention
    • Check: Prometheus scrape config still includes the Pushgateway target after any config reload.
    • Check: was the Pushgateway restarted without persistence? Metrics in memory are lost on restart — enable persistence with --persistence.file.

Reference: references/dora.md → Anti-pattern detection


After completing this task, log errors and learnings via /platform-skills:self-improve log.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.