agentleFS
nimadorostkarnimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection/skills/languages/sql/SKILL.md

sql

Skill33 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when writing or optimizing SQL. Covers query planning, indexing strategy, window functions, CTEs, transaction isolation, and reading EXPLAIN output. Trigger on "this query is slow", "how do i read this explain plan", "write a window function for running totals", "what isolation level should i use". Do not use when the whole database is the bottleneck under load — see the database-performance skill; for Postgres-specific operations, see the postgres skill.

15 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write SQL that the planner can execute efficiently, and read execution plans well enough to know why it did not.

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Never run an unbounded UPDATE or DELETE on a large table in one transaction — batch it.

    line 56
  3. Very specific:

    Prefer keyset pagination (WHERE id > :last) over OFFSET — offset cost grows linearly with page depth.

    line 58

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

SQL

Purpose

Write SQL that the planner can execute efficiently, and read execution plans well enough to know why it did not.

When to Use

  • Writing non-trivial queries: aggregations, window functions, recursive CTEs.
  • Diagnosing a slow query.
  • Designing indexes for a known access pattern.
  • Choosing a transaction isolation level.
  • Reviewing migrations for lock risk.

Capabilities

  • Query authoring: joins, CTEs, window functions, lateral joins, upserts.
  • Index design: composite ordering, covering indexes, partial indexes.
  • Plan reading: EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) and the shapes that signal trouble.
  • Isolation levels and the anomalies each one permits.
  • Safe migrations: concurrent index builds, backfills, lock avoidance.

Inputs

  • The query, the schema, and the row counts of the tables involved.
  • Existing indexes.
  • The actual execution plan, not a guess about it.

Outputs

  • A rewritten query, an index, or both — with a before/after plan.
  • Migration statements that do not hold long locks.

Workflow

  1. Get the plan — EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS). Never optimize a query you have not profiled.
  2. Find the expensive node — Look for sequential scans on large tables, nested loops with high row counts, and estimates that diverge from actuals by an order of magnitude.
  3. Fix the cause — Bad estimate means stale statistics. Sequential scan on a selective filter means a missing index. High row counts through a join means the filter is applied too late.
  4. Index deliberately — Column order in a composite index is equality columns first, then the range or sort column.
  5. Re-measure — Confirm with a fresh plan, and check that write throughput did not regress.

Best Practices

  • An index on (a, b) serves queries filtering on a, and on a and b — but not on b alone.
  • Wrapping an indexed column in a function (WHERE lower(email) = ...) disables the index unless the index is on the expression.
  • SELECT * in application code prevents index-only scans and breaks when the schema changes.
  • Never run an unbounded UPDATE or DELETE on a large table in one transaction — batch it.
  • CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY in production; the plain form locks writes for the duration.
  • Prefer keyset pagination (WHERE id > :last) over OFFSET — offset cost grows linearly with page depth.

Examples

Window function instead of a correlated subquery:

-- Latest order per customer, one pass.
SELECT customer_id, order_id, placed_at, total_cents
FROM (
  SELECT
    o.customer_id,
    o.id AS order_id,
    o.placed_at,
    o.total_cents,
    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
      PARTITION BY o.customer_id
      ORDER BY o.placed_at DESC
    ) AS rn
  FROM orders o
  WHERE o.placed_at >= now() - interval '90 days'
) ranked
WHERE rn = 1;

Index matching the access pattern:

-- Query: WHERE tenant_id = $1 AND status = 'open' ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 50
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY idx_tickets_tenant_open_recent
  ON tickets (tenant_id, status, created_at DESC)
  WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;

Notes

  • The partial index above only covers live rows, keeping it small and hot in cache.
  • READ COMMITTED (the default in PostgreSQL) permits non-repeatable reads. If a transaction reads a row, decides, and writes based on that decision, you need REPEATABLE READ plus retry logic, or SELECT ... FOR UPDATE.
  • Statistics drift after bulk loads. Run ANALYZE before benchmarking anything.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.