review-observability
Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Review production telemetry against the canonical observability quality Rule set, including structured outcomes, correlation, SLIs, tracing, data safety, error ownership and background-work visibility.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- paultyng/skill-issuetheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- paultyng/skill-issue★ 8same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository77 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- archive-milestoneSkill
- assess-product-opportunitySkill
- automate-testsSkill
- bump-versionSkill
- capture-work-itemsSkill
- commit-workSkill
- competitive-researchSkill
- consume-nats-messageSkill
- decontextualize-textSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- define-docs-normsSkill
- define-missionSkill
- define-north-starSkill
- define-roadmapSkill
- define-strategic-pillarsSkill
- define-visionSkill
- deliver-featureSkill
- design-strategic-goalsSkill
- eli5Skill
- establish-delivery-workflowSkill
- execute-delivery-workflowSkill
- generate-agent-entrySkill
- generate-github-workflowSkill
- generate-standard-readmeSkill
- inspect-artifact-stateSkill
- integrate-branchesSkill
- manage-secretSkill
- map-item-dependenciesSkill
- market-researchSkill
- orchestrate-code-reviewSkill
- orchestrate-governance-stepSkill
- orchestrate-repair-loopSkill
- orchestrate-repair-requirements-loopSkill
- orchestrate-roadmap-planningSkill
- plan-milestonesSkill
- plan-nextSkill
- policy-researchSkill
- ponytailSkill
- prepare-presales-responseSkill
- prepare-version-notesSkill
- prioritize-backlogSkill
- product-opportunity-analysisSkill
- promote-roadmap-itemsSkill
- publish-nats-messageSkill
- record-milestone-achievementSkill
- redeploy-localSkill
- refine-skill-designSkill
- review-architectureSkill
- review-codebaseSkill
- review-diffSkill
- review-dotnetSkill
- review-error-surfacingSkill
- review-functional-designSkill
- review-goSkill
- review-implementation-alignmentSkill
- review-javaSkill
- review-orm-usageSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 45
Do not require logs, metrics and traces indiscriminately.
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not inspect live production data unless explicitly provided and authorized.
- Distinctive: line 47
Do not include protected values in findings.
- Distinctive: line 48
Do not treat dashboard existence as proof that the underlying signal is correct.
- Very specific: line 49
Do not restate a security obligation about disclosure.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: Review Observability
Purpose
Evaluate the supplied scope against observability-quality. This atomic Skill gathers production-signal evidence and emits findings-list output with category cognitive-observability.
Core objective
Determine whether changed production behavior can be measured, correlated and diagnosed safely, with one outcome for every applicable OBS item.
Scope boundaries
This Skill reviews observability only. It does not design incident processes, operate monitoring systems, review reliability behavior or performance efficiency, select scope, or modify code.
Use cases
- Review of deployable services, distributed workflows and background jobs
- The observability cognitive step in
orchestrate-code-review - Verification that a new behavior or failure path has safe operational evidence
Behavior
- Load observability-quality and record its version.
- Resolve service/workflow profiles, critical operations, SLI targets, data policy and waivers.
- Trace representative success and failure paths across telemetry calls, propagation, metrics, spans and job lifecycle signals.
- Inspect representative emitted fields or schemas. Validate correlation, bounded cardinality and protected-data handling rather than judging log prose alone.
- Emit one finding per failed item, citing
observability-quality@<version>/<OBS-ID>and categorycognitive-observability. - Return Rule coverage using the exact
passed,waived,not_applicableandevidence_limitedfields from the findings-list Spec.
Input and output
Input is selected source, configuration and telemetry definitions. Output is a standard findings list plus the coverage footer.
Restrictions
- Do not require logs, metrics and traces indiscriminately; apply each profile and item condition.
- Do not inspect live production data unless explicitly provided and authorized.
- Do not include protected values in findings.
- Do not treat dashboard existence as proof that the underlying signal is correct.
- Do not restate a security obligation about disclosure. This Skill owns where and how often a failure is recorded;
review-securityowns whether security telemetry is actionable without leaking secrets or exploitable internals.
Self-Check
- The canonical observability Rule and version were loaded.
- Profiles, critical operations, targets, data policy and waivers were resolved.
- Every applicable OBS item has a pass, finding, valid waiver or evidence limitation.
- Findings cite precise locations and Rule IDs without exposing protected data.
Examples
Example 1: asynchronous correlation is dropped
The producer starts a trace but omits context from message metadata. Emit an OBS-002 finding at the publish call and identify the consumer path that becomes disconnected.
Example 2: library-only change
A pure parser emits no telemetry and crosses no process boundary. Mark service/profile items N/A; evaluate OBS-005 only if telemetry was added or changed.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

