agentleFS
nesnilnehcnesnilnehc/ai-cortex/skills/define-vision/SKILL.md

define-vision

Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Define the long-term future the project aims to create. Answers what future we are building; produces a vision statement aligned with mission, persisted to docs.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Keep it consistent with the mission (read the mission from the define-mission output or from existing docs).

    line 48
  2. Very specific:

    Write the roadmap, requirements or backlog (use capture-work-items and the like).

    line 56
  3. Very specific:

    No metrics: no KPI, OKR or numeric target.

    line 67
  4. Distinctive:

    The roadmap has no aim: create a clear vision so the roadmap lines up with it.

    line 80
  5. Very specific:

    The second layer of the strategy chain: run it after define-mission when building the full hierarchy.

    line 81
  6. Distinctive:

    Offer options: when several futures are possible, present 1–3 candidate statements and ask the user to pick or refine one.

    line 90
  7. Very specific:

    Confirm: before overwriting an existing vision file, and before the final persist.

    line 91
  8. Very specific:

    Load the mission: read it from docs/project-overview/mission.md or from a summary the user provides.

    line 95
  9. Distinctive:

    Check consistency: make sure the vision supports the mission.

    line 98
  10. Very specific:

    Persist: write to the path the project agreed on.

    line 99
  11. Distinctive:

    Do not put a north star metric, strategic goals, OKRs or milestones into the vision statement.

    line 123
  12. Distinctive:

    Do not overwrite an existing vision file without explicit user confirmation.

    line 124
  13. Distinctive:

    Do not produce more than one vision document.

    line 125
  14. Distinctive:

    If not: the vision is incomplete or misaligned.

    line 168
  15. Distinctive:

    If yes: the vision is done.

    line 169

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skill: Define Vision

Purpose

Define and record the vision: the long-term future the project sets out to create. A vision statement answers "what future are we building?" and stays consistent with the mission. It defines no metrics, goals or milestones.

A vision is not:

  • The mission: the fundamental purpose behind the project (use define-mission).
  • The north star: the single metric that stands for delivered value (use define-north-star).
  • Strategic goals: the 3–5 outcomes that realize the vision (use design-strategic-goals).
  • Milestones: stage checkpoints during execution (use define-roadmap).

Core Goal

Primary goal: produce a user-confirmed vision statement consistent with the mission, and persist it to the path the project agreed on.

Success criteria (all of them must hold):

  1. ✅ A vision statement exists: one to three sentences describing the desired future state alone (no metrics, OKRs, roadmap).
  2. ✅ Consistent with the mission: the vision does not contradict the mission; when the mission is missing, suggest running define-mission first, or state the assumed purpose.
  3. ✅ User confirmation: the user approved it explicitly ("approved", "looks good", "go ahead" or equivalent).
  4. ✅ Persisted as a document: written to the agreed path (default docs/project-overview/vision.md, or the project norms).
  5. ✅ Scope respected: the statement defines no north star metric, strategic goal or milestone.
  6. ✅ YAGNI/DRY/concision: follow the document-artifact principles in spec §4; the vision statement is the core, avoid optional paragraphs that earn nothing (an explicit note on mission alignment or on the time horizon, say).

Acceptance test: can a reader tell what long-term future the project is trying to create, and see that it is consistent with the mission?

Handoff point: once the vision is approved and persisted, hand off to define-north-star or design-strategic-goals; stop when only the vision was asked for.


Scope Boundary

What this skill must do

  • Articulate the desired long-term future state of the project or product.
  • Produce the vision statement (1–3 sentences).
  • Keep it consistent with the mission (read the mission from the define-mission output or from existing docs).
  • Persist it to the path the project agreed on (default docs/project-overview/vision.md).

What this skill cannot do

  • Define the fundamental purpose (use define-mission).
  • Define the north star metric or the strategic goals (use define-north-star, design-strategic-goals).
  • Define milestones (use define-roadmap).
  • Write the roadmap, requirements or backlog (use capture-work-items and the like).

Vision Quality Guide

A strong vision statement should have:

  • Concision: 1–3 sentences, focused on the future state.
  • Consistency with the mission: it supports the fundamental purpose in the mission and introduces no new one.
  • Imaginability: a picture of success 2–5 years out; the reader can sketch a concrete scene.
  • No metrics: no KPI, OKR or numeric target; metrics belong to define-north-star or design-strategic-goals.

What to avoid in a vision:

  • Implementation detail: technology, deliverables, or "how" it gets done.
  • Buzzwords: vague terms that clarify no future state.

When to Use

  • After the mission is done: with "why we exist" settled, establish "the future we are building".
  • A strategy or direction reset: realign the team around the long-term aim.
  • The roadmap has no aim: create a clear vision so the roadmap lines up with it.
  • The second layer of the strategy chain: run it after define-mission when building the full hierarchy.

Behavior

Interaction strategy

  • Default: the output path from the project norms (docs/ARTIFACT_NORMS.md or .ai-cortex/artifact-norms.yaml); otherwise docs/project-overview/vision.md. Infer the mission from docs/project-overview/mission.md or from the user.
  • Offer options: when several futures are possible, present 1–3 candidate statements and ask the user to pick or refine one.
  • Confirm: before overwriting an existing vision file, and before the final persist. When the mission is missing, confirm whether to assume a purpose, or suggest running define-mission first.

Execution

  1. Load the mission: read it from docs/project-overview/mission.md or from a summary the user provides.
  2. Elicit: what does "success" look like 2–5 years out? What kind of world are we creating for users?
  3. Draft: the vision statement (1–3 sentences); future state only, no metrics or KPIs.
  4. Check consistency: make sure the vision supports the mission; refine it with the user where needed.
  5. Persist: write to the path the project agreed on; create docs/project-overview/ when it is missing.

Input and Output

Input:

  • Required: the mission (the statement itself, or the path to the mission document); project/product context.
  • Optional: an existing vision draft, a time horizon, the audience.

Output:

  • Artifact: the vision statement (1–3 sentences).
  • Location: docs/project-overview/vision.md (or per the project norms).
  • Content: the vision statement; optionally (YAGNI: only where there is a real need) a "mission alignment" or "time horizon" note.
  • Lifecycle: living (updated when the strategic direction changes).

Limits

Hard Boundaries

  • Do not put a north star metric, strategic goals, OKRs or milestones into the vision statement.
  • Do not overwrite an existing vision file without explicit user confirmation.
  • Do not produce more than one vision document; this skill emits the vision artifact alone.
  • YAGNI: the vision document centres on the statement; add no optional paragraph that earns nothing.

Skill Boundaries (avoid overlap)

Do not do these (other skills own them):

  • Mission: the fundamental purpose → Use define-mission
  • North star metric: the single key metric → Use define-north-star
  • Strategic goals: 3–5 outcomes → Use design-strategic-goals
  • Milestones: stage checkpoints → Use define-roadmap
  • Roadmap, requirements or backlog → Use capture-work-items and the like

When to stop and hand off:

  • The user says "approved" or equivalent → the vision is done, hand off to define-north-star or design-strategic-goals
  • The user asks for "a metric" or "a north star" → Hand off to define-north-star
  • The user asks about goals or milestones → Hand off to design-strategic-goals or define-roadmap

Self-Check

Core success criteria (all of them must hold)

  • A vision statement exists: one to three sentences, future state only (no metric, goal or milestone).
  • Consistent with the mission: it does not contradict the mission, or the missing mission is noted and confirmed by the user.
  • User confirmation: the user said "approved", "looks good", "go ahead" or similar.
  • Persisted as a document: written to the agreed path (default docs/project-overview/vision.md, or the project norms).
  • Scope respected: the statement carries no north star, goal or milestone.
  • YAGNI/DRY/concision: follows the document-artifact principles in spec §4.

Process quality checks

  • The mission was used: was the mission read or asked for before the vision was drafted?
  • Future state only: were metrics and OKRs kept out of the mix?
  • The quality guide: was the vision quality guide applied (concision, consistency with the mission, imaginability, no buzzwords)?
  • Document-artifact principles: were YAGNI, DRY and concision followed (spec §4)?

Acceptance test

Can a reader tell what long-term future the project is trying to create, and see that it supports the mission?

If not: the vision is incomplete or misaligned. Refine it against the mission and check again. If yes: the vision is done. Continue to the handoff, or stop.


Examples

Example 1: defining a vision when the mission already exists

Context: the mission reads "We exist to give engineering teams one reliable way to take a service from code to production." The user asks for a vision.

Flow: elicit the 2–5 year aim, such as "every team ships to production in under 5 minutes with a single click, with full audit and rollback." Draft the vision; check that it supports the mission. The user confirms. Write to docs/project-overview/vision.md.

Result: the vision is persisted; hand off to define-north-star (for instance "successful deployments per week within 5 minutes") or design-strategic-goals.

Example 2: the mission is not defined yet (edge case)

Context: the user asks to "define our vision", but no mission document exists.

Flow: ask whether to assume a purpose from the README or the surrounding context, or suggest running define-mission first. If the user chooses to continue, note the assumed purpose in the vision document; draft the vision and confirm it with the user. Persist it, and suggest filling in the mission later to complete the strategy chain.

Result: the vision is persisted with an optional "assumed purpose" note; the user can run define-mission later to complete the chain.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.