wiki-wikify
Skill1 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Experimental. Mark a copy of the user's note with what the wiki knows: a link mark where a phrase names a document of the wiki, and a new mark where it names a subject worth a topic. The user accepts or ignores each mark in Obsidian; nothing enters the wiki by itself. Use for wikify this note, review this doc, link this draft to the wiki, what in this note does the wiki know. Drafting the topic of a new subject is wiki-edit; files to learn from are wiki-ingest.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nathanaday/atlas-obsidianword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- nathanaday/almagestword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- nathanaday/almagest★ 1100% same
- nathanaday/atlas-obsidian★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- almagest-onboardSkill
- almagestSkill
- repo-ingestSkill
- repo-linkSkill
- repo-unlinkSkill
- wiki-checkoutSkill
- wiki-editSkill
- wiki-ingestSkill
- wiki-mapSkill
- wiki-querySkill
- wiki-reviewSkill
- wiki-saveSkill
- wiki-syncSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
Start refuses a file that is not markdown, Almagest.md, and a note under tool/source-core/, changes/, tool/sessions/, wiki-view/, …
- Very specific: line 36
Match: Put the subjects in one Item Map, {"doc": "<the copy's path>", "chunk": 0, "items": [...]}, and call match with items set to that …
- Very specific: line 42
near: read each neighbor's description, and the document with Read when the description does not settle it.
- Distinctive: line 56
Never mark a phrase inside a quote of another person's words.
- Distinctive: line 59
Put a phrase that holds another phrase first ("learning rate schedule" before "learning rate").
- Very specific: line 62
Mark: Call wikify once, with action: mark, note set to the copy's path, and marks: [{"phrase": "…", "link": "<id>"}, {"phrase": "…", "new": …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
wiki-wikify
Wikify works on a copy of a note in scratchpad/, never on the note itself. This skill
finds the subjects that the copy's prose names, matches them against the wiki, and
writes marks into the copy with one wikify mark call. The Obsidian plugin shows each
mark as a bubble. The user accepts a link, ignores a mark, or asks an agent to create
the topic of a new subject.
Tools: wikify (start, mark), match, and Read. References:
pages.md.
Procedure
- The copy. The palette sends
/almagest:wiki-wikify Wikify [[<copy title>]]: mark what the wiki knows and the subjects worth a topic, with wikify mark.The link names the copy,scratchpad/<copy title>.md. The palette made the copy and opened it. From the chat ("wikify this note"), find the note that the user names, and ask when two notes match. Then callwikifywithaction: startandnoteset to the note's path in the vault. Code copies the note toscratchpad/<name> · wikified.md(<name> · wikified (2).mdwhen that name is taken) and returns the path incopy. Start refuses a file that is not markdown,Almagest.md, and a note undertool/source-core/,changes/,tool/sessions/,wiki-view/,tool/trash/, or.obsidian/. A note injournals/may be wikified; its copy lies inscratchpad/. - Read the copy with Read.
- Subjects. List the subjects that the prose names, with the kinds of
wiki-extract: entity, concept, or policy. For each
subject, write the
namethe wiki would give it, thealiases(the note's wording when it differs, and abbreviations), and a one-sentencedescriptionfrom the note. Code never marks text in the frontmatter, a heading, a table row, code, a link, a URL, a comment, or a mark, so leave out a subject that the note names only there. - Match. Put the subjects in one Item Map,
{"doc": "<the copy's path>", "chunk": 0, "items": [...]}, and callmatchwithitemsset to that one map. Each subject comes back ashit(page: the document that holds its name or an alias),near(neighborsabove the threshold, with scores), ornew(the closest neighbors). - Choose the marks. One mark per subject, at most:
- hit: a mark with
linkset to the page's id. - near: read each neighbor's description, and the document with Read when the
description does not settle it. Mark a
linkonly when the neighbor surely is the subject. Otherwise judge the subject as new. - new: a mark with
newset to a title, only when the subject carries weight in the note (the note explains it, or relies on it) and the wiki has no topic for it. Mark a few new subjects per note at most: the ones with the most weight. Give each a title in the form of the wiki's titles: look at the titles of the hits and the neighbors, and use the same case and the same form (a name, not a phrase from the sentence). Code removes/ \ : * ? " < > | [ ] # ^ →from a title, and a title holds at most 150 bytes. - The
phraseis the words of the subject's first mention, as the note writes them. It is one line, with no|,{, or}. Code finds the first mention that is free (whole words, without regard to case), so the phrase names the first mention, not a later one. - Never mark a phrase inside a quote of another person's words. When the first mention of a subject lies in such a quote, mark nothing for it, unless another wording of the subject comes first outside the quote.
- Put a phrase that holds another phrase first ("learning rate schedule" before "learning rate"). Code places the marks in the order given, and a later phrase cannot land inside an earlier mark.
- hit: a mark with
- Mark. Call
wikifyonce, withaction: mark,noteset to the copy's path, andmarks:[{"phrase": "…", "link": "<id>"}, {"phrase": "…", "new": "<Title>"}], exactly one oflinkandnewin each. Code resolves eachlinkto a document (by id, title, or alias) and writes that document's title. Anewtitle that names a document already becomes a link to it. Code replaces each phrase with{{link:<Title>|<phrase>}}or{{new:<Title>|<phrase>}}, keeps the note's spelling of the phrase, and writes the copy once. It returnsplaced, andmissingfor the phrases it did not find. A refused call writes nothing: fix what the refusal names (a mark, or the note) and call again. - End with one line: the copy as a link, the count of links and of new subjects you
marked, and each phrase in
missing.
Gate
The copy is the user's scratch. Never edit the original note. Never edit the copy with
Edit or Write: only wikify mark writes into it. Code commits nothing; the next quiet
snapshot keeps the copy. Never report the vault's git state.
Nothing enters the wiki from this skill. In Obsidian, Accept turns a link mark into a link, and Ignore turns a mark back into its phrase. Create on a new mark starts a draft work document and an agent (wiki-edit) that proposes the topic. The topic enters the wiki only when the user approves that change.
Hand off
wiki-edit when the user asks in the chat to draft the topic of a new subject. wiki-ingest when the user wants the note itself in the wiki as a source.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

