wiki-sync
Skill1 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Absorb sources into the wiki through one pipeline: chunk, extract, match, draft, change. It serves every way knowledge enters: a captured file, a repository snapshot, a saved passage, a published journal edition. Use for sync the wiki, absorb the pending sources, update the wiki from this source, what does the wiki still need to learn. Capturing files is wiki-ingest; changing topics that exist is wiki-edit.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rumi-chan/llm-wikitheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- juanitourquiza/shipframetheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- nathanaday/almagestword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- nathanaday/atlas-obsidianword for word, first seen Oct 7, 2026
- Jawahars07/ballasttheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
- sponge-b0b/Polaristheir own version, first seen Aug 3, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- nathanaday/almagest★ 1100% same
- nathanaday/atlas-obsidian★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- richard-kim-79/archora-skills★ 49same name
- juanitourquiza/shipframe★ 4same name
- sponge-b0b/Polaris★ 4same name
- Jawahars07/ballast★ 1same name
- rumi-chan/llm-wiki★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- almagest-onboardSkill
- almagestSkill
- repo-ingestSkill
- repo-linkSkill
- repo-unlinkSkill
- wiki-checkoutSkill
- wiki-editSkill
- wiki-ingestSkill
- wiki-mapSkill
- wiki-querySkill
- wiki-reviewSkill
- wiki-saveSkill
- wiki-wikifySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 32
Chunks: Call source with action: chunks and doc for each source.
- Very specific: line 39
Match: Call match with every Item Map at once in items, so a subject named in three chunks is one subject.
- Distinctive: line 41
Slice: Put every subject that hits or nears one topic into one slice, so two drafters never write one topic.
- Very specific: line 64
When progress or propose refuses with "the user cancelled ….
- Distinctive: line 78
Never paraphrase the edition into a claim it does not make.
- Very specific: line 80
Never change a note in journals/ or the edition's text in tool/source-core/originals/.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
wiki-sync
A source is pending until an applied change absorbs it. This skill drains pending sources: it cuts each into chunks, sends a worker to extract what each chunk says, matches the subjects against the wiki in code, sends drafters to decide and write, and proposes one change the user reviews. When wiki-ingest hands it a work document, every step goes into that document, and the change fills it.
Tools: vault, source (chunks, read), match, change. Agents:
wiki-extract, wiki-draft.
References: changes.md,
pages.md.
Procedure
- Sources. Take the ids given, or the
pendinglist fromvault. The palette's Publish message names one journal edition and a work document: "Absorb the source [[…]] (<id>), the user's journal edition. … Your work document is [[…]] (<id>)". Use that work document, as wiki-ingest does, and follow A journal edition. One change holds at most about ten sources or forty chunks; more is several changes, one after another. From the samevaultcall, keep the tag list (every tag with its count), thetaggingmode, and the vault's description. With a work document id, report each step below withchangeaction: progress, one line each: "extracted 9 of 12 chunks", "matched 31 subjects: 12 hits, 4 near, 15 new", "drafted 14 writes in 3 slices". - Chunks. Call
sourcewithaction: chunksanddocfor each source. - Extract. Send one wiki-extract per chunk, in waves
of at most eight. Give each the source id, the chunk index, the source's tags, the
tag list, and the vault's description. A single small chunk, extract yourself:
sourcewithaction: read, then the procedure of wiki-extract. - Check. Each Item Map names its chunk and is complete. Send a
partialchunk again, narrower. - Match. Call
matchwith every Item Map at once initems, so a subject named in three chunks is one subject. - Slice. Put every subject that hits or nears one topic into one slice, so two drafters never write one topic. At most eight subjects per slice.
- Draft. Send one wiki-draft per slice, with the ids
of the sources being absorbed, their tags, the tag list, and the
taggingmode. Draft yourself when there are one or two slices. - Assemble the Wiki Change Plan:
- every drafted write;
- for each source: a modify of the source, with its
description,tags,authority,## Summary, and## Structure(from the chunk summaries; keep the embed line at the top of the body; a journal edition keepsauthority: primary); absorbs: the source ids;new_tags: truewhen a write adds a tag that no document holds, and the user agreed to it intagging: knownmode;title: a short name ("Ingest the DINOv2 paper");notes: what the change does, the triage lines from wiki-ingest, the coverage (every chunk read, any chunk partial), and every skipped subject with its reason;- a
whyon every write: one line that says why the change makes it. Past 25 new topics, keep the ones the most claims support and list the rest in the notes for a later run.
- Propose the change:
changewithaction: propose, andidset to the work document when one runs. When the sources make several changes, the first fills the work document and the others are new change documents.
When progress or propose refuses with "the user cancelled …; stop the work", stop at
once: send no more workers, and say in one line that the user cancelled the work.
A journal edition
A source with origin: journal is an edition of a journal volume: a copy of the user's
own notes, captured when the user pressed Publish. Its title is "User Journal <volume
name> - <D Month YYYY> Edition". Each section of its text is one note, headed by the
note's path in the volume (## labs/Lab 1). The edition holds the user's words, so
these rules apply to it in addition to the procedure:
- Cite the edition on every claim it supports, with the section as the locator:
[[User Journal CS566 Notes - 6 October 2026 Edition]], labs/Lab 1. - Where a topic quotes the user, quote the edition's wording exactly.
- Never paraphrase the edition into a claim it does not make. Keep the user's opinion an opinion, and the user's question a question.
- Never change a note in
journals/or the edition's text intool/source-core/originals/. The source's modify in step 8 sets onlydescription,tags,## Summary, and## Structure(one line per section), and keepsauthority: primary. - Tell each extractor and each drafter that the source is a journal edition.
Gate
End the turn with one or two lines: the change document as a link, the count of writes, and each new tag. The document's Summary and Notes hold the rest; do not repeat them in the chat. The user decides once, in the document (Approve or Cancel), or with a yes in the chat. On a yes in the chat, apply. The change tool refuses apply in the same turn as the proposal. A change the user approves or cancels in Obsidian needs nothing more from you.
A change with no writes (the sources held nothing new) needs no yes. Apply it and say so in one line: the sources are no longer pending.
Hand off
wiki-map when new topics landed under two child tags of one tag; wiki-review after a large sync.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

