pr-screenshots
Skill15 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Verify a visual change in a real browser with the Playwright MCP and attach before/after screenshots to its PR. Use when a change affects anything you can see (UI, pages, emails, charts) and before opening or updating its PR.
14 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- github/squadtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Venkateshvenki404224/shipcraft-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- github/awesome-copilottheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- michalklejdysz/pr-visualstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- nabondance/stratatheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- microsoft/github-vteam-industry-demostheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use security-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SentrySkillsecurity-review
Finds exploitable application security vulnerabilities in code changes. Use for Warden security scans, appsec review, OWASP-style checks, authentication or authorization bugs, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, secrets, unsafe crypto, webhook verification, open redirects, or sensitive data exposure.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions14 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 14
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- github/gh-aw★ 5.6ksame name
- lukevella/rallly★ 5.4ksame name
- github/squad★ 3.4ksame name
- levy-street/world-of-claudecraft★ 2.3ksame name
- getsentry/skills★ 1.1ksame name
- BrOrlandi/my-claude-skills★ 22same name
- bwhtech/skills★ 3same name
- krimvp/xpl★ 2same name
- microsoft/github-vteam-industry-demos★ 2same name
4 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- fix-bugSkill
- worktree-lifecycleSkill
- wrap-up-summarySkill
The file
Files
Verify in the browser, screenshot the PR
Reviewers should judge a visual change without checking the branch out. Unit tests don't show what a user sees, so verify live.
- Run this worktree's app on its own ports:
nf up --bg, thennf envfor the URL (each worktree has its own, so you never test another task's code by mistake). - Before: capture the current behaviour from the main checkout's URL (slot 0), or from the deployed site.
- After: open this worktree's URL with the Playwright MCP (
browser_navigate), drive the flow (browser_snapshotto read the page, then click/type by role and text, not CSS selectors), and take screenshots (browser_take_screenshot) of each state the change touches. Cover each theme or viewport the change affects. Name files for what they show:before-checkout.png,after-checkout-mobile.png. - Attach:
The images go to one orphan branch (nf pr create --body-file pr.md --shots before-checkout.png after-checkout.png # new PR nf shots <pr#> after-checkout-v2.png --attach # existing PRassets/pr-screenshots, apr-<n>-<slug>/folder per PR), so they render inline, even on a private repo, and never enter the merge diff. - Clean up: close the browser (
browser_close) and delete the screenshot files you saved locally (only your own; other sessions may share the folder).
Skip screenshots only for changes with nothing to see (pure backend, config, docs) or when the surface genuinely can't be rendered locally; say which in the PR.
<sub>Part of nanoflow by nanosite.ai.</sub>
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

