train-topic
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run a structured deep-dive training session on an AI/ML, cloud-platform, or dev topic in this learning project. Use when the user asks to be trained on, taught, or to study/learn/deep-dive a topic from CLAUDE.md's scope, or references a topic already tracked in TRAINING.md.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- book-studySkill
- interview-prep-kitSkill
- mock-interviewSkill
- quick-recapSkill
- quiz-flashcardsSkill
- spaced-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 13
Read TRAINING.md. If the topic already has notes (in progress or later), read topics/<slug>/README.md and resume from where it left off …
- Very specific: line 15
If the user supplied a file or link as source material, save it under resources/<slug>/ first (copy local files.
- Very specific: line 49
Write/append the session's material to topics/<slug>/README.md.
- Very specific: line 51
Always hand off to quiz-flashcards to export atomic fact/definition/term-style questions from the session as CSV cards (not the open-ended …
- Very specific: line 55
Update the topic's row in TRAINING.md: status, last-touched date (use the actual current date), and a one-line note (what was covered / …
- Very specific: line 57
If validation passed for the first time (or the topic just moved to reviewed/mastered), add a row for it to REVIEW.md at Box 1 if it isn't …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Train Topic
Runs the fixed 5-stage learning flow the user wants for every topic, and keeps TRAINING.md and
topics/<slug>/ in sync so progress persists across sessions.
Before starting
- Read
TRAINING.md. If the topic already has notes (in progressor later), readtopics/<slug>/README.mdand resume from where it left off instead of restarting the overview. - If the user supplied a file or link as source material, save it under
resources/<slug>/first (copy local files; for links, note the URL and fetch/summarize as needed), then use it as a primary source alongside your own knowledge. - Pick a
slugfor the topic (kebab-case, matches thetopics/folder name) if one doesn't already exist inTRAINING.md.
The 5 stages
Work through these in order in a single session where practical. For large topics (e.g. "RAG",
"Kubernetes on EKS"), it's fine to split across sessions — just checkpoint status in TRAINING.md
after each stage.
- Overview — what it is, why it exists, where it fits relative to adjacent topics the user is also studying (e.g. relate RAG to embeddings + vector DBs already on their list). Keep this to the level of a strong intro, not exhaustive.
- Deep dive — mechanics, key concepts, trade-offs, common pitfalls, how it compares to alternatives. This is the section worth the most detail.
- Hands-on practice — a runnable exercise: code snippet, CLI walkthrough, or config example the user can execute. Prefer minimal, real, working examples over pseudocode. If you have a runtime available, run it yourself first and fix anything broken before handing it to the user.
- Real-world application — 1-3 concrete scenarios where this shows up in production or in an
FDE/solutions-engineering context, tying back to
TRAINING.md's "Company / role prep" section when relevant. - Validation — a short quiz (5-10 questions, mixed format: multiple choice, short answer,
"explain this to me") or a teach-it-back exercise. Don't mark the topic
masteredinTRAINING.mduntil the user has actually attempted validation and done reasonably well —reviewedis the right status if they stop before validating.
Flag explicitly anything that's fast-moving or you're not fully certain is current (model names, pricing, API surface, service names) rather than stating it as settled fact — this domain changes monthly.
Persisting output
- Write/append the session's material to
topics/<slug>/README.md. Structure it with the 5 stage headers above so future sessions (and future-you) can see what's covered. - Always hand off to
quiz-flashcardsto export atomic fact/definition/term-style questions from the session as CSV cards (not the open-ended "explain this to me" ones — those aren't a good Anki card format) — this is the Anki deck's only input, so don't skip it just because the session's quiz wasn't the primary focus. - Update the topic's row in
TRAINING.md: status, last-touched date (use the actual current date), and a one-line note (what was covered / what's left). - If validation passed for the first time (or the topic just moved to
reviewed/mastered), add a row for it toREVIEW.mdat Box 1 if it isn't already tracked there — this hands it off tospaced-reviewfor scheduled open-ended re-testing (teach-it-back, system-design-style recall). Don't add a row before validation. This is separate from the Anki export above — see "Anki vs spaced-review" in thespaced-reviewskill for the division of labor.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

